Council will be ‘sympathetic to service personnel’ says Cllr Mazillius

Readers will remember the article VB ran yesterday, reporting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request featured on the Conservative Home Website highlighting how councils around the country approach social housing allocation.

Roger Mazillius:We had not received a response from the council at the time of publishing, but after-hours night a comprehensive statement from Cllr Mazillius dropped into our inbox.

The council had responded to the FOIA request stating that they do not give greater preference to those having served in the Armed Forces, over those with housing need also on the register.

Response was based on current policies
Cllr Roger Mazillius, IW Council cabinet member for adult social care, community services and housing told VB, “Our responses to the consultation were based on the current policies but we will, naturally seek to make use of the greater flexibilities of the Localism Act following the required consultation, as appropriate.”

He added that “The quotes featured in this article are selective and unfortunately have ignored some important context.”

We can only assume that Cllr Mazillius is referring to the quotes in the Conservative Home article, as VB does not have access to the council’s response to the FOIA request.

May now be changing
Cllr Mazillius goes on to say, “In the case of the armed forces question, we have told Government that while we do not currently offer greater preference to those who have served in the armed forces we would be sympathetic to those applications from service personnel – and their families – with an urgent housing need.

“Recently, for example, a military family with an urgent housing need and a strong family connection to the Island was successfully housed here.”

Injured servicemen/women
It will be encouraging for many to hear that those who have been injured during service, could, in the future, be given additional preference.

Cllr Mazillius continued, “In light of the new government guidance, we will be seeking to implement and give additional preference to those personnel that have a need to move because of a serious injury, medical condition or disability sustained as a result of their service.”

Seasonal workers
As everyone is aware, there is a great deal of seasonal work on the Island. Cllr Mazillius said, “Our response to the question of rewarding people who are in work was made in the context of the large number of Islanders employed in seasonal work. It would be unfair on these hard working people if they were disadvantaged in terms of their housing need due to the seasonal nature of their work.

“A housing policy that also reflected this seasonal employment issue would also be extremely hard to administer as their employment situation and therefore people’s individual circumstances could vary so markedly on an almost monthly basis that updating their details on the Choiced Based Lettings scheme would be unrealistic.

“It should go without saying that the council would give no advantage to people who make no effort to work over those that do but who have their ability for full-time employment curtailed by the Island’s dependency on seasonal work.”

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
keithybaby
3, February 2011 3:24 pm

Is there not a cost to the council, or rather us, in laying people off? Or are Southern Vectis taking on the current TIC staff?

Eco-Warrior
3, February 2011 3:33 pm

‘We can find innovative solutions’ says George Brown. Sounds like SV found the solution to me? All those the council planned to sack, will still get the sack. I’ll wager no-one will be able to buy tickets for anything, including events as previously, except for bus tickets of course :) This new ‘service’ sounds about as useful as asking a passer-by for help. Well done George. Well… Read more »

Catfink
3, February 2011 3:55 pm

Hmmmn, call me cynical but did the council know about this before the ‘shock decision / no alternative’ to close the TIC’s….

Steve & Jane
Reply to  Catfink
3, February 2011 4:41 pm

We understand that the council gives some of our money to the bus company; anybody out there able to say how much? Or how much profit they take from here? If, as we suspect, the latter exceeds the former, perhaps we are due a refund… In the interests of Councillor Brown’s innovation & excitement, how about redeploying the soon to be dumped T.I. staff as conductor/guides on… Read more »

wightgeek
Reply to  Steve & Jane
3, February 2011 7:19 pm

Southern Vectis get around £8 million a year from the Council Tax payers. Here’s their payments for the first 6 months of this financial year: http://armchairauditor.onthewight.com/suppliers/go-south-coast-ltd Most of that is for concessionary fares for over 60’s, which don’t forget is calculated using their standard fare charges – which is probably one of the highest in the UK per mile. For example, a one stop ride up a… Read more »

hmmm
3, February 2011 4:18 pm

its fair enough. people have been saying move TICs into libraries or theatres. To be honest, this makes much more sense. The information will be available at the place you have to go to catch a bus to get there. It makes perfect sense. But of course people wont like it because they see southern vectis as increasing their monopoly.

