Chief Constable Alex Marshall leaving Hampshire Constabulary

This in from Police, in their own words. Ed

The chief constable of Hampshire Constabulary, Alex Marshall, is to leave the force to take up a position as the chief executive of the new national College of Policing.

The announcement of Mr Marshall’s appointment was made today in the House of Commons by the Home Secretary Theresa May.

Mr Marshall will retain the rank of chief constable in the role.

Leaving in early 2013
The date for Mr Marshall’s departure from Hampshire Constabulary is not yet confirmed, but is likely to be early 2013.

The selection and appointment of a new chief constable will be made by the Police and Crime Commissioner, who will be selected in a public election in November.

Speaking of his appointment, Mr Marshall said:”This appointment is a fantastic opportunity to replace bureaucracy and unnecessary policies in policing with practical, common sense approaches based on the evidence of what works.

”By the time I leave, early in 2013, we will have seen five consecutive years of crime reduction in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Over this period, anti-social behaviour has gone down and we have caught more of the serious criminals.

“When I became chief constable in 2008, I promised to focus on the clear priorities of cutting crime and ensuring frontline visibility. Despite making huge cuts in the budget, we have protected and preserved our numbers in visible local roles.

“It will be a real wrench to leave Hampshire next year. This is a place where I feel very much at home, where I have been made to feel very welcome, and where I have worked with colleagues who are highly professional and genuinely care about the people they serve.”

“Difficult decision to even consider leaving Hampshire”
Adrian Collett, chair of Hampshire Police Authority, said: “This appointment is an exciting opportunity for Mr Marshall, but we know it will have been a difficult decision to even consider leaving Hampshire.

“He has made his mark locally, regionally and nationally and we have no doubt that he is an excellent choice for this role. Our feelings are mixed however because the college’s gain is certainly our loss. Mr Marshall is extremely well regarded by all in the constabulary and members of the Police Authority.

“His notable achievements include a significant and sustained reduction in crime. He has always been committed to protecting the frontline even in the times of austerity.

“He has ensured the force is ahead of the government’s comprehensive spending review -by taking difficult but important decisions whilst maintaining force performance.

“This appointment reflects well on us here in Hampshire. As his first chief constable appointment, Hampshire has provided him with the environment to grow into a nationally respected chief officer. Mr Marshall’s new role is a crucial one in the history of policing and one we are confident he will carry out to the very best of his abilities.

“Of course, this announcement comes shortly before the election for the Police and Crime Commissioner. Clearly the PCC will be involved in appointing Mr Marshall’s replacement.”

Over-seeing the training standards for all police
As chief executive of the College of Policing, Mr Marshall will be responsible for over-seeing the training standards for all police in the UK, as the service transforms to meet the changing demands of modern policing.

Alex Marshall joined Hampshire Constabulary on October 16, 2008, having previously served with the Metropolitan Police Service, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, and Thames Valley Police, where he was deputy chief constable.

During his four years with the constabulary, Mr Marshall has led the force in delivering a significant reduction in the total number of crimes committed in the two counties, from 89.6 per 1000 of the population to 68.6 per 1000 of the population last year. Analysis so far this year shows that that number is continuing to fall.

Campaigns such as Operation Nemesis, targeting domestic burglary, have seen the numbers of burglaries committed decrease from 15.2 per 1,000 households to 6.8.

Overseen many projects
During this time, Mr Marshall has overseen the successful roll-out of mobile data technology, equipping police officers to deliver more flexibly and effectively. As part of this, Hampshire has been lauded nationally as best practice in its pioneering use of mobile fingerprinting technology.

These achievements have been made against a backdrop of being required to make significant savings as part of the government’s Comprehensive Spending Review. To date, the force has made savings totalling £38.2million pounds, whilst maintaining frontline policing strength.

Mr Marshall is also the national ACPO lead for the National Police Air Service. He received the Queen’s Police Medal in the 2009 Birthday Honours list.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lee
16, March 2016 2:01 pm

Would Mr Berrisford be involved in the setting up or operation of any Tramline service if this was the preferred option of the DFT?

Del Boy
16, March 2016 2:09 pm

It’s almost as though he has some form of vested interest in the tram industry… “independent” my foot….

Del Boy
16, March 2016 2:20 pm

So, this would be the “Isle of Wight Tramway Co. Ltd” of which Berrisford is the director NOT an “independent light rail/tramway advisor”. The company is even registered to his home address. Berrisford is misleading the public and OTW. This is not news: it’s free marketing! He has a direct financial interest in publicising his little company which has, according to recent documents at Companies House, no… Read more »

Lee
16, March 2016 2:30 pm

The very same!

He also acknowledges that this report was compiled with the “kind assistance of Christopher Garnett”. I hate to be childish but……quelle surprise!

Adam
16, March 2016 2:45 pm

As he doesn’t appear to be independent after his acknowledgement, I think tramway campaigner is more appropriate than independent advisor. Nevertheless, some interesting points and it is very much a numbers game – which option will produce the best for the least in terms of set up and operating costs. Mr Brinton’s view to stay put with the existing stock is not good enough – the Island… Read more »

Lee
Reply to  Adam
16, March 2016 3:38 pm

Deserves better than the most reliable train in the country that costs the local population nothing to run, provides an affordable alternative to the buses, a convenient connection with the catamaran and employs nearly 50 people on a decent wage , much of which finds its way back into the local economy? As someone who talks to the visitors who use our train on a daily basis… Read more »

Adam
Reply to  Lee
17, March 2016 12:19 am

As per my comment, I was referring to the rolling stock not the service. Just because the line runs well doesn’t mean that there should be no change to it whatsoever. To clarify, I support the efforts to remain in the franchise, but I would very much like this to be with improvements to the line, namely the rolling stock. We should not just sit back and… Read more »

Chris
Reply to  Adam
17, March 2016 11:46 am

When suitable replacements become available they should be seriously considered, but trams would involve a very costly conversion, potentially push *up* costs relative to the existing non-standard operation, and risk the line being removed from the national network and the protection, through-ticketing etc that come with it.

John Farmer
Reply to  Adam
16, March 2016 3:43 pm

Brinton wasn’t suggesting that we keep the rolling stock indefinitely: merely that it could be maintained until the Bakerloo or Victoria assets become available. They would represent a better investment than the obsolete trams from Midland, which have a lower build-quality. In any event, it’s a moot point, as there is never going to be a major capital investment (circa £250m) from government needed for trams/lightrail. We’re… Read more »

Chris
16, March 2016 6:46 pm

What an infruriating response – he seems he has no actual technical knowledge, and has peddled nonsense for so long that he can’t admit that his fundamental arguments just don’t apply to this line. In particular the reference to track standards – poor by mainland standards but NOT dangerous, merely adequate. They would have to be raised for trams, *increasing* costs. I really hope he isn’t responsible… Read more »

ThomasC
17, March 2016 12:47 pm

Tarmac over the bl**y lot, run electric or hydrogen-powered buses only along the route, allow them to pass in the stations and put a dedicated cycleway alongside it.

I’ll bet it’ll net out cheaper and more sustainable than all these ideas that are being put forward by those who are locked to rails for some reason.

Richard
17, March 2016 6:06 pm

Thomas C

What if this line was planned to use a tunnel to go under the Solent to form your golden goose fixed link?
Would you be so anti-rail?
But the chances of this happening are about as great as your golden goose being built.

nico
9, November 2016 5:10 pm

Given the tram crash and fatalities in Croydon today, how many accidents have affected life and limb on Island Line, and is the transport thingy considering relative safety records of tram and rail?

VentnorLad
Reply to  nico
9, November 2016 5:54 pm

The death of 5 people in Croydon today is tragic. The friends and families of those people will never be the same again. It’s natural to question the safety of such transport solutions after such an incident. It’s hard to find comparative data that includes trams. I’m sure following this tragedy, it’ll find its way in to the public domain and consciousness. I don’t recall any other… Read more »

nico
Reply to  VentnorLad
10, November 2016 2:32 pm

Those statistics are horrific, Daveiow. If road traffic was to be newly introduced all of a sudden, surely we wouldn’t allow it. I’m hoping we will continue to have trains here rather than trams, and wonder if this current tram tragedy in Crydon will be another indication that we should stick with the former. No doubt an expert will tell us here, though perhaps once all the… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  nico
10, November 2016 3:25 pm

You’re right, we probably wouldn’t allow motorised transport if it was new and we were presented with those statistics. But neither would we eat the flesh of cows. We wouldn’t ferment grape juice and drink it. We wouldn’t roll tobacco leaves into tubes and set fire to them in order to inhale their smoke. But who would go through life without a steak dinner with a great… Read more »

nico
Reply to  nico
10, November 2016 4:45 pm

Are you kidding, daveiow?! First of all, I know we’re sensitive to possible lines of enjoyable disagreement here :) but I wasn’t suggesting doing away with roads and vehicles. I was stopping at the observation I made. ButI would *never* say what you subsequently seem to, that a type of meal and cigar made all those people’s deaths worth it!! If by forgoing favourite things of mine… Read more »

nico
Reply to  nico
10, November 2016 4:52 pm

Ok, I see now you weren’t talking about transporting stuff you like to consume :s

VentnorLad
Reply to  nico
10, November 2016 4:58 pm

Kidding? No.

I’m just taking your thought and running with it.

I find thought experiments a fascinating way to examine ideas.