Ventnor Audit Report: £35,000 of Rent Discounts and More

OK, so we looked earlier at what the auditors had to say about how the concession contract was unlawfully awarded to (the now Cllr) Perks, next we move onto how it was managed with regards to rent reductions, changes to terms of agreement and other miscellaneous items.

Ventnor Audit Report: £35,000 of Rent DiscountsRent agreed in January 2007
On 8th January 2007, Cllr Graham Perks, the former concessionaire at the Winter Gardens, signed a letter accepting terms and conditions of the concessionaire agreement.

Outlined in this contract, which commenced on 1st February 2007 and ran for five years (with an option to extend for a further two years), were details of the agreed rent.

The schedule of rent payment was as follows:

  • £600 per week for the first 13 weeks
  • £800 per week for the next 13 weeks
  • £1,000 per week thereafter

The £1,000 per week rent was to be reviewed every two years and it was stipulated that the review should NOT permit a reduction below the £1,000 per week figure.

Massive rent discounts
Within Appendix One of the report, auditors reveal that Cllr Perks only ever paid the agreed £1,000 per week figure once.

The report tells us that Cllr Perks went to the Ventnor Town Council (VTC) several times requesting rent discounts which over the period of his concession totalling approximately £35,000.

£35,000 of rent discounts in less than three years

Rent discounts given before discussed at council
The usual format for the series of requests for rent discounts was for Cllr Perks to write to Town Clerk, John Farrant, with his request. Protocol was for this request to be taken to the VTC for consideration.

However, in one instance, on the 23rd September 2008, John Farrant wrote to Cllr Perks granting another rent reduction the day before it was even considered by the Committee.

As an officer, John Farrant clearly had no authority to grant this rent discount.

Another rent reduction
Nearly ten months after signing the contract, Cllr Perks wrote to John Farrant again requesting another rent reduction. This time stating he was dissatisfied with the pre-agreed arrangements.

Paperwork on file shows Cllr Perks felt the agreed rental figure was not comparable to other pubs in Ventnor when looking at rents, location and facilities.

For those who aren’t aware, Cllr Perks has been the landlord of several pubs in town. This experience would give him a fair understanding of what was a reasonable rent for the premises would be.

VTC pay utility costs and more ….
Although Cllr Perks paid a weekly (reduced) rent to use the Winter Gardens, the Ventnor Town Council covered all of the cost of gas, electricity, water, business rates and refuse disposal, figures totalling a substantial annual cost for any business.

The report also reveals that the VTC ended up paying for repairs to a bottle cooler, glass washer and ice machine owned by Cllr Perks.

10% bar split abandoned
The contract that was signed stated that on the night of any events promoted by the VTC, Cllr Perks should pay 10% of bar takings to the VTC.

It was suggested that the contract should be changed as it was claimed that it was “too difficult to be certain how much of the bar income arose from the promotion and how much came from diners and regular customers.”

Again this was carried out, with the 10% of takings being kept by Cllr Perks..

Instead Cllr Perks simply provided a rider (drinks) for any performing artists on those nights.

Further instalments on the findings of the report to follow.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
15 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cindy
1, February 2010 12:45 am

Doesn’t look good does it? You would have thought that with such a massive rent reduction Cllr Perks would have been able to pay his staff minimum wage and holiday pay too, as he was legally required to do, but he did not. No holiday pay. He should also have been able to pay National Insurance contributions, but at least one of his ex staff at the… Read more »

Trevor
Reply to  cindy
1, February 2010 10:04 am

Wow, that’s terrible. I guess she reported him for that did she?

ventnorfan
1, February 2010 10:50 am

Mr. Perks is a great Mine Host who knows how to run a pub, providing good beer, good food and good entertainment. What more can one ask ? Without him at the helm the Winter Gardens would have degenerated into a Civic white elephant.

Trevor
Reply to  ventnorfan
1, February 2010 11:04 am

“Without him at the helm the Winter Gardens would have degenerated into a Civic white elephant”

How do you know that? The report says there were four other people interested in running the bar, any one of them could have turned the place around.

N0.5
Reply to  ventnorfan
1, February 2010 11:57 am

He didn’t realise that £1000 was completely unfeasble as a rent.

Running a pub or bar requires a good business head as well as great front of house skills

The Auditor
1, February 2010 12:22 pm

What an interesting story. The other current story lines covering the concessionaire, the concession and the murky dealings regarding the rent and the (recent) departed Town Clerk suggest that this may be the tip of a very large iceberg. Did the Town Clerk and the concessionaire jump ship before the brown substance hit the fan? There are many financial models available for working out whether or not… Read more »

The Auditor
1, February 2010 12:45 pm

The original contract for the concession was for 5 years, so what about the remaing two years rent of £104,000? That’s a tidy sum and coincidentally would pay for the roof repairs the the WG which IWCC can’t afford………..

GJ
2, February 2010 6:28 pm

I am Vice Chairman of a(thankfully)non political Parish Council in Berkshire and what I don’t understand in this sorry tale is why the annual report of the external auditor did not reveal this irregular arrangement in the financial year ending April 2007 (Councils have to be audited each year) as the contract was in existence then. Either the auditor did not spot it or the Councillors took… Read more »

Simon Perry
Admin
Reply to  GJ
2, February 2010 8:47 pm

Thanks for your comment GJ. Interesting to get a perspective from another parish council – especially one over the water.

Which part do you think should have been spotted? The fact the contract had been broken with the rent reductions, or something else?

Do they go into that much detail in an audit?

S

GJ
Reply to  Simon Perry
4, February 2010 8:10 pm

If I am reading this correctly, there was a clear conflict of interest when Councillor Perks was awarded the catering contract, and I can’t see how VTC could award a contract to a councillor. I don’t imagine that he voted for it himself, but surely VTC could see that there could be conflicts in the future. It is not as if the contract was for a one… Read more »

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  GJ
4, February 2010 8:15 pm

Mr Perks was a concessionaire long before he became a councillor, which was in June last year.

Shobba
3, February 2010 10:17 am

Despite the many and various failings, I fail to see how any money was really ‘lost’ by VTC. The £1,000 weekly rent was never affordable. Cllr Perks should never have agreed to it.

The Auditor
Reply to  Shobba
9, February 2010 9:17 am

Sorry but I cannot agree on this point. The contract was a legally binding agreement and whilst I accept that the rent was probably not affordable (with the benefit of hindsight – always an exact science) it still does not excuse the concessionaire from meeting his contractual obligations. Therefore the VTC have been party to reduction in the revenue of the WG. If you rented a flat… Read more »

Ventnor Audit Report: Unlawful and Undocumented Selection of Winter Gardens Concessionaire - Isle of Wight News from OnTheWight
9, May 2017 12:09 pm

[…] Audit Report also revealed that Graham Perks was let off £35,000 in rent (and more) from the contract that he […]

Steve Goodman
9, May 2017 12:54 pm

Thank you for the reminder.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined