woman and baby looking at a christmas tree, both wearing santa hats

HMRC reminds new parents to claim Child Benefit in time for baby’s first Christmas

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) reveals more than one million families have claimed Child Benefit using the new digital service launched earlier this year.

New parents are reminded if they claim online or through the HMRC app, they could get their payment in time for their baby’s first Christmas.

What you will receive
Child Benefit is worth £1,331 a year for the first child and £881 a year for each additional child.

It can be claimed online at GOV.UK  or via the HMRC app just 48 hours after registering a baby’s birth and parents typically receive their first payment within three working days.

Claim for Child Benefit digitally
Parents are opting to claim for Child Benefit digitally because it is quick and simple to do. Latest figures show 87% of new claims each month are via the app or online – ensuring more parents are getting their cash quicker.

Downloading the free HMRC app makes managing claims even easier too. Families can use the app to track payments and update their details on the go – from changing their address or bank details, to seeing when their next payment is landing.

Lloyd: Get cash in your bank account as soon as possible
Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC’s Director General for Customer Services, said:

Having a baby is a busy and expensive time, but claiming Child Benefit online or via the app means you’ll get cash in your bank account as soon as possible.

“Claim now and you could get your first payment in time for your baby’s first Christmas.

“Download the HMRC app today.

Claims can be backdated
Claims can be backdated by up to 12 weeks, so the sooner families claim, the better. Child Benefit is typically paid every four weeks.

To get started, parents will need to create an online account for HMRC services. To make a claim, families will need:

  • child’s birth or adoption certificate
  • bank details
  • National Insurance number for themselves and their partner, if they have one
  • child’s original birth or adoption certificate and passport or travel document, for children born outside the UK

HMRC has released a YouTube video which explains what new parents need to do and how to make a claim.

Watch the video

High Income Child Benefit Charge
If either parent has individual income between £60,000 and £80,000, the higher earner will be subject to the High Income Child Benefit Charge. For families who fall into this category, the online Child Benefit tax calculator provides an estimate of how much benefit they will receive, and what the charge may be.

If families claimed Child Benefit before 6th April 2024, and the higher earner had an individual income of over £50,000, they may have to pay the tax charge for 2023 to 2024. If they need to pay the charge, they must register for Self Assessment.

Restart your payments
Families who were subject to the High Income Child Benefit Charge when the threshold was £50,000 and opted out of payments are able to restart their payments quickly and easily online or via the HMRC app if they choose to.

There’s more to Child Benefit than just payments though, as claimants receive National Insurance (NI) credits which count toward their future eligibility for the State Pension. This can help people who are not in paid employment and not receiving NI credits through their employer or other routes, such as Universal Credit.

A person living in a household subject to the High Income Child Benefit Charge will still receive NI credits if they claim Child Benefit but choose to opt out of receiving payments.

Claiming Child Benefit also makes sure the child automatically gets their National Insurance number when they turn 16.


News shared by Natalie on behalf of HMRC. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cynic
21, May 2012 6:53 pm

Another example of the fine art of the bureaucratic two-step to aid a “Preferred Bidder”.

Are we really to believe that the Preferred Bidder would go away from this juicy contract if there was a delay?

This is just another version of the old sales ploy “If you don’t buy it now, the price will go up!” used by doorstep salesmen the world over!

Chris Wilmott
21, May 2012 7:32 pm

Why don’t these people speak English? Can it be because they don’t want to be understood? There was once a Plain English movement, but clearly it has yet to affect the Council’s petty bureaucrats.

James P
Reply to  Chris Wilmott
22, May 2012 8:56 am

Agree entirely. You just know that when they use words like ‘disapplication’ that there’s a fudge involved. Why not just say it’s cancelled?

Ryde a Wight Swan
Reply to  Chris Wilmott
22, May 2012 9:13 am

Beware of any intiative that talks about “engineering solutions” or anyone who says “going forward”.

Steve Goodman
22, May 2012 8:59 am

For those who may have missed it, the proposed change to a discredited PFI road maintenance contract for 25 years is not yet a certainty. As I said to those responsible, in the days when it was still possible to ask awkward questions at public council meetings, when will this council start taking it’s duty to taxpayers seriously? Why should only a few here today, gone tomorrow… Read more »

Cynic
22, May 2012 9:34 am

I wonder what the National Audit Office’s view would be on a multi-million, 25 years contract being decided by “Delegated Decision” and avoiding scrutiny?

One notes that the “Business Plan” was not attached to the “disapplication” (sic!) decision.

daveq
Reply to  Cynic
22, May 2012 11:28 am

Telescope to blind eye job?

Island Monkey
22, May 2012 12:45 pm

This report clearly says ‘submit the final business case to the Department of Transport.’ Does this mean this is not yet a done deal, despite the previous claims of the council?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Island Monkey
22, May 2012 2:54 pm

Yes.

playingthenumbers
22, May 2012 1:10 pm

A £1bn project, paid for by taxation & borrowing. Then more taxation to pay for the borrowing, more cuts to things like education or health & more disposal of assets whose revenue cannot keep pace with the repayments demanded of the taxation & borrowing. For what? Is it within the purview of any of the elected members to explain how, in the modern world this project can… Read more »

Paul Miller
Reply to  playingthenumbers
22, May 2012 1:53 pm

The concept of odious debt [which is repudiated later because it is deemed taken on without consent] – much like of vaunted ‘PFI’ is described in the case of Greece in the excellent documentary “Debtrocracy”

playingthenumbers
Reply to  playingthenumbers
6, June 2012 10:59 am

Does the chancellor of the exchequer read VB? The headline in the Independent online today ‘Osborne’s latest plan: ask Britain’s savers for money’ Treasury to fund infrastructure projects by selling us ‘growth bonds’ suggest he might. If we recalibrate the PFI deal, strip out the ridiculous finance costs the provider (us eventually) will have to stump up, bring the project back to something approaching excitingly large but… Read more »

adrian nicholas
22, May 2012 3:00 pm

Cynic said; This is just another version of the old sales ploy “If you don’t buy it now, the price will go up!” used by doorstep salesmen the world over! Well in this case, i’ll wager the price will go up regardless. Another case of neo-liberalist profiteering using private leveraged debt subsidized by public debt to ensures trebles all round for those involved in this ‘project’. Makes… Read more »

Cynic
22, May 2012 3:15 pm

Having run major multimillion projects in my former professional life, I know two things from experience. Firstly, central and local government are incapable of defining the project tightly enough, leading to inevitable contract changes that always increase the price. In fact, the negotiating strategy of some companies is to win the public service contract with a low price, knowing full well that they can make up the… Read more »