yes graffiti

WightBID vote: 63% of votes said Yes

Sue shares this latest update from Visit Isle of Wight. Ed


We are very pleased to announce that the required statutory mechanism to bring a business improvement district into operation on the Isle of Wight this September has been triggered by a YES vote.

The formation of the UK’s first County-wide BID gives the Isle of Wight a unified stronger voice in tourism at a local, regional and national level.

63% said Yes!
The YES vote was carried by a 63% vote by hereditament and 75% by rateable value of all those who voted.

Therefore, all business categories listed in the WIGHT BID proposal will now be required to pay the equivalent of 1.75% of their rateable value, which will contribute to the funding of the BID programme for a period of five years.

Governance board to be formed
Over the next three months we will begin the process of developing a BID governance board and working parties elected from levy payers large and small, representing different visitor economy business sectors.

David Thornton and his team look forward to delivering the actions and aims laid out in the WIGHT BID proposals ready for the 2017 season.

Securing extra commercial benefits
Meanwhile Visit Isle of Wight’s summer and autumn current marketing and press activity continues as planned. Work will also commence on securing extra commercial benefits for levy-payers with suppliers and regional, national and international media channels. A voluntary scheme to encourage retailers and other mainland and Island suppliers to support the BID investment plan will also be launched by September.

Thanks to supporters
Visit Isle of Wight would like to thank all those who supported the WIGHT BID, and reinforce its determination to do it’s very best for the whole of the Island’s visitor economy, benefiting all who live and work on the Isle of Wight.

Isle of Wight Council Ballot Officer statement

The Wight BID proposal and supporting documentation can be accessed through the Website

Image: molybdena under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
5 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
susan pamela mawhood
26, June 2014 8:23 pm

Thank you so much Seb,I love living on our beautiful island and your vidio confirms its stunning beauty

John Nash
26, June 2014 8:25 pm

A good proportion of the lovely views in this video will be wrecked if the Navitus Bay proposal is given consent. Of more than two thousand eight hundred “representions” made to the Planning Inspectorate, who will be examining the scheme, only about 6 are from Island residents. The rest are from Dorset residents. Why the disparity? Are Islanders simply Holier than Thou, gullible, apathetic, or just plain… Read more »

yjciow
27, June 2014 2:21 pm

@John Nash. Your comment is totally 100% accurate (naive, gullible and apathetic) ((I’m allowed to say that as I am an islander and have first hand experience of all three!)). The Isle of Wight will be wrecked by Navitus Bay – so many people In the West Wight do not realise that they will have their peace shattered. Bournemouth Council have been very active against this proposal… Read more »

bigEars
27, June 2014 6:17 pm

You have to wonder why anybody would seriously consider putting up a silly alternative energy wind farm when we can get all the energy we need by fracking the hell out of the Island instead. Better still, we could cover the Island in solar cells. Or how about a nice nuclear power station? Or a tidal wave barrier (obviously as long as it doesn’t effect the local… Read more »

Caconym
28, June 2014 11:19 am

When a wind farm story appears on the IWCP website, the comments soon fill with anti wind power comments, the authors of which reply in the most obnoxious and objectionable ways should anyone dare to suggest that they don’t really mind wind turbines (not even “support”, merely not object). It is gratifying to see the down-votes awarded to John Nash who, like those on the IWCP, resorts… Read more »

John Nash
Reply to  Caconym
28, June 2014 4:46 pm

My “just plain stupid” remark was, to be sure,ill-tempered and unkind, and was prompted by my sheer disbelief at the lack of submissions (both for and against Navitus Bay) to the Planning Inspectorate. I will not retract my other remarks because they can be shown to be true. And I would add “naive” and ill-informed” to that list. It is no good trumpeting how beautiful the Island… Read more »

kevin1746
Reply to  John Nash
28, June 2014 5:07 pm

Your essentials are not the same as others essentials…I like my lights to go on when I throw the switch and I would like to be responsible for the power that I use, not siphon it off from someone else. I completely support wind farms, Navitus Bay, Tidal and wave generators, thermal and geo thermal and even Nucleur. We have to have alternatives now and no matter… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  kevin1746
29, June 2014 11:51 am

…. and fracking as well Kevin?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  John Nash
29, June 2014 11:02 am

JN – Where were you & your friends during the decade of decay at Frank James? Could you even have been around when the E.Cowes Castle home of the real John Nash was neglected & demolished? Do you litter pick, or beach clean? Do you clear Himalayan balsam & other invaders? Do you cut back growth spreading on to our foot & cycle paths? Do you plant… Read more »

John Nash
Reply to  Steve Goodman
29, June 2014 1:22 pm

As far as I know I am real. I do not hide behind a pseudonym. Some of my “environmental” credentials are as follows: 1. I have never owned or driven a car or any other motorised vehicle. 2. Since a very young age I have detested rampant consumerism. I regard this as a perversion of the human spirit. 3. I have only ever flown on a long… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  John Nash
30, June 2014 11:21 am

John; looking at what you wrote, we have a lot in common, & I’m sorry that we are currently unable to agree on the need to allow temporary or permanent wind turbines in places we value. I am also sorry that the wording I used didn’t allow for the possibility that you hadn’t used as a pseudonym the name of the famous former island resident. Coincidentally, I… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  John Nash
29, June 2014 12:00 pm

You think the best way to convince the undecided and ambivalent over to your point of view is to hurl insults at them?

Generally the opposite is true. Tell someone who is sitting on the fence that they are “stupid” and “naive” because they don’t believe as you do and they will almost always come out in complete opposition to you.

Tanja Rebel
29, June 2014 11:34 am

I think we can all agree that energy conservation needs to be the Island’s top priority. In conjunction with that we need good renewable energy sources and I think that the Isle of Wight is ideally placed for solar and tidal energy schemes. With regards to off-shore wind, if this is put in a responsible position then it can contribute too. The currently proposed position is too… Read more »

Tanja Rebel
30, June 2014 6:41 pm

The wind farm will be far less of a threat to our Coastal Heritage if it is put further out to sea. The Developers had that option, but chose the spot nearest to the coast. This is understandable from a cost-perspective, but – as stated – we need to balance our insatiable thirst for ever more energy against the (timeless) value of our Heritage. If we put… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined