Restrict second home ownership, remove housing sites in Bembridge and Freshwater and renew emphasis on brownfield, not greenfield development.
These are some of the changes some of the Isle of Wight Council’s scrutiny body would like made to the Island’s planning blueprint.
Setting planning policy
The draft Island Planning Strategy (DIPS) is coming before councillors for approval later this month, a year after it was first tabled.
The plan, once approved, will include policies developers have to abide by and earmark priority housing sites.
The ’tilted balance’
The current strategy the Isle of Wight Council uses is out of date and means the authority is penalised by the ’tilted balance’, which favours development unless there is something majorly wrong.
Some final changes to the DIPS have been suggested by members of the corporate scrutiny committee (CSC), however.
Committee recommendations
It believes the cabinet should adopt them before the DIPS goes to full council for approval.
These include:
- Ensuring sustainable development is on brownfield sites in areas where it is most needed by increasing the number of houses expected to be built in Newport, at Camp Hill, Newport Harbour and a new site, Newport Riverside, which is publicly owned land incorporating County Hall, the police station and the currently empty area at the bottom of Pyle Street.
- Protecting the environment by only developing greenfields if it is absolutely necessary — removing housing sites in Bembridge and Freshwater as the CSC argues there is no local need.
- Restricting second home and short-term let ownership of new build properties.
Conservatives to vote against if changes not approved
It is understood, should the amendments be refused, Conservative councillors at County Hall would vote against the DIPS, potentially blocking its adoption and delaying the process longer.
The need to adopt the planning strategy has been highlighted by multiple councillors as well as the Local Government Association (LGA) in a recent peer review.
LGA: Strategy must be urgently finalised and adopted
The LGA said the authority needed to urgently finalise and adopt the strategy because without one it was possible developments could happen that are ‘deemed not in the public interest and outside the needs of local people’.
However, reacting to the comments, Cllr Joe Robertson, Conservative group leader, said he rejected the suggestions councillors should back any plan for the sake of having one, especially now the amendments have created something ‘wholly more beneficial’ to Islanders on the housing waiting list and for the environment.
Robertson: I cannot see any good reason for cabinet to reject them
Cllr Robertson said he was pleased with what the cross-party CSC has presented which provide a “greener plan and with more genuinely affordable housing opportunities for Islanders who need them most.”
He said,
“I am confident the CSC will back the amendments and I cannot see any good reason for cabinet to reject them.
“If cabinet does, I will be making the argument to all councillors that full council should reject a poorer plan when a better draft exists. If the matter has to be returned to cabinet to look again then so be it.”
Article edit:
9am 3rd Sep 2022 – ‘Some’ added to the headline and second para to reflect comment left by Cllr Lilley
This article is from the BBC’s LDRS (Local Democracy Reporter Service) scheme, which News OnTheWight is taking part in. Some alterations and additions may have been made by OnTheWight. Ed
