Wightlink Confirm Drop-Trailer Service To Be Axed

We wrote last night about news we’d received regarding changes to the drop-service provided by WightLink.

Despite only writing to them late last night, they responded swiftly this morning with the following statement.

Wightlink can confirm that the Wightlink Board has undertaken a review of the Portsmouth to Fishbourne Drop Trailer Operation. The review focussed on a number of key issues, such as the available parking space and port congestion at peak periods, the number and nature of recent incidents involving drop trailers, the involvement of the Environmental Health Officer regarding the noise levels generated by this operation at Fishbourne as well as the impact of drop trailers upon deck space and turnaround times.

Consideration of all these issues has led to the Board taking the decision to phase out the drop trailer service commencing 31st January 2011. This will allow our valued business customers sufficient time to make alternative arrangements.

There will be no compulsory redundancies as a result from this business change. Wightlink intend to consult fully, both on a collective and an individual basis with the eight Tug Drivers directly affected by this decision, who will be given the opportunity to either leave the Company under a voluntary arrangement or to be redeployed within the business, initially covering positions that have been traditionally employed on a seasonal basis.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
12 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian
26, November 2010 9:35 am

It will negatively affect deck space a little, but probably not turnaround times: having a driver for each trailer must be faster than all the back-and-forth by ferry crew drivers. And I doubt it will affect in-store prices: they already pay for the ferry crossing, and the extra time required for a driver to deliver all the way to us personally is no more than the time… Read more »

Intentionally Blank
26, November 2010 11:48 am

I wonder if wightlinks ‘valued buisness customers’ will make alternative arrangements with red funnel? Are wightlinks board trying to run the company under?

Mo
26, November 2010 11:54 am

The only reason people would use this service is because its cheaper than driver accompanied crossings? I cant see how ending it wont cost the supermarkets and haulage firms more money and if it costs them more, sure as eggs are eggs it’ll cost us more. Still, what do Wightlink care.

Intentionally Blank
26, November 2010 12:01 pm

just a thought. perhaps if prices go up in supermarkets it will revitalise the market for local produce. I would always rather buy a potato or whatever that has been grown on the island, but cost prevents me doing so. If local produce comes down in price a little and supermarket prices go up a little, the gap might narrow enough to take some trade from supermarkets.… Read more »

JC
26, November 2010 1:58 pm

This has cost cutting written all over it. 8 less staff (seasonal cover, yeah right), no vehicle maintenance and no insurance.

And @IB, that would be great if it did boost local produce. Although we need a slaughterhouse on the Island though. And some local tomatoes we bought were sent off Island to be packaged, and brought back to be sold.

GOM
27, November 2010 9:50 am

ALSO POSTED ON PREVIOUS WIGHTLINK STORY: What’s everyone on about. These are businesses trying to turn a profit for their shareholders – they’re not public services. It’s like the criticisms of Southern Vectis. If we want transport to be public transport, let’s lobby the politicians and vote for a party that is willing to reverse some of the damaging privatisations. Alternatively let’s raise some capital and start… Read more »

Intentionally Blank
Reply to  GOM
27, November 2010 11:35 am

yes, they are buisnesses trying to turn a profit. That being the case, why discontinue a service for which there is only one competitor, red funnel? Why not try and make that service better and take trade from red funnel? Why not try and make their service better across the board? The only possible answer is that the board are not competent enough to do so. You… Read more »

GOM
Reply to  Intentionally Blank
27, November 2010 11:45 am

But it’s very unusual for Wightlink and Redfunnel to go head-to-head on anything. They tend to operate in collusion as an oligopoly and only compete on marketed price packages rather than services. So it will be interesting to monitor Red Funnel’s reaction and whether they keep their Drop Trailer operation.

If they do it would certainly make Intentionally Blank’s comments on H&S appear a possibility.

Christopher
27, November 2010 6:05 pm

“In other words, rather than investing money to bring their health and safety and noise control up to the standard it should be at, they would rather discontinue the service” What on earth are you on about? Instead of turning everything into a rant about Wightlink, try and consider what your proposing. You cant remove the fundamental risks of moving trailers back and forther quickly in a… Read more »

Intentionally Blank
Reply to  Christopher
27, November 2010 6:21 pm

well in their statement, wightlink say themselves that Environmental Health have been involved. So clearly they are unable to meet the requirements of Environmental Health on noise. Yet Red Funnel seem able to since no similar announcement has come from them. It is a dangerous activity, and everything should be done to make it as safe as possible. Wightlinks statement says that this is happening due to… Read more »

John R
27, November 2010 7:44 pm

I do not think this decision will affect the prices in the supermarkets as their transport costs are spread across the whole group. ie: the price of a particular product is the same in the IOW or Scotland as it is in the store next door to the distribution centre. It will however affect the prices transporting other a lot of other goods, for instance building materials,… Read more »

Haulage Bob
27, November 2010 11:05 pm

Sorry, you are wrong. The big supermarkets DO vary their prices from store to store around the UK. I know this because I complained to trading standards when I discovered they did it and to my surprise, they told me it was standard industry practice and legal. They all do it, depending on the strength of local competition. If you want low prices, you need to live… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined