st catherines cottages car port and storage
© ERMC

Proposed car port deemed ‘visually intrusive’ and rejected by planners

Plans for a car port and garage on the edge of an Isle of Wight village, denounced as ‘unacceptable creeping development’, have been rejected following local opposition.

Natasha Moore’s application was turned down by County Hall planners this week on the grounds that it would have a ‘serious adverse impact’ on the character of the St Catherines Cottages, Blackgang Road site in Niton, the surrounding area and the Isle of Wight National Landscape (IWNL).

Planned materials
Mrs Moore’s proposed structure included a weathered light grey timber frame, a ‘natural slate roof’ to match the existing property, solar panels on and in the garage’s roof, a black rainwater drainage system and weathered grey ‘natural timber cladding’, according to her agent, ERMC Ltd.

Niton and Whitwell Parish Council, the IWNL and a neighbour opposite lodged objections before Christmas.

IWC: Would result in a visually intrusive, dominant and prominent addition
A council report explaining the refusal said,

“The proposed garage and car port due to its position, size, design and appearance, would result in a visually intrusive, dominant and prominent addition within the site which would have a serious adverse impact on, and would fail to conserve or enhance, the character of the site and surrounding area and Isle of Wight National Landscape (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty).”

Rayner: “Unacceptable creeping development”
Blackgang Road resident Carolyn Rayner said,

“This is a form of unacceptable creeping development, and as such is completely out of keeping with the rural environment of Niton, given its location in an area of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.”

NWPC: “Quite imposing” and “, especially from the road and “totally out of character”
A spokesperson for Niton and Whitwell Parish Council said,

“Whilst we have no objection to people wishing to have a car port or storage area, we feel it must be in keeping to the surrounding area, especially in the Isle of Wight National Landscape.

“They are quite imposing, especially from the road and totally out of character to the existing buildings.

“We would also be concerned with any additional light pollution.”

Highways service provider Island Roads made no objection to the application but recommended a condition be attached that the development is used only for private vehicle parking or domestic storage.


This article is from the BBC’s LDRS (Local Democracy Reporter Service) scheme, which News OnTheWight is taking part in. Some alterations and additions may have been made by OnTheWight. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
4 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stewart Blackmore
15, October 2014 6:24 pm

Only 6 in public gallery 3 of whom from Ventnor!

davidwalter
15, October 2014 7:02 pm

I’m on way to Shanklin Theatre… Star Prize. Very hard decision ;-)

Stewart Blackmore
15, October 2014 7:51 pm

Seems there’s a chance Carisbrooke College may be in danger implies Cllr Whitehouse.

Geoff Lumley
16, October 2014 11:21 am

Of note (politically) last evening were: 1. UKIP councillors don’t support Living Wage. 2. Nor do some local Tories, even though Cameron and Boris do! 2. Tory opposition leader can’t manage to stay for the entire meeting 3. Cllrs Priest & Gilbey voting with Tories in election of Planning Chair. What was the point of them standing for election in 2013 if that’s going to be the… Read more »

MamaLu
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
16, October 2014 3:45 pm

Voting with the Tories could well be the rule now.

Have you seen the other news story on here about your emails to (and from) them?

Is Rush Close a smokescreen for their alleged coup?

Colin
16, October 2014 1:45 pm

The “living wage” is just the latest emotive buzz phrase which ultimatelty is not going do anyone any good. It is only going to stoke up inflationary pay increases as those above them seek to maintain their differentials. I put it in the same category as child poverty and carbon footprint. i.e. rubbish. Is it any wonder that UKIP are gaining in popularity by not suppoting such… Read more »

MamaLu
16, October 2014 3:56 pm

Just seen an article that said fears that Carisbrooke High School might be closed was raised at the meeting last night.

Guess who raised this? Chris Whitehouse.

I bet there are lots of fearful parents now. Thanks, Chris. Yet again you put out misinformation that breeds fear and anger for no reason.

wight knight not
16, October 2014 4:08 pm

or perhaps he is ‘clearing the ground’ for Christ the King College in the future? Both schools are/were due for new schools. Take one out of the equation….simples

Cynic
Reply to  wight knight not
16, October 2014 4:45 pm

Housing development value of the land at Carisbrooke College could be upwards of £84 million, perhaps providing another nice little earner for AET of a public asset awarded gratis?

Geoff Lumley
16, October 2014 5:03 pm

This school isn’t an academy and although a foundation trust school still belongs to the Council. Medina is the same. AET have Ryde and Sandown

Cynic
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
16, October 2014 5:37 pm

Thanks for the clarification Geoff. So IWC still os the freeholder of the “school’s” land and buildings?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
16, October 2014 6:01 pm

Isn’t Carisbrooke College part of Gove’s £2 billion Priority School Building Programme, a PFI scheme that involves private contractors paying upfront for schools and hospital buildings, then leasing them back for up to 30 years?

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Cynic
17, October 2014 9:12 am

Sorry, not sure about that, but will endeavour to find out.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Cynic
28, October 2014 1:08 pm

Answer I have:-“Carisbrooke College, along with Ryde and Christ the King are part of the Priority School Building Programme 1 (PSBP1). The original intention was that PSBP1 would be PFI funded. However, there was not enough interest from the private sector so the investment programme has had to be funded through grant and contracted in the normal way.”

wightwonders
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
28, October 2014 1:16 pm

I’m very impressed you came back to answer this as you promised!

Cynic
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
28, October 2014 2:39 pm

Thanks Geoff! However was not PSBP relaunched as the PF2 PFI initiative with an overall estimate of £52 million for the IoW (Ryde College, Carisbrook College and CTK)? “The draft contract issued by the Treasury PF2 Equity Unit anticipates the “Third Party Equity Provider” being a person who is not related to the building contractor or FM contractor under the principal sub-contracts.” (see PF2 – HoldCo/ SPV… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Cynic
17, October 2014 9:11 am

Yes, unless the last lot sneaked something through at the last minute that I missed !

Cynic
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
17, October 2014 9:18 am

Thanks Geoff. if Carisbrooke is part of the Priority School Building Programme then a PFI contractor might well hold a long leasehold even though IWC retains the freehold.

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
17, October 2014 4:47 pm

Tory friends don’t like suspicions to be raised, do they? :-))

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined