Blueprints

Atherfield Bay developers lodge appeal with Planning Inspectorate

In February 2014, members of the Isle of Wight Planning Committee rejected a proposed development at Atherfield Bay for 95 units of accommodation.

The application by Sandy Lane Resort Limited was then revised and re-submitted, once again attracting large opposition.

Reasons for refusal
The first application was refused planning permission on the basis that members concluded the “application by virtue of its size, scale, mass and density would fail to protect, conserve or enhance the integrity of the natural environment and would adversely impact on the surrounding landscape”.

Sandy Lane Resort Limited have now lodged an appeal with the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol against the original refusal.

Strengthen opposition
Local councillor, Bob Seely told OnTheWight,

“What seems to have happened is that they saw opposition to the scheme getting stronger, with both Parish Councils (Brighstone and Shorwell) now coming out against, as well as the AONB strengthening its opposition, and many more local objectors.

“The basic problem remains the scale of the development. It is very large for such a sensitive site, yet the developers are refusing to scale down the development. Rather than face the high chance of defeat with the new application, it seems they now feel their best chance is to object to the original refusal.

“As far as I can see, I think many residents feel that this is a cynical attempt to play the planning system. Clearly I am concerned as I want to make sure that residents have a voice and that the system is perceived to be fair to all sides.”

Have your say
Residents who wish to comment on the Appeal must write to Darren Cryer on teamp7@pins.gsi.gov.uk quoting reference APP/P2114/A/14/2223277 by 16th September 2014.

You can also comment online by following this link and searching under the postcode PO38 2JD

Image: Keoni under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cynic
19, August 2014 10:35 am

Company checks on “Sandy Lane Resort Ltd” and its associated companies make interesting reading.

ThomasC
Reply to  Cynic
19, August 2014 11:52 am

Save us doing the searches – what’s the detail?

watchdog
Reply to  Cynic
19, August 2014 12:14 pm

A simple online check shows that the company has registered office in Nottingham, was incorporated in 2011, changed its name from WB Barney Properties Ltd in July 2013. It has a share capital of #100 (sorry, my keyboard doesn’t have a pound sign), owned by Heather Whyte. Assets are stated in Dec 2013 as #3231, with liabilities of #16678. The company check says: no telephone number available,… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  watchdog
19, August 2014 12:54 pm

The financials also look interesting. Take a look at http://companycheck.co.uk/company/07872992

kevin barclay-jay
19, August 2014 6:18 pm

yet another serious developer being scared off by Island NIMBYS…its already a derelict and run down site so harfly an AOB and locals…really…what locals,mits one of the most remote spots on the Island… The company has experience in building and running holiday camps is offfering to spend its money bringing a tourist attraction to an Island in need of investment and emplyment opportunities This applications only negative… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  kevin barclay-jay
19, August 2014 6:54 pm

Not that scared as they are going to appeal which might be risky given their alleged financial position?

ThomasC
Reply to  kevin barclay-jay
19, August 2014 6:57 pm

If you look into it (as I did before objecting) the issue is that they’re looking to have double the number of people on site who were ever at Atherfield Bay Holiday Centre. That creates more issues than light pollution. They’re also planning on building on far more area than the existing camp. Their accommodation would be put into an already crowded marketplace for self-catering. Wrong development… Read more »

scottydog
20, August 2014 12:00 am

and no doubt in 25 years when it’s all ready to fall into the sea due to coastal erosion they’ll be looking to the Council for a Handout from the “King Canute’s Fund” to try and keep it standing for another 5-10….

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined