Current measures at the bridge including scaffolding and supports

Ten weeks of roadworks and land closure at Skew Bridge

A project to repair a wall that retains a section of the main Sandown to Shanklin road near Skew Bridge is to begin next week (Monday 17th Oct).

The project, to be carried out by Island Roads on behalf of the Isle of Wight Council, is scheduled to last ten weeks.

It follows a previous incident when a vehicle collided with the wall causing damage to the structure.

Lane closure
During work it will be necessary to close a lane to ensure the safety of workers and pedestrians.

This will mean that temporary traffic signals will be in operation at this location for the duration of the work.

Skew Bridge

Boulter: We thank motorists in advance for their understanding
Senior Project manager Jason Boulter said,

“The work is necessary to ensure the integrity of what is an important part of the strategic road network,

“While we have scheduled the work for outside of the holiday season, the temporary traffic lights will inevitably have an impact on some road journeys so we thank motorists in advance for their understanding.”


News shared by Gavin on behalf of Island Roads. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cynic
6, May 2014 1:41 pm

Heaven forfend that they are returned with “RA” replacing the “I”. :-)

ThomasC
6, May 2014 2:14 pm

Maybe someone thought they had been left lying around making the place look a mess and returned them to UKIP party HQ using their Freepost address? It still mystifies me why UKIP want to put up candidates to stand in the elections for MEPs – surely if they get in they should not claim their £80k salary and not go to the meetings if they’re so keen… Read more »

Robert Jones
6, May 2014 2:30 pm

Theft of posters is a bit of a new one on me; defacing posters has always been common, on the island and everywhere else. Maybe look upon this as a political statement rather than get the collective UKIP knickers in a twist. I wonder how far I’d have got with the police back in the day, if I’d reported that someone had pulled our posters down…. Not,… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  Robert Jones
7, May 2014 3:18 pm

Back in the olden days when Steven Ross was MP I had heard that the Liberal agent went round on a truck & removed Tory posters by the hundreds. The Tories used to put them up the night before the poll & they were all gone by morning, but to be fair they did not go around squealing about it like UKIP have. Welcome to the Isle… Read more »

Robert Jones
Reply to  Mark Francis
7, May 2014 3:43 pm

It happened all right! Whether it was Steve Ross’s agent or not I don’t recall – but he had willing helpers…

Mark Francis
Reply to  Robert Jones
7, May 2014 4:51 pm

As Claude Raines said in Casablanca
“I am shocked. Truly shocked…”

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
7, May 2014 4:53 pm

LOL!

retired Hack
6, May 2014 3:25 pm

I notice that the billboards were on posts on the beach. If they were below high-water mark (not possible to tell from the picture), then they weren’t on private property, they were on public land. It would still be theft, of course – unless they were removed by one of the island’s many beach wardens (lol). In any case, I rather fancy UKIP will quite enjoy having… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  retired Hack
7, May 2014 3:21 pm

Flotsam & jetsam on the foreshore probably belongs to the Queen dunnit? Why not ask her.
(or is that just surgeons & that?)

Mark Francis
Reply to  Mark Francis
8, May 2014 8:21 am

“sturgeons”…surgeons washed up on the beach would be just awful…and not a little sad.

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
8, May 2014 8:28 am

The NHS would collapse even faster without them though! :-)

Mark Francis
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 8:34 am

Sturgeons?
I don’t recall getting any caviar when I last went in.

Should I complain?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 8:37 am

No- you missed the caviar with your extra “t”! :-))

tryme
Reply to  Mark Francis
8, May 2014 8:37 am

I was puzzling about that, Mark, thinking the Queen probably does like to have her own surgeon, but all the same…would she be looking to the IW for hers? Some washed-up surgeon, though?

Mark Francis
Reply to  tryme
8, May 2014 8:53 am

And this is why it so sad. One moment at the top of your profession and the next just a slight tipple of the surgical spirit, a wee sniff of ether, and its a downward spiral…

tryme
Reply to  tryme
8, May 2014 8:58 am

Don’t you mean sturgical spirit?

tryme
Reply to  tryme
8, May 2014 12:05 pm

Unlike me, you believe you know their reason, when someone doesn’t respond to you.

tryme
Reply to  tryme
8, May 2014 3:28 pm

(My above comment was put in the wrong place).

kevin1746
6, May 2014 3:56 pm

Maybe if the didn’t field such obnoxious bigoted candidates they would be treated with more respect…how can anybody publicise a party whose representatives say things like downs babies should be aborted, women should stay at home and rape in marriage is impossible

Mark Francis
Reply to  kevin1746
8, May 2014 9:34 am

Perhaps UKIP were hoping for a sturge in their support

tryme
Reply to  Mark Francis
8, May 2014 9:37 am

Sturtistically, it ain’t gonna happen.

Cynic
Reply to  tryme
8, May 2014 11:21 am

OwOwOw! Stop this PUNishment!

Cynic
6, May 2014 4:22 pm

As a political party, UKIP is in its adolescent stage with all the tribulations that go with teenagers- inflated ideas of own worth, angst for the future, rebellion against grown-ups, pushing the social envelope by displaying attitudes that shock and so on. At this stage in the game, UKIP is a “protest” party, catering for the growing number of “Anyone but Cameron and Milliband” voters Of course… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
6, May 2014 4:38 pm

If the “Red Arrowers” are UKIP acolytes, perhaps their action demonstrates an unwillingness to debate their policies and just resort to showing discontent with anybody who might disagree with them?

While that continues, they can hardly be described as belonging to a political party, can they?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
6, May 2014 5:42 pm

QED! :-))

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 11:23 am

Deciding you know why you are being down-arrowed – comforting no doubt, but self-deluding.

No stranger to unexplained down-arrowing yourself, Cicero.

Cynic
Reply to  tryme
7, May 2014 12:18 pm

You are right tryme! :-))

Often people take the easy way out of resorting to down-arrows rather than debating the point.

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 12:39 pm

You confidently (again) misunderstand, Cicero. My comment wholly applied to you.

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 1:03 pm

Moi? You are mistaken, tryme

When have I ever used a down-arrow rather than argue the point?

You know my style well enough by now to realise that.

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 1:39 pm

A lot of people don’t have the time you clearly do have, to post throughout most days, Cicero.

As the facility is there for arrowing, best respect people wishing to quickly register some disagreement, grounds for which not always evident to you; rather than spend time they don’t have arguing about it. Seems fair enough to me.

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 1:42 pm

That’s true tryme! One can only hope the down-arrowers would return to discuss the point when they have the time.

So you do now accept that I personally am not a down-arrower as you alleged?:-)

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 1:56 pm

You can hope, but not control, Cicero. We are all different.

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 11:23 am

My hopes were dashed tryme- they didn’t come back.:-)

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 11:44 am

Were you an only child, Cicero – you seem to expect the world to revolve around you …

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 11:59 am

Nope- member of a large, caring family thankfully.

Like you, It is just I get niggled when politicians try to make use of social media for purely PR purposes.

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 12:03 pm

That’s what I meant to say, Cicero. Member of a large family were you – you seem to struggle for attention …

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 12:11 pm

Unlike me, you believe you know their reason, when someone doesn’t respond to you.

(Correct position this time)

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 12:47 pm

No… I speculate about their reasons just as you are speculating about me.

I do not seek attention, just intelligent conversation- something that appears to be becoming more scarce on OTW as people more and more frequently reach for ad hominems (as you have just done) and down arrows instead.

Oh well! Thanks for all the fish- it was fun while it lasted!

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 1:19 pm

I respond to what people say, of course, but, (unlike you), do not speculate on the reasons if there is no response. You’re welcome to the fish, (as before).

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
8, May 2014 1:38 pm

[Click….bzzzzz…. Sorry this number is unobtainable…]

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 4:00 pm

Soon be as many down-arrows as fell on the French at Agincourt! :-)) Maybe parts of Shakespeare’s Henry V speeches could be used in UKIP PR? “O that we now had here But one ten thousand of those men in England That do no work to-day!” “That he which hath no stomach to this fight, Let him depart; his passport shall be made,” ” Old men forget;… Read more »

Robert Jones
Reply to  Cynic
6, May 2014 4:58 pm

UKIP if you want to: this old git’s not for keeping.

This post doesn’t mean much, to be entirely honest, but it just tickled me.

kevin barclay-jay
Reply to  Cynic
6, May 2014 5:26 pm

Farage is one of the nutters :)

Cynic
Reply to  kevin barclay-jay
6, May 2014 5:46 pm

Sad to say, but Farage is the only party leader with a smidgeon of charisma today.

Cameron is doomed to be “Little Boy Blue”, Milliband looks like (and might well be) a CIA cyborg, Clegg (who?)

peaceful_life
Reply to  Cynic
6, May 2014 8:45 pm

@ Cicero.

The only party leader?…or the only party leader (apart form the main 3) being given media attention and air time?

Cynic
Reply to  peaceful_life
6, May 2014 8:54 pm

True! Maybe because he is more entertaining than the others despite his policies?

Don Smith
Reply to  kevin barclay-jay
6, May 2014 7:45 pm

Yes! Maybe a nutter, however, he’s certainly got the gift of the gab.

UKIP promise to give me back my country, that’s good enough for me.

peaceful_life
Reply to  Don Smith
6, May 2014 8:39 pm

@ Don.

I’d like the think post was irony, sadly…I fear not.

Robert Jones
6, May 2014 4:59 pm

How to kill a joke that was feeble to start with – KIPPING, not keeping……

Perhaps I do need a nice kip………

tryme
6, May 2014 5:54 pm

Very apt to talk of a “wave” of political oppression, on a beach. Though to say it is “active within society” sounds like an over-egged but rather sinister-sounding threat. Scary extrapolations from minimal evidence are familiar in extremist politics, trying to panic people into support. I would have thought UKIP would want to avoid that kind of comparison. Myself, I don’t want our beaches to be littered… Read more »

Cynic
6, May 2014 6:05 pm

Compare and contrast… a ) (6 may 2014)Rose -Lynden-Bell “UKIP are a party of free speech, and I am fearful of the motives that lie behind actions that seek to deny that freedom”.; . b.) (16 Jan 2014) UKIP Education spokesman MEP Derek Clark…. “We will still ban Al Gore’s video for use in schools if I’ve got anything to do with it. I will not have… Read more »

Cynic
6, May 2014 6:15 pm

UKIP following the “shoot-in-the-foot-at-any-cost-to-get-a-namecheck” PR policy of another party seen frequently in OTW? :-))

middling
6, May 2014 7:12 pm

Bit of a strange place to put posters; Farage may be as slimy as an eel but, as far as i know, marine creatures don’t actually have the right to vote.

Don Smith
6, May 2014 7:38 pm

All this anti UKIP is doing UKIP a world of good. I’d never heard of Mr Farage and UKIP until I saw mention of them in the media.

Being rude and insulting to any official political party just may do them more good than harm.

Is Farage a slimy eel? Perhaps! I do not know; however, if he is, he’s not the only politician…

Cynic
Reply to  Don Smith
6, May 2014 7:48 pm

Mmmm! ‘Nuff said, Don! :-))

peaceful_life
Reply to  Don Smith
6, May 2014 8:26 pm

@ Don. Your words here are interesting, Don…. ‘I’d never heard of Mr Farage and UKIP until I saw mention of them in the media’ Let’s read that again…. ‘I’d never heard of Mr Farage and UKIP until I saw mention of them in the media’ And again…. ‘I’d never heard of Mr Farage and UKIP until I saw mention of them in the media’ Once more…..… Read more »

Don Smith
Reply to  peaceful_life
8, May 2014 7:36 pm

And again, ‘I’d never heard of Mr Farage and UKIP until I saw mention of them in the media’. Isn’t that the way we all get to get to know about things? I’d like to call it ‘News’. I shall not repeat the last paragraph; I usually get the gist of things first time. Take note; UKIP will have many gains, and if this multimillionaire[Cameron]from Eton carries… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  Don Smith
8, May 2014 9:16 pm

Currently around 12% of the population is “ethnic” (non-white) and 87% is white. The figure of 30% is a forecast for 2050 (I shall be 92- dead or alive).
Scotland is 8.3% but accounts fr 38% of National debt.

tryme
Reply to  Don Smith
8, May 2014 9:29 pm

We’re not talking about the spread of a disease, Don, we’re talking about people sharing a locality and getting to know each other in the usual way. Like UK ex-pats abroad. Things change amd always have done, and by the time 2050 comes it will just be another version of normality.

peaceful_life
Reply to  Don Smith
8, May 2014 10:13 pm

@Don. No, it’s not ‘news’ to pluck something from obscurity and give it blanket coverage. The job of the news is to reflect public opinion, not influence it, that’s the job of education. You take note… that UKIP don’t have a single elected UK MP, no intelligent policies on anything and even it’s own one-trick isn’t addressed with the real issues of wage levels and profiteering. You’re… Read more »

iain mckie
6, May 2014 8:27 pm

Hi Tryme, given that these two banners, which cost members well over £100, were taken by someone on private property in the night with a knife, I believe that this incident is newsworthy and not over-egged. It is a worrying state of affairs. After all, where does this behaviour end? Perhaps someone will take offence to a poster/placard or banner in someone’s garden, or even in their… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  iain mckie
6, May 2014 8:52 pm

Pointing out to sea, at whom were the banners aimed, Iain?

Passing sailors, ferry passengers or to repel immigrants swimming ashore?

While you are here, perhaps you could rationalise the dichotomy of UKIP policies on free speech as stated recently by the local party Chairman (surely that should be just “Chair” these days?) and the UKIP MEP, Derek Clark?

tryme
Reply to  Cynic
6, May 2014 10:22 pm

When a poster is addressing another one, Cicero, consider leaving the ‘Reply’ spot to them, putting your own comment elsewhere.

Cynic
Reply to  tryme
7, May 2014 10:33 am

Yet again, you find a reason to avoid answering a question about UKIP policy, Iain- not impressive!

Mark Francis
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 3:27 pm

Farage-class battlecruisers, ploughing their way across the far-flung depths of the narrow seas, defending our Empire from johnny-foreigner in the steampunk universe of UKIP’s collective imagination, where we won at Suez and Ian Smith became Viceroy of the Bechuanaland Protectorate I shouldn’t wonder.
Huzzah!

tryme
Reply to  iain mckie
6, May 2014 10:17 pm

Then again Iain, perhaps they won’t.

peaceful_life
6, May 2014 9:10 pm

@Cicero.

There is a time and a place for entertainment and this, from, Nigel…

“I have no idea whether CO2 emissions are contributing to climate change.”

…just isn’t funny.

Policies are the whole point, yet…UKIP don’t even have a manifesto, well…not one that, Nigel, hasn’t disowned.

I think people need a little bit more than the foolish ignorance of a court jester.

iain mckie
7, May 2014 7:32 am

Not one post that condemns this criminal act.

Cynic
Reply to  iain mckie
7, May 2014 10:39 am

All theft is wrong including pinching the UKIP banners!

Happy now Iain?

Now pls answer the questions on UKIP policies.

(BTW be aware that politicians who stick their heads over the parapet in blogs looking for PR name-checks should be very careful- as two of your political opponents have recently found out on OTW.)

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
7, May 2014 11:03 am

UKIP silence on policies remains deafening. :-)

Robert Jones
Reply to  iain mckie
7, May 2014 3:58 pm

Oh for Heaven’s sake … it was very naughty and they shouldn’t have done it. But if you think this was bad, you should have been around in 1974 when the Tories and Liberals were slugging it out and Labour was in the early stages of being crushed between them – we followed each other around removing each other’s posters, poster teams went out at night to… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  iain mckie
8, May 2014 9:07 pm

I don’t.

Mr Einsteins Ghost
7, May 2014 11:06 am

“…it suggests that a wave of political suppression is active within society”

Says Rose Lynden-Bell
A tad over-dramatic Rose.
Personally, I think it suggests two UKIP posters have been removed for reasons unknown. No more, no less.

Braveheart
7, May 2014 11:16 am

Unfortunately for the islands residents there seems to be a growing resentment amongst a certain element of people, who think they have the rights to either spend their time defacing other people’s property, or stealing it. The reasoning could be based on boredom! Especially as youth centres have either been closed or scaled back, jobs are not plentiful, and people are now becoming dependent on charity food… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  Braveheart
7, May 2014 12:30 pm

See my post at 10:19 today condemning the theft.

BTW Not foreshore (owned by Crown Estate) but private property, as claimed by UKIP and, worse,”at night with a knife”.

peteiow
7, May 2014 7:47 pm

I’m surprised UKIP haven’t blamed a Johnny Foreigner Islamist from Brussels for this heinous crime. Personally I find a prospective councillor wanting to stab someone more offensive than a couple of posters costing a hundred quid going missing. Given Iain is so disappointed we haven’t joined in unanimous condemnation of the thieves I wonder what he thinks of a fellow party member wanting to commit actual bodily… Read more »

Robert Jones
Reply to  peteiow
8, May 2014 3:14 pm

Romanians! Coming over here, nicking our jobs, or alternatively benefits, seducing our tender womenfolk with their foreign ways, stealing our election posters…..

Must be Romanians. Or Bulgarians. Or a hit-squad from the European Parliament.

Ed Mew
Reply to  Robert Jones
9, May 2014 12:15 am

Robert! your last comment has touched me personally. I seemed to upset a few people last week with my views. However, when was the last time you got a taxi? They are here and working as taxi drivers. I constantly get told by locals that these people from Europe and elsewhere are ripping them off. I personally complained (like many others) to the licensing dept. only to… Read more »

tryme
9, May 2014 12:49 am

We are also “these people from Europe”, Ed Mew. That’s a dehumanising turn of phrase, to my mind, lumping people together in a way that we would not want to be spoken of in another country. There are good reasons why taxi drivers should be working under proper regulations, but they will learn that we take this seriously. In the meantime, if you don’t want to sound… Read more »

Ed Mew
Reply to  tryme
9, May 2014 11:11 pm

Tripe/tryme So sorry, however I have friends that come from other lands or originate from other countries! namely Thai,Polish, Finish, Greek, Africans, the Ukraine and India. If I was racist they would not be my friends! So please stop trying to be the leader of this site, and occasionally try listening to other peoples views. You may not like what I say, but I live in the… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Ed Mew
9, May 2014 11:39 pm

In your keenness you have jumped the gun, Ed. I didn’t say you were racist, I was responding to your own comment that people are afraid to be seen as racist. Talking about how we express ourselves seems a legitimate subject to me. I’m not sure why you think either of us is prevented from giving our views, except you seem to make it clear I shouldn’t… Read more »

Ed Mew
10, May 2014 8:27 pm

Tryme, just to show I don’t hold a grudge or take things too personal (seriously), I wonder if in a way of making up over our differences, you would be interested in buying two UKIP posters at a discounted price???? :)