Bus Driver
Reply to  hmmm
3, February 2011 4:31 pm

Nothing new here. SV had travel shops previously untill a decission was taken to close them with the exception of Newport. Obviously SV see this as an opportunity to promote it’s services to visitors at minimal cost.

hmmm
Reply to  Bus Driver
3, February 2011 4:37 pm

promoting SV services is fine, so long as they also promote the same venues and events that TIC offices do now. I also hope that southern vectis is able to employ the current TIC staff, who clearly know their jobs extremely well and would be an asset to the new system. Obviously the council should be tightly regulating this to ensure that SV sticks to their side… Read more »

LadyWight
Reply to  Bus Driver
4, February 2011 10:08 pm

i agree

Monty Karlo
3, February 2011 4:24 pm

How dare they! TIC staff have suggested numerous innovative ways of revamping the service over the years and nothing has been done. Now, behind our backs, a deal has been done and those of us not working today have heard the news via VB – well done once again IOW Council on your staff communication. Simplify the service by all means but for SV to say that… Read more »

no.5
Reply to  Monty Karlo
3, February 2011 4:54 pm

well said..I can’t beleive people are seeing this as compensation or a replacement for TIC’s. This is a commercial move by a company that sees a gap in the markey created by a tory council following tory ideology.

When this SV Information Offices close down it will be because of commercial non-viability as before and nobody will have a say

Dave Q
Reply to  Monty Karlo
4, February 2011 8:01 am

How do you expect an immigrant Welshman to know where the entry point to the Island is? He knows the way to his bank, and he can find his backside (but only because its attached)

Reg Gierson
3, February 2011 4:24 pm

To be overheard at a bus stop near you in the future:
“Well, madam, lots of places to visit on the island – how about taking the kids to XXX? Er, no, you’ll have to drive – there’s no bus there anymore, we’ve just withdrawn our service.”

D
3, February 2011 4:40 pm

Oh Great, a walking Tourist Information Centre.

Anonymous
3, February 2011 5:43 pm

Hopefully there will be more than one firm that takes advantage of the TIC closures, the Council should not be patted on the back for putting so much backing behind one monopolist.

no.5
Reply to  Anonymous
4, February 2011 12:24 am

I heard Chamber of Commerce might take some over

Martin William Wareham
3, February 2011 6:05 pm

Sounds like a second class Tourist service from a not to good bus company .I hope the visitor information assistants attendants around the Island is considerably better than operations director Mark Morgan Hughes was when he was a Island councillor.George Brown said at no cost to the Council George get real.

Simon J
3, February 2011 10:27 pm

I find it’s generally easier to provide information from in an office containing a computer, reference books, leaflets and posters than just standing around in the high street, but maybe that’s just me.

Bob Smith
Reply to  Simon J
3, February 2011 10:31 pm

Newport will be in the bus station enquiry office.
Ryde will be in the old information office.
Yarmouth will presumably be in the bus station hut.

All of which are offices which can contain a computer, reference books and leaflets.

That leaves just Cowes and Sandown.

Let’s face it though, it’s better than nothing.

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Bob Smith
4, February 2011 1:13 am

I wonder what the Ryde SV ‘information’ staff will advise when a tourist asks; ‘which is the best mode of transport to get to Shanklin?’ Who reckons the answer they give will be the train, because it’s cheaper and quicker then by bus?

Not necessary
Reply to  Sailor Sam
4, February 2011 10:00 pm

For a visitor, the best mode of transport would probably be by bus. A 7 day rover would enable them to travel the entire island in addition to using the Sandown Bay Tour and road train replacement service. Additionally the frequencies will be higher from April and would offer more flexible options for dropping the passenger off near their hotel or chosen accomodation, especially with heavy bags… Read more »

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Not necessary
5, February 2011 12:29 am

Yes but what if they DON’T want to buy a rover ticket? Will the information staff even tell the visitor about the train option and the fact that you can get return tickets? An SV comment if ever I saw one!

shirlee
3, February 2011 11:54 pm

Well here in West Wight we do NOT require a tourist info office from Southern Vectis because we are now left with a very limited bus schedule to travel anywhere on the island let alone return back. Maybe the next day return if we should want to enjoy a full day out with our visiting guests.They have reduced our bus service by so much we have trouble… Read more »

Dave Q
4, February 2011 7:56 am

Sounds to me like the Council have found a way to get rid of TICs, I wonder how they’ll compensate Southern Vectis- remember an ex County Councillor is SVs Operations Director??

Sailor Sam
Reply to  Dave Q
4, February 2011 8:26 am

Does anyone know how he became to be an ex-county councillor?

Debby Robinson
4, February 2011 8:39 am

And Ventnor is left out yet again. Mmmmmm….that humungous ‘vent’ on Ocean View Road is right by the bus stop. The plan must be to send someone along on a double decker with an enormous blunt screwdriver. All they’ll have to do is put the screwdriver in the hole, prize Ventnor off the bottom of the island and in a few days we’ll be France’s problem. The… Read more »

unionman
4, February 2011 7:54 pm

Island thinking is do not rely on SV

LadyWight
4, February 2011 10:04 pm

Cllr Browns comments ” it is an exciting and novel approach.”

If he had bothered to look at Tourism TIC history on the Island he would have remembered that years and years ago SV did run them before!!!!

So id say its an old idea not a exciting and novel approach!! More like tourism on the island going backwards not forward!!!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined