Solent WASPI Rachel Reeves

Solent WASPI group feels betrayed by government’s snub of Ombudsman’s advice

On Tuesday, 17th December, the Government made an unprecedented political choice to ignore the clear recommendations of an independent watchdog which, nine months ago, ordered Ministers to urgently compensate women born in the 1950s for mistakes made by the Department for Work and Pensions in failing to properly communicate life-impacting changes to their State Pension age.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) concluded in March 2024 that the Government’s failure to directly inform affected women was Maladministration, resulting in financial hardship and emotional distress for millions.

However, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall apologised on behalf of the Government but refused to pay compensation.

Solent WASPI members shocked, angry and betrayed
The announcement has left members of Solent and Isle of Wight Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) – including nearly 11,000 on the Isle of Wight – feeling shocked, angry and betrayed.

Group Coordinator, Shelagh Simmons, said,

“This is a bizarre and totally unjustified move which will leave everyone asking what is the point of an Ombudsman if Ministers can simply ignore their decisions. The Ombudsman’s report was laid before Parliament for MPs to deal with. Bypassing Parliament in this way means the Government has effectively set itself up as judge and jury. That cannot be right.

“We also dispute the Government’s assertion, repeated by Keir Starmer at Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions, that ‘90% of women were aware of the changes’.

“The 90% figure cited by Ministers refers only to women having a vague awareness of the principle that State Pension age changes might happen for others in the future.”

Madden: It’s an insult to millions of 1950s-born women who were blindsided by these changes
WASPI Chair, Angela Madden, said,

“This isn’t just misleading; it’s an insult to millions of 1950s-born women who were blindsided by these changes. The Ombudsman’s findings were based on rigorous evidence showing that 60% of women had no idea their own State Pension age was rising.

“The Government’s attempt to cherry-pick data to suggest otherwise is spreading dangerous misinformation, plain and simple.”

“The fact that 90% of women had some general awareness of potential changes in the future does not mean they knew this would impact them personally.

“That is exactly why the Ombudsman identified Maladministration and why this Government’s continued attempts to muddy the waters are so unacceptable.”

Hilsenrath: Our role is to hold the Government to account
In a statement, Ombudsman Rebecca Hilsenrath commented,

“The Government’s decision not to accept our recommendations in full is disappointing and will have been hard for the women to hear. ]

“Our role as a Parliamentary body is to support Parliament to hold the Government to account.

“Throughout this investigation, DWP indicated it would not comply with our recommendations and that is why, nine months ago, we asked Parliament to intervene.”

Simmons: Labour MPs have been vociferous in calling for justice
Shelagh Simmons added,

“Throughout our long years of campaigning, we have been heartened and encouraged by the support shown by many MPs, including those now prominent members of this Government. They have been vociferous in calling for justice, and been happy to have their photos taken with pledge boards confirming their support.

“Among them are Chancellor Rachel Reeves (pictured above with members of Solent WASPI at an International Women’s Day Event in Portsmouth) and Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall (pictured below with Shelagh Simmons). The Prime Minister has made much of restoring trust and integrity in politics. But what the Government has done this week is the exact opposite of that. And the claim that we have a Government run by ‘the party of social justice’ rings extremely hollow today.”

Shelagh continued,

“The actions of the Government in this case should not just be a matter of concern for the WASPI women directly affected. It should also be of concern to everyone when a Government plays fast and loose with a process designed to provide recourse for mistakes made by the State.  it sets a dangerous precedent.

“An overwhelming majority of MPs back WASPI’s calls for fair compensation and all options remain on the table. Parliament must now seek an alternative mechanism to force this issue onto the order paper so justice can be done.

“The Prime Minister has not heard the last of this issue. The Labour Government must act now to address this ongoing injustice. We are not going away.”


News shared by Shelagh on behalf of Solent WASPI. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Luke
23, November 2012 3:38 pm

The response from the Council that they are relying on the regulations is very worrying. Firstly, are they suggesting that France does not have similar regulations? Secondly, are they ignoring the fact that Eurovia are reported to be guilty of gross negligence? It doesn’t matter what the regulations are if they are not being followed. Thirdly, just because something is legal doesn’t make it safe. It used… Read more »

downwind resident
23, November 2012 5:15 pm

Well done Julia Hill and WRAP for bringing this information to our attention. Even Cllr Pugh can’t call this factual report from the French Appeal Court ‘Scaremongering’ (can he?) If Eurovia/Vinci can show utter contempt for one of their own workers and have only compensated his widow after four years following an Appeal Court finding against them what chance do our local communities have on the Isle… Read more »

Black Dog
23, November 2012 6:09 pm

If the Council go ahead with this application, ignoring all the hard evidence that says the plant is a danger to the surrounding houses and the environment, Julia Hill and WRAP should position themselves for a Judicial Review and mount a legal challenge. Given the density and physical area involved I am sure we can raise enough funds to ensure we meet all the legal requirements in… Read more »

Matthew James Martin
23, November 2012 8:14 pm

My thanks also goes to Julia Hill and the other WRAP campaigners for all of your continued investigative research and efforts, in highlighting all the issues and concerns with the Eurovia Asphalt plant site planning application. I give my overall support to the words above by James Luke , ‘Downwind Residents’ and ‘Black Dog’ Myself and all Islanders want to see improved Highways and a successful PFI… Read more »

I do not believe it
24, November 2012 10:44 am

I keep asking myself – “Would I buy a secondhand car, or, for that matter, asphalt from Eurovia?”

On the whole, and after careful reflection of life’s experiences, I think I would source elsewhere.

I wonder if anyone in County Hall is of a similar mindset?

hussar
Reply to  I do not believe it
27, November 2012 3:45 pm

Are you presupposing that any of that unholy crew have a mind for anything other than their own wellbeing?

adrian nicholas
6, December 2012 6:17 pm

Cllr.Gorge Brown; “Emissions are controlled very strictly and specifically by legislation. This is a very important aspect of the planning application which is before the local authority. This is a very important aspect of the planning application which is before the local authority and can give every assurance it will be dealt with the greatest care and greatest attention.”’ Strange, given that, initially when filing the planning… Read more »

downwind resident
Reply to  adrian nicholas
7, December 2012 8:31 am

Cllr. Brown may need to reconsider his alleged statement. He cannot rely on the data submitted by the applicant because it is only based on theoretical figures not hard facts from empirical measurements. In fact recent objections indicate misleading acoustic data submissions so what else? Ergo,if he relies on false data to determine the Permit and/or Planning applications he will not have exercised due care. Should an… Read more »

James Luke
Reply to  downwind resident
7, December 2012 3:40 pm

The data that I have seen in the planning application has all been theoretical. The noise data is not taken from a real Asphalt Plant – it is some form of design specification that is far better than any existing plant. The emmissions data is all theoretical. Apparently data isn’t available for their existing plants. Existing Air Quality data is not available as the Council don’t monitor… Read more »

downwind resident
Reply to  James Luke
8, December 2012 7:01 pm

Does anyone believe Eurovia or their so called Consultants?

Please advise soonest.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined