Council Budget Meeting: 25 February 2009: A Report

We weren’t able to attend the full Council meeting last week, so many thanks to VB reader Kerri Trickey for sending through her interpretation of discussions held at the full Council meeting. Ed

Council Budget Meeting: 25 February 2009: A ReportI arrived fifteen minutes early, only to find the public gallery was already full – so we stragglers had to sit in a spare room and watch via a TV link up – complete with technical difficulties!

Unfortunately, this meant I missed the first fifteen minutes.

Cuts in School Music Service
The first issue discussed was kicked off by a question from a lady in the public gallery who asked why they were going to “cut off the lifeblood” to school music tuition.

She was not the only one to deplore this move – Cllr Churchman (Democratic Independent) mentioned the IOW Festival and said cutting music funding to schools would “kill the goose that laid the golden egg”.

Cllr Geoff Lumley agreed, declaring, “Music is my life. Life is empty without music” and in his alternative budget pledged to reinstate the whole amount.

However, it was suggested that it was the job of the schools to pay for extra activities such as this, and not for the Council to provide money for them – and that “old people can’t keep shelling out for music lessons”.

The budget included an agreement to reinstate music funding to £85,000.

Council Tax
The 3.5% council tax increase was met with disdain from Cllr Knowles (Lib Dems), but he was quickly shot down by Pugh who declared he “did not need to be lectured about council tax by the liberal democrats”, referring of course to their rate of 14% in 2003.

This would be made easier, said Pugh, by the fact they were not implementing increases in various fees and charges such as parking permits – which will be frozen at 2008 levels.

The budget pledged to put more money into CCTV, free Internet access in all public libraries, the continuation of concessionary bus fares, and the restructuring of the council management, which would save £500,000.

Cllr Stephens proposed an amendment to take £1million out of slippage and put it into adult mental healthcare – specifically building accommodation for such adults, in order to give them a sense of self worth.

Islandwide Transport
He proposed a further £200,000 be taken out of slippage and used to improve transport for elderly people.

It was discussed that although Southern Vectis consistently showed “meanness and greediness”, it was not the job of a profit making company to make things easier for residents – it was the job of the Council with concessionary fares.

Cllr Stephens’ amendment was accepted, and although David Pugh said “installing our own bus company would bankrupt the Isle of Wight on a level the government is trying to do with our country” to gales of laughter – it was mentioned that other companies should be encouraged to set up here, and remove the monopoly Southern Vectis had.

Alternative Budget
Cllr Lumley, in introducing his alternative budget, said it was his instinct to “undercut” Pughs budget, but acknowledged it had some merits he was inclined to agree with. However, he made it clear there were also some major changes.

Cllr Lumley focused on raising money before simply redistributing it.

This included completely scrapping the One Island magazine, which would save £60,000 a year.

He proposed the immediate abolition of Environmental Neighbourhood Officers, and said Alistair Campbell would be proud of the Councils £1million per year media and communications bill. He suggested cutting this by £250,000.

The Conservative budget was agreed with 26 in favour, 9 against and 2 abstentions.

Image: luismi1985

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colin
9, June 2022 7:28 pm

What do you mean “will engage in transactional politics”?

It’s been going on for years surely? Support in exchange for funding? Isn’t that how politics normally works? Or in this particular case doesn’t.

Boris is such an untrustwothy character that he even shafts his supporters.

thedocker18
9, June 2022 7:30 pm

I’d given up the ‘Island Deal’ as a lost cause. If our MP is the only portal we have to Westminster, he has to be voted out.

Justin Case
9, June 2022 8:03 pm

Richard, I am, by instinct, wanting to side with you, but I’m disturbed by your lack of political acumen. Your projection of how this weeks events will effect a future outcome at the so-called ‘Island deal’ is wilful. It actually won’t make a jot of difference because the decision about what will happen was made a long time ago. It just remains for someone to announce what… Read more »

Fenders
9, June 2022 9:30 pm

Bob Seely must be getting increasingly desperate, particularly after saying at the last general election, ‘judge me by my results’. Clearly the reason many islanders voted for Bob was his promise about delivering the island deal, but after 3 years it is nowhere to be seen. So he talks instead about the Islandline, which delivered a few secondhand trains, and the £48 million for our hospital, that… Read more »

henry
9, June 2022 9:36 pm

The Tories will be wiped out at the next general election.

VentnorLad
Reply to  henry
9, June 2022 9:53 pm

I’d love to be able to share your confidence! The Tories are appalling. Dishonest, self-serving, incompetent, corrupt… But when will the opposition give us their alternative vision? What radically different strategy do they have to reform our crumbling society? How will they repair the damage inflicted upon our national reputation overseas? We need answers and I just don’t see the opposition providing them. There seems to be… Read more »

melting
Reply to  VentnorLad
11, June 2022 4:53 pm

I am with you there V.L.

greenhey
13, June 2022 1:25 pm

Sadly no they won’t I have become tuned to the phenomenal levels of gullibility in our voters, and it seems the best we can hope for is a hung Parliament with a Labour/Lib compact of some sort. As for the Island, remember he had a 23,000 majority. In my view that was undeserved, but it was the case. He may see that reduced substantially but he won’t… Read more »

Stuart George
Reply to  greenhey
13, June 2022 1:56 pm

I thought the Island was supposed to return 2 MP’s at the next election.

greenhey
13, June 2022 1:30 pm

BTW because we also live elsewhere ( and I have mentioned this before) the funds in the “Island deal” were also offered to other locations. That is, there was only one lump of money but many competing for it not knowing there was a competition. The desperation to kick the (immensely patronising) “levelling up” into life suggests to me that the Island will have fallen further down… Read more »

peter1
15, June 2022 9:08 pm

Conservatism is there to make money. Years gone by there was a world demand for our Engineering Products and consequently at home for Coal and Steel. In those days we had the markets. Everything was produced on the cheap; lack of proper equipment and workforce exploited; living hand to mouth; ring any bells! Eventually the world caught up technically and properly invested in equipment speeding up production… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined