College Students Launch Online Open Letter to Council Leader

Thanks to Chris for sharing details of the latest correspondence to the Isle of Wight council in relation to discretionary concessionary travel to faith schools. Ed

A group of students from Christ the King College have launched an online open letter to Council Leader, David Pugh, and all the Isle of Wight Councillors, objecting to plans to end discretionary concessionary travel to faith schools.

Already reached 80 signatures
The letter, already backed by 80 Island students and others, complains that the Council’s own online survey on the issue is “clearly rigged” arguing that “it gives three options for the withdrawal of free bus travel, but gives no option to vote for keeping the current arrangements. That is simply unjust and wrong.”

The letter organised by Melissa Carroll (aged 15 from Ryde) and Christ the King Senior House Captain Jonny Whitehouse (aged 15 from Totland) complains about what the signatories argue is “blatant discrimination against Christ the King students simply on the grounds of their Christian faith.”

Makes a mockery of Eco Island
Speaking yesterday, Jonny and Melissa say “the move would also make a mockery of the Council’s claim that we are an “Eco Island” because forcing so many students off the free buses would lead to an increase in car and motorcycle journeys and increase the risk of road traffic accidents”.

“We launched the open letter only 24 hours ago and then used email and Facebook to alert our friends” add Jonny and Melissa “and it has really taken off. We are staggered by how quickly the support is growing and really do hope that the Council will pay it attention and rethink their plans”.

Share your view
The online letter, which also features a photograph of Cllr Pugh, can be found on Petition Buzz.

Other Island students have posted strong views alongside their signatures on the open letter:

Noah Priddle a teenager from Freshwater posted:

“it is extremely hypocritical to promote the use of public transport and being “eco friendly” to then go and remove a service such as this; especially as a large portion of people would not use the bus service to travel to school because of how high the prices are and how unreliable the service is. It seems ridiculous that a service will be provided to Carisbrooke high but not to Christ the King which is only a stone’s throw away!

Matty Gough another Christ the King student posted:

“It’s ridiculous that we’re being discriminated against for being in a faith school!”

Jonathan Biss from Freshwater posted:

“I have one brother at Chris the King, and two younger ones who are hoping to join as well, how are we expected to pay that?”

Alex Snow from Shorwell posted:

“This discriminates and makes ‘eco-island’ look like a joke!”

Within only 24 hours of going live, the online letter had been viewed over 1,250 times suggesting that it is generating considerable interest across the Island.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
26 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sailor Sam
23, May 2011 2:03 pm

This has made me smile. All this hype about loosing free travel for a certain group of school children is gett ing a tad boring now. I note that one of the letter writers is from Ryde who presumebly gets free travel to CTK. To be honest, if she does then that annoys me because (as i’ve said on other ‘threads’ on this subject) my son also… Read more »

JW
23, May 2011 2:21 pm

I hope you have permission to use that photo of Mr Pugh from either himself or the attributed photographer. It’s been said many times before but I reiterate; pay just like any other pupils that live outside of their catchment area. It’s nothing to do with your race or religion, does it say somewhere within your religion that you must have free transport to your place of… Read more »

JW
Reply to  JW
23, May 2011 2:26 pm

Forgot to add, with names signing your petition such as “donkey”, “hello” and “hi” no wonder you have so many signatures. ;)

Senior Service
Reply to  JW
23, May 2011 7:24 pm

Just had a look at the petition page, those names that you mention do not exist. Stop making things up to “help” your argument!

JW
Reply to  Senior Service
24, May 2011 10:32 am

Lucky that PetitionBuzz allows you to delete signatures then, isn’t it? ;)

Senior Service
Reply to  JW
24, May 2011 10:43 am

Apparantly

Senior Service
Reply to  JW
23, May 2011 7:19 pm

Right or wrong, their decision to go to CTK would have been influenced by bus travel being available. Now they are there the council knows full well that parents will try to get their children to school despite the costs. Our children have a catchment school of Carisbrooke (From West Wight) they go to CTK. They cost YOU less in council tax than if they went to… Read more »

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Senior Service
23, May 2011 8:52 pm

There is obviously need to provide free school transport for West Wight high school children irrespective of which school they attend but can you explain the need to provide free travel for children living in towns like Ryde who choose to attend CTK please?

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Sailor Sam
23, May 2011 8:53 pm

Sorry, ‘the need’ isn’t quite what I meant. I think the RIGHT is a more appropiate question.

Senior Service
Reply to  Sailor Sam
23, May 2011 9:14 pm

Well perhaps there should be a compromise. My proposal is as follows: 1: if the distance to your catchment school is the same or further than the distance to CTK then the council should pay the bus fare. This is aimed primarily at those children in West Wight (Carisbrooke) and South Wight (Medina). 2. If you go “past” your catchment school on the way to CTK then… Read more »

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Senior Service
23, May 2011 9:37 pm

You are getting close to solving my problem. but I (and no doubt many other parents) was unaware that ALL CTK children got free travel untill this topic appeared. I have been paying for my son’s bus travel to his chosen school since 2007 where it appears that some CTK children have been getting free travel dispite living nearer to an alternative school. Is that fair? I… Read more »

countrygirl
23, May 2011 3:13 pm

Perhaps muslims and catholics and sheiks etc should be going to ryde, sandown etc, and all children could have morning assemblies, and have morning worship, if the children should choose to attend of course. Might do them some good :) a lesson in diverse religions! I’m sure there would not be any objections!

fairystuff
23, May 2011 3:28 pm

To solve the problem why not make EVERYONE pay! All school children should pay whether its their local school or not. Then there would be no arguments on what is fair and what is not.

Miffed
23, May 2011 8:59 pm

Would King Herod please make his way to the stage to debate this issue with Allah.

For Christ's sake
24, May 2011 7:20 am

It is simple. We either all pay or we all go free. The only grounds valid for help with bus fees are those with financial difficulties. You could use free school meals as a guide. Oh by the way check out CTK special educational needs quota. Very small and disproportionate for the number of children attending. Presumably God doesn’t afflict his own? Pay up and shut up… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  For Christ's sake
24, May 2011 8:22 am

Any parent who choses to send their child to school other than their local school based on religion should be prepared to pay to do so

Senior Service
Reply to  For Christ's sake
24, May 2011 9:14 am

OK I’m prepared to pay IF the council and YOU as a council tax payer are prepared to put the same amount of money per child into CTK as is paid into Medina / Carisbrooke etc. Again YOU are getting this education on the cheap, it is unfair on those already at CTK to now have to pay. Don’t change the rules in the middle of a… Read more »

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Senior Service
24, May 2011 9:40 am

Err, we are not talking about education here, we are talking about conessionary travel so what has ‘getting education on the cheap’ got do do with anything? My son lives ‘next to’ the catchment area for Sandown, but he is atill outside of it so he has to pay and has been doing so for 4 years on both bus and train (the latter being cheaper and… Read more »

Senior Service
Reply to  Sailor Sam
24, May 2011 10:54 am

Err, the council want to cut costs, so I am looking at it in financial terms. Overall I save you money (Err, I assume you are a council tax payer?). So if you and the council want to axe free transport to CTK then I would like to have the same amount of money spent on my children as other schools get from the council. It will… Read more »

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Senior Service
24, May 2011 11:14 am

You still don’t get it do you? I am not saying that free travel should be cut for CTK and I am not saying that they should pay either. What I am saying that ALL yes, ALL children should be treated the same. Meaning that if I have to pay for my son’s transport to school then so should you irrespective of which faith, colour or creed… Read more »

Senior Service
Reply to  Senior Service
24, May 2011 12:53 pm

And you don’t get it either! Re read my proposal above. You made a choice to send your child out of catchment area. You knew that you would have to pay for transport to and from. We made a choice to send our child to a school still in catchment area but not the designated catchment school that is a few hundred yards up the road. We… Read more »

fairystuff
24, May 2011 7:35 am

I think EVERYONE should pay!! Otherwise its discriminating against the rich?? The poor should have to pay as well. Its only fair. All these arguments over discrimination and everyone is still discriminating against someone!

wabbit
24, May 2011 8:43 am

All the moans and groans about bus fares,what is going happen when the university tuition fee lands on the doormat.

Vix
24, May 2011 9:44 am

Surely the solution is to just make CTK a normal comp which everyone has the right to attend? I agree – I cannot see why parents who choose a church school get free transport, but parents who choose a school based on more rational beliefs such as exam results or performing arts opportunities have to pay. Madness. Make CTK a secular school, or let the church pay… Read more »

Senior Service
Reply to  Vix
24, May 2011 10:57 am

If you want to make it a secular school, so be it, but pay up come council tax time for the extra funding per pupil required, the bus fares etc. Or lose extra services.

Student Storage
25, May 2011 8:47 am

It depends on the requirements and surroundings situations of family to acquire the transportation to school for their children.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined