Campaigners against the closure of Brading CE Primary School met with Cllr Joe Robertson MP

Campaigners meet with MP to save Brading CE Primary School ahead of Cabinet vote

Campaigners hoping to prevent the closure of Brading CE Primary School have met with Councillor Joe Robertson, Conservative MP for Isle of Wight East, ahead of a critical Cabinet vote next Thursday. 

The Member of Parliament for Isle of Wight East told the meeting of local people (on Friday 14th March 2025) he believes Brading Primary has a “very strong case” for staying open. 

The meeting at the Brading Community Partnership hub on the town’s High Street, was organised by Nick Binfield and Kate Benson, and attended by 20 campaigners.

Binfield: Deprivation is a serious concern
The group is calling on the IW council’s Cabinet members to look very carefully at issues of deprivation and social impacts on Brading’s families; and the quality of the consultation process.

Local campaigner and parent with two children at the school Nick Binfield says,

“There is huge concern around the proposed closure from the parents and families that I speak with on a regular basis around the lack of transparency and a constant moving of the goalposts for the criteria.

“Deprivation is a serious concern – 50 per cent of children at Brading receive free school meals and there are also issues with transport to the two alternate schools, both under the two-mile radius so there will be very limited help for families with transport costs, significantly impacting the most disadvantaged.

“We feel that Brading has been singled out and our concerns have not been listened to or considered in any depth.”

Campaigners say they have consistently applied pressure by writing to councillors, submitting questions, asking questions at council meetings.

Robertson: My view is that none of the three of them should close
Councillor Joe Robertson MP says,

“I’ve taken a position on each of the schools in the East Wight which are due to potentially close. My view is that none of the three of them should close, but for different reasons.”

“Brading has a very strong case for staying open and I’ve made my opinions very clear both publicly but also behind the scenes directly with the Council.”

Also attending the meeting was a representative from the Diocese of Portsmouth which owns the school. 

Sanders: The Bishop has been very public in his opposition
Rob Sanders, Deputy Director of Education, indicated that should the decision to close Brading go ahead, the body would challenge the process through the education adjudicator and judicial review.

Rob Sanders, Deputy Director of Education, Diocese of Portsmouth,

“Our position has been very clear throughout that we object to the selection of our three schools, the Bishop has been very public in his opposition and we’ve had some very robust meetings with councillors.”

“We understand the Council’s challenge and that there is a need to review surplus school places but there’s been no clarity of criteria for identifying schools and there’s been no consistency.”

“We are very serious about our intentions to challenge that decision, should it be made.”

The campaign group intends to rally the many local supporters to fund-raise towards helping the Diocese fund any Judicial Review. 


News shared by Nick, on behalf of Save Brading School. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cynic
21, May 2012 6:53 pm

Another example of the fine art of the bureaucratic two-step to aid a “Preferred Bidder”.

Are we really to believe that the Preferred Bidder would go away from this juicy contract if there was a delay?

This is just another version of the old sales ploy “If you don’t buy it now, the price will go up!” used by doorstep salesmen the world over!

Chris Wilmott
21, May 2012 7:32 pm

Why don’t these people speak English? Can it be because they don’t want to be understood? There was once a Plain English movement, but clearly it has yet to affect the Council’s petty bureaucrats.

James P
Reply to  Chris Wilmott
22, May 2012 8:56 am

Agree entirely. You just know that when they use words like ‘disapplication’ that there’s a fudge involved. Why not just say it’s cancelled?

Ryde a Wight Swan
Reply to  Chris Wilmott
22, May 2012 9:13 am

Beware of any intiative that talks about “engineering solutions” or anyone who says “going forward”.

Steve Goodman
22, May 2012 8:59 am

For those who may have missed it, the proposed change to a discredited PFI road maintenance contract for 25 years is not yet a certainty. As I said to those responsible, in the days when it was still possible to ask awkward questions at public council meetings, when will this council start taking it’s duty to taxpayers seriously? Why should only a few here today, gone tomorrow… Read more »

Cynic
22, May 2012 9:34 am

I wonder what the National Audit Office’s view would be on a multi-million, 25 years contract being decided by “Delegated Decision” and avoiding scrutiny?

One notes that the “Business Plan” was not attached to the “disapplication” (sic!) decision.

daveq
Reply to  Cynic
22, May 2012 11:28 am

Telescope to blind eye job?

Island Monkey
22, May 2012 12:45 pm

This report clearly says ‘submit the final business case to the Department of Transport.’ Does this mean this is not yet a done deal, despite the previous claims of the council?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Island Monkey
22, May 2012 2:54 pm

Yes.

playingthenumbers
22, May 2012 1:10 pm

A £1bn project, paid for by taxation & borrowing. Then more taxation to pay for the borrowing, more cuts to things like education or health & more disposal of assets whose revenue cannot keep pace with the repayments demanded of the taxation & borrowing. For what? Is it within the purview of any of the elected members to explain how, in the modern world this project can… Read more »

Paul Miller
Reply to  playingthenumbers
22, May 2012 1:53 pm

The concept of odious debt [which is repudiated later because it is deemed taken on without consent] – much like of vaunted ‘PFI’ is described in the case of Greece in the excellent documentary “Debtrocracy”

playingthenumbers
Reply to  playingthenumbers
6, June 2012 10:59 am

Does the chancellor of the exchequer read VB? The headline in the Independent online today ‘Osborne’s latest plan: ask Britain’s savers for money’ Treasury to fund infrastructure projects by selling us ‘growth bonds’ suggest he might. If we recalibrate the PFI deal, strip out the ridiculous finance costs the provider (us eventually) will have to stump up, bring the project back to something approaching excitingly large but… Read more »

adrian nicholas
22, May 2012 3:00 pm

Cynic said; This is just another version of the old sales ploy “If you don’t buy it now, the price will go up!” used by doorstep salesmen the world over! Well in this case, i’ll wager the price will go up regardless. Another case of neo-liberalist profiteering using private leveraged debt subsidized by public debt to ensures trebles all round for those involved in this ‘project’. Makes… Read more »

Cynic
22, May 2012 3:15 pm

Having run major multimillion projects in my former professional life, I know two things from experience. Firstly, central and local government are incapable of defining the project tightly enough, leading to inevitable contract changes that always increase the price. In fact, the negotiating strategy of some companies is to win the public service contract with a low price, knowing full well that they can make up the… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined