Council To Force Registration For Public Questions At Council Meetings

At next week’s Full Council meeting a number of changes to Constitutional Issues will be debated and voted upon by members. One such area that will see a change is public question time.

Filling out formIf the changes are voted through, in future there’ll be a requirement to register before being able to ask an oral question. At the moment, you can just turn up and ask during the 15 minutes allocated at the beginning of council meetings.

Must register within allotted time
You’ll have to provide details of your name, town or village of residence, email (or home) address and the topic of the question.

Not only that but you’ll need to ensure that you do this during the 20 minutes allotted period. That is, between 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting up until ten minutes prior to the start of the meeting.

If you arrive less than ten minutes before the meeting starts, you won’t be able to ask an oral question. Unwelcome news for those relying on public transport and may usually turn up just moments before the meeting starts.

The council’s reasoning for change
The paperwork states ….

Group Leaders have recently considered amendments to the current arrangements for public questions at the Council and Cabinet meetings. This is in the light of recent events when it became increasingly apparent that there was confusion in some quarters over who should answer questions (whether submitted in writing or orally at the meeting) and furthermore that more confident and regular attendees in the public gallery may, through their determination to ask a question, assume priority (without good reason) for asking a question when compared to those attending a meeting to ask a question for the first time.

It was also felt that there needed to be more information made available to the Chairman when the meeting gets to the public question time section, to ensure that the proper formality and structure of proceedings is retained.

It is therefore suggested that the following changes to the Constitution are made:
(a) Making it clear that questions (either written or oral) will usually be answered by either the Leader, or relevant Cabinet Member, or another member as determined by the Chairman. This acknowledges that questions, which must relate to the policy or budget, should only normally be answered by those members with executive (Cabinet) responsibility for such areas.

(b) That those wishing to submit an oral question at a meeting follow the procedure as set out in Appendix D to this report of pre-registering the fact that they wish to ask an oral question just before the commencement of the meeting. This will enable the Chairman to deal with questions on a fairer basis and enable the Chairman to call members of the public forward in the order in which the requests to ask oral questions have been received.

New arrangements
The proposed new arrangements for “submitting oral questions at meetings of Council and Cabinet” are detailed as follows:

a. That the front desk “opens” for public wishing to attend the meeting half an hour before the meeting.

b. When signing in at the front desk as attending a Council or Cabinet meeting each member of the public is asked whether they wish to ask an oral question at the meeting AND / OR if the member of the public indicates themselves that they wish to ask an oral question.

c. In the circumstances that a member of the public wishes to ask an oral question, they be given a form to complete which details their name, town / village of residence, email (or home) address and the topic of the question (not the question in full, unless they wish to provide this).

d. These forms will be consecutively numbered in the order handed back.

e. The time for registering will be from 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting up until 10 minutes prior to the start of the meeting.

f. At the expiry of the 10 minutes prior to the start of the meeting these sheets will be collected and given to the Chairman of that meeting, in numbered order.

g. When the meeting gets to the agenda item for public questions, and if time allows after dealing with any written questions, the Chairman will then ask those who have submitted an oral question (in the numbered order that they were handed back) to put their question and as the subject matter is known at that stage the Chairman should be able to indicate which member will reply.

h. The option of supplementary questions for both written questions and these registered oral questions will be available, at the Chairman’s discretion.

i. A person who has submitted a written question will not also be able to submit an oral question at the same meeting.

j. Once the defined period of time allowed for questions has passed (and assuming the Chairman has not extended this) then all unanswered oral questions are left at that (unless Chairman exercises his / her discretion to extend).

k. No oral question will receive a guaranteed written response, unless the member responding indicates as such.

l. The procedure set out above, along with guidance information, will be made available from a weblink to the agenda and also to those individuals who register to ask written or oral questions.

Image: igb under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
21 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt
8, May 2012 4:43 pm

Sounds pretty fair to me

cynic
Reply to  Matt
8, May 2012 5:20 pm

Not a bad idea- but why cannot the registration be done on-line?

Lars Torders
8, May 2012 5:24 pm

This sounds sensible. Are you sure that the council thought it up?

ThomasC
8, May 2012 6:17 pm

So just to get things clear, a written question remains a written question and an oral question becomes a short-notice written question. There are no unscripted oral questions. Obviously the new system will have some way of handling those who are dyslexic or – worse – illiterate to ensure our political system is inclusive of all? Or at my guess it won’t, because it’s a panic motion… Read more »

Island Monkey
8, May 2012 7:09 pm

Sorry, but the last council messed around like this in its dying days. The council hate answering questions. Actually, all council’s hate answering questions. They do not believe they should have to justify their awful crass decisions. Those of us who value democracy should reject this crude attempt to stifle debate. We should also show our appreciation to the awkward squad who regularly turn up and ask… Read more »

island wide
8, May 2012 7:11 pm

Oh dear! What are this council frightened off. I am surprised that the Chairman is allowing this. Any Chairman worth their weight in salt should be able to answer questions off the cuff or direct to someone who can. It seems to me that although many are elected only a few can speak, and then say only what they are allowed to. Shame on you IWC and… Read more »

keithybaby
8, May 2012 7:41 pm

Point g – if time allows after written questions i.e. these take precedence – what is the protocol for written questions? Is this not a vehicle to stifle public debate? How are written questions to be submitted? What time limits are there?

JohnC
8, May 2012 8:08 pm

I thought the whole point of oral questions is that they are oral. If the Council do not like this or answering to a live audience, democracy and the right to question are dead.

adrian nicholas
8, May 2012 8:10 pm

The problem is surely that questions made in response to previous Cabinet member replies cannot now be followed up. This is clearly exampled by Cllrs. Pugh & Jones-Evans pathetic attempt at a ‘stitch up’ of Newport PC. Despite having to move her agenda item – some glaring inaccurate facts were prevented from being answered by Cllr.Geoff Lumley despite public questions AND a paper circulated by Geoff to… Read more »

JohnC
8, May 2012 8:14 pm

Maybe we are turning into an Island version or Putin’s Russia,with a sham democracy.

Alan Bennett
8, May 2012 8:36 pm

I see this as a further attempt to make it so difficult for the Public to ask questions thatmost won’t bother. I agree with comments above that an honest Council has nothing to fear from Joe Public.

Stephen
8, May 2012 9:01 pm

At first sight this is a way of ensuring democracy in action BUT the cynic in me sees this as a way of stifling genuine public questions. How so? Well if the queue to register to ask questions was packed out with loyal Councillor supporters well they could all asking tame or planted questions. For example during Parliamentary Prime Ministers Questions there are always ‘toadying’ loyal questions.… Read more »

Fromer Drone
Reply to  Stephen
8, May 2012 9:13 pm

There has already been accusations of planted questions and there’s certainly plenty of toadying going down at County Hall meetings.

Mr J
8, May 2012 10:17 pm

Yes, I seem to recall the Tory Chairwoman asked a toadying question just a few months ago. Of course didn’t bother to say she was the Chairman of the Island conservative party. Must’ve slipped her mind.

You can’t trust any of them. If they want change they must think it will make things easier for them.

Former Drone
Reply to  Mr J
8, May 2012 10:28 pm

At least when former councillor Alan Wells (the new Conservative Chairman) stands up to ask a question, we’ll all know who he is.

john luckett
8, May 2012 10:49 pm

Not impressed at all! I firmly believe that a member of the general public should have the right ask any appropriate question they like to the Full Council; Scrutiny or Cabinet without having to supply it in advance and to expect a proper answer – it is almost a subtle form of censorship and another way of avoiding awkward moments and difficult questions and of course the… Read more »

JohnC
Reply to  john luckett
9, May 2012 4:26 am

Quite right,it is a form of censorship. It is obviously(by design I think) a barrier to stop the public asking questions and it is an erosion of the ability for the public to ask pertinent questions in real time,so the public questions can be ignored.Another step towards destruction of our democracy and the formation of a big brother dictatorship on the Isle of Wight.

Tanja Rebel
8, May 2012 11:22 pm

Hmmm… I wonder why this is instigated. Are our rulers frightened of too many awkward questions? Instead of creating more bureaucracy they would do well in extending the existing public question time so that everybody gets the chance to put their question, written or oral. Then again, heaven forbid, that would mean democracy!

playingthenumbers
Reply to  Tanja Rebel
8, May 2012 11:31 pm

TR, I think the IWC are suffering from another delusion of adequacy.

Victor Meldrew
9, May 2012 12:35 am

From it’s existing constitution:
Article 14 pp62

(i) respect for human rights;
(j) a presumption in favour of openness

Hmm!

Jackie
9, May 2012 10:14 am

This bit bothers me (in italics part a)

This acknowledges that questions, which must relate to the policy or budget,

What does this mean?

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined