Those who have been following the legal challenge against Birmingham City Council for cuts to adult social care may have already heard news of yesterday’s ruling. Indeed, it has been commented on here on VB.
In yesterday’s judicial review, Mr Justice Walker declared the council’s plans to cut adult social care was unlawful and should be axed.
Lawyers for four disabled Birmingham residents took up the legal challenge after the council stated that only those with ‘critical’ needs would be supported. The legal case challenged that decision, claiming those with ‘substantial’ needs should also be supported by the council.
Flawed consultation
Mr Justice Walker said, “The consultation had not involved any attempt to look at the practical detail of what the move to ‘critical only’ would entail”.
The ruling will set a precedent, ensuring other councils abide by their legal (not to mention moral) duty to protect vulnerable elderly and disabled people.
The BBC have a video response of the leader of Birmingham City Council, who claims the ruling will have no effect their budget.
Image: Walknboston under CC BY 2.0
