Hampshire County Council decide – No wind turbines on our land

No wind turbines on Hampshire CC land, as council make decision. We ask David Pugh if he’s thinking of something similar on the Island.

No to turbines

The Conservative administration at Hampshire council have decided to set a county-wide policy that they will not allow large scale wind turbines or wind farms to be built on their council land.

The ‘Policy for Large Wind Turbines and Wind Farms on County Council Land’ was decided by Cllr Ken Thornber, the leader of the council yesterday.

Thornber: “A duty to ensure our land is used responsibly”
Before the decision was made, Councillor Thornber said, “The County Council is a significant landowner in Hampshire and we have a duty to ensure our land is used responsibly in the wider public interest. It is important that we carefully consider the benefits and impact of large scale wind turbines on our land, whether they might come at the expense of Hampshire’s character and environment, and if they justify the loss of some of Hampshire’s most prized undeveloped countryside.”

For those wanting to read in depth into this, we’ve included the the press release Hampshire CC put out in advance of yesterday’s decision. Beneath that we’ve embedded, for your convenience, Hampshire CC’s Decision Report and the sample of response they had received from the public to their consultation.

On The Wight ask Cllr Pugh – Coming to the Island?
Given the physical closeness of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, and our council’s record of refusing planning applications for wind turbines on the Island, we asked council leader Cllr Pugh if he’d be considering a move like Hampshire has made?

He replied with the following, which he’d previously given to IW CPRE in a response to their queries in November 2012:-

With regard to your request that the IW Council makes a statement similar to Hampshire County Council about not allowing wind turbines to go on local authority land, my inclination is that we would not wish to match Hampshire County Council’s stance in this regard. Our approach has always been one of considering each situation on its own merits, and I don’t think that a blanket policy on this would therefore be helpful. In any event, our land holdings that could potentially be suitable for such uses will be much more limited than Hampshire’s, so it could end up being a wholly academic stance. Nevertheless, if such scenarios did arise, we would want to consider them on their own individual merit.

Furthermore, I hope that you will also appreciate the local sensitivity in making any such directives, given that the Island’s economy benefits from having jobs employed in this industry, and we would not wish to make any statements that could serve to undermine the future of these jobs.

Hampshire CC Press release
Here’s the press release that Hampshire put out in advance of last night’s meeting

A report that sets out Hampshire County Council’s proposed position on large wind turbine and wind farms on Council-owned land will be considered on 24 January 2013.

The Executive Member for Policy and Resources, Councillor Ken Thornber, whose function includes strategy for the use of resources such as Council owned land, will be asked to consider a position statement.

The decision by Council Leader, Councillor Thornber, will be in relation to the Council’s role as a landowner in Hampshire, and it would provide clear guidance for scheme promoters. It also aims to recognise the often conflicting objectives between the benefits of wind power in providing clean renewable energy, and the visual and amenity impact on Hampshire’s outstanding, high quality landscapes and countryside. These are important economic assets in their own right, as well as being a key aspect of the character of Hampshire.

Almost half of the County’s overall landscape is protected as a result of its landscape or biodiversity importance; encompassing the New Forest and South Downs National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty in the North Wessex Downs, Cranborne Chase, West Wiltshire Downs and Chichester Harbour as well as a host of nature conservation sites. Outside these areas, landscapes are still sensitive to development including wind turbines or wind farms, as these are often tracts of undeveloped land between areas of existing development, or small-scale, ancient landscapes with tranquil character. The management of the County Council’s rural estate, which is mostly farmland or land managed for countryside access, contributes to the character of the County’s landscape and to quality of life for Hampshire residents.

The report to be considered highlights that large wind turbines and wind farms are major developments (an average on-shore wind farm of eight, 100metre high turbines can cover an area equivalent to 220 football pitches), and their introduction within rural Hampshire would have a significant impact in the countryside, and on the County’s historic character. It is also considered that at present, the business case generally does not support large on-shore turbine developments, though in the future, there could be improvements to the design, technology, efficiency, operation and cost of wind turbines, which could make them a more attractive option. Therefore the County Council’s position is to be kept under close scrutiny.

Councillor Thornber said: “We are completely signed up to the benefits of secure, affordable and low carbon energy and are already exploring a number of options within the Energy Strategy agreed by Cabinet at the end of last year, that would ensure Hampshire has future access to sustainable and secure energy sources. Plans are moving forward to create a District Energy Network (DEN) in Winchester to reduce carbon emissions, save money, and help reduce the energy consumption of major organisations, such as the hospital, the University, Winchester Prison, and the County and City Councils. On-shore wind power is not the only source of low carbon energy.

“The County Council is a significant landowner in Hampshire and we have a duty to ensure our land is used responsibly in the wider public interest. It is important that we carefully consider the benefits and impact of large scale wind turbines on our land, whether they might come at the expense of Hampshire’s character and environment, and if they justify the loss of some of Hampshire’s most prized undeveloped countryside.”

The County Council is not the Local Planning Authority for wind turbines or wind farm development, and has no responsibility for making planning policy, nor for deciding planning applications for wind turbines or wind farms.

The agenda and papers for the meeting of the Executive Member for Policy and Resources on 24 January 2013 can be found here.

Decision report


Summary of responses


Via

Wightfibre sponsors the Isle of Wight News by OnTheWight

Friday, 25th January, 2013 7:55pm

By

ShortURL: http://wig.ht/2ase

Filed under: Green Issues, Isle of Wight News, Overseas, Top story

Print Friendly

.



10 Comments

  1. greenfiremouse's comment not rated yet. Add your vote Vote +1 Vote -1

    25.Jan.2013 7:58pm

    Disgraceful.

    Reply
  2. Darran's comment is rated +1 Vote +1 Vote -1

    25.Jan.2013 8:03pm

    What a sorry state of affairs, at least Pugh didn’t agree with the idea.

    Reply
  3. bayboy's comment is rated +3 Vote +1 Vote -1

    25.Jan.2013 11:56pm

    It’s great to see at long last that the whole global warming/ climate change / extreme weather con has been rumbled. Obviously, ‘some of the people have been fooled all of the time’. No temperatures rises for over 20 years, certainly not what the con artists predicted !

    Reply
  4. tryme's comment is rated +2 Vote +1 Vote -1

    26.Jan.2013 9:33am

    Respect to the Hampshire Council Leader. What a refreshing change his straightforward statement makes! No embarrassment about standing up for the protection of our natural environment as it stands today.

    David Pugh’s statement in response is rather odd. As he thinks we have limited land here that might be used for turbines, surely all the more reason to protect it.

    Reply
    • tryme's comment not rated yet. Add your vote Vote +1 Vote -1

      26.Jan.2013 10:28am

      ..And why would David Pugh think that a similar statement here would put the jobs at risk of Island people manufacturing turbines?

      Reply
  5. martin william wareham's comment is rated -6 Vote +1 Vote -1

    26.Jan.2013 6:10pm

    David Pugh didn’t have a lot of choice in his reply .Less you forget the Island has given permission for the erection of THREE small Wind Turbines on Cheverton Down which will be happening soon.

    Reply
  6. Island Monkey's comment is rated +4 Vote +1 Vote -1

    26.Jan.2013 6:43pm

    You do love winding the locals up eh Mr Wareham? Those turbines will never be built at Cheverton – they no longer make the model originally applied for and larger ones were refused.

    Reply
  7. Rowan's comment is rated -1 Vote +1 Vote -1

    30.Jan.2013 9:33am

    What I’d ask, if I were a Hampshire voter, is what Hampshire County Council _do_ plan to do as their contribution to slowing down climate change.

    One of the ironies of their position is that some of Hampshire’s ‘most prized undeveloped countryside’ is actually farmland which has been managed in such a way that it too has contributed to climate change. When farmers have ripped out woods and orchards and hedges, and overcultivated the soil so that it has lost almost all its organic matter content, they have put tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimated that two-thirds of climate change has been caused by land use changes, especially the destruction of woods and of soil organic matter.
    http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/land_use/index.php

    I’m all for protecting wildlife habitats and beautiful landscapes, including well-managed farmland (because there are some very good farmers out there, as well as bad ones).

    But climate change is already causing damage to our landscapes and wildlife, and if we don’t do what we can to stop it (or at least slow it down) then our ‘most prized undeveloped countryside’ will be far more damaged than by the alleged ugliness of wind turbines.
    See
    http://www.ukcip.org.uk/essentials/uk-impacts/
    and
    http://www.farmingfutures.org.uk/
    and
    http://www.rspb.org.uk/climate/

    Reply

Add comment

Login to your account.
If you do not have an account, reserve your own name and receive exclusive special offers - just sign up for an On The Wight account

.