Speedway:

Speedway: Wightlink Islanders up for the cup

Thanks to Bryn for this update from the Wightlink Islanders Speedway team. Ed


They travel to the midlands later today for the first leg knowing that with four of their current seven man side out injured, nobody expects them to be the side who will have their name engraved upon the trophy so they really have nothing to lose whatever the result both tonight and in tomorrow’s second leg on their own circuit that will get underway at 7pm.

Co-manager Chris Hunt said,

“Given that Adam Ellis, Brendan Johnson, Darryl Ritchings and Dan Stoneman have all succumbed to season ending injuries, having joined Byron Bekker and Brandon Freemantle who suffered similar fates earlier this year, nobody will expect us to win the cup.

“That means the six man side we have managed to piece together for the matches tonight and tomorrow will have no real pressure placed upon them as all myself and co-manager Kev Shepherd will be drumming into each of them, is to go out on track and ride to the best of their ability.

“If they do, well you never know what might happen as we showed in both legs of the semi-final replay against Mildenhall.”

Image: Lee Jordan under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt
11, May 2012 12:10 pm

I guess it’s too expensive to run due to its very busy caseload.

Thomas C.
11, May 2012 12:13 pm

Check the definition and you’ll find this entry:

Ethical standards: annoying things that get in the way of selling things off cheap to your mates.

hammerjammer
11, May 2012 1:31 pm

I really don’t think it will make any difference, if the council leader screams vile personal abuse at the MPs partner in public, and that is deemed appropriate and not to have broken the rules what’s the point in the committee. This lot are a law unto themselves and bahave in a manner that puts 2 fingers up to us the people they are supposed to represent.… Read more »

John R
11, May 2012 2:15 pm

If you remove it you can not fall foul of it, or be answerable to it.

Problem solved!

Chris Wilmott
11, May 2012 3:04 pm

You only need an Ethical Standards Committe if you set yourself some ethical standards. No surprises, then, that this particularly unrepresentative Council sees no need for sich a body. Have these people no political antennae? Or maybe they just like the idea of making themselves a laughing-stock.

adrian nicholas
11, May 2012 4:31 pm

Surely the NOLAN committee ethical standards still still apply regardless of whether an ethical standards committee exists? Perhaps a reminder of these and a clear golden thread of accountability and interaction with ethical standards needs to be made explicit before full council when the constitutional amendment is sought? Wonder also – if and to whom the chairman will be allowing supplementary questions on this matter at public… Read more »

FOXY34
11, May 2012 7:40 pm

Would not cost so much money if it were used by people in the know for what it was originally intended, and not to solve political/personal differences at a micro local level. Current system is abused by those who know about it to their own advantage. People who should be using it are not aware of it’s power.

unbeleivable scenes
11, May 2012 10:48 pm

predictable comments. and dare i say it, a sensationalist headline. Technically, yes, the standards committee is being abolished. The important quote is this: “Alternative arrangements will need to be adopted with regards to a Code of Conduct and processes for dealing with complaints where it is alleged that this new Code of Conduct has been breached.” So, yes, the standards committee will go. Then it will be… Read more »