Gavel and water glasses:

Driver of double fatality car crash sentenced

Our thoughts are with all today, after the driver of the car that caused the death of Kiri-Jade Hodgkinson and Barbara Ford is sentenced. This in from the police, in their own words. Ed


At around 3.12pm on Thursday, January 2, 2014, a fatal road traffic collision occurred on the Mersley Down Road, Isle of Wight.

This case was investigated by Hampshire Constabulary’s Road Death Investigation Team. The collision involved two vehicles: a red Renault Clio containing three people and a silver Renault Megane convertible containing two people.

The Renault Megane was travelling east on Mersley Down Road when it was in a collision with the Renault Clio travelling west, between Knighton Shute and Rowlands Lane.

Clio lost control
Investigators believe the Clio lost control on a right hand bend shortly before the collision and then crossed onto the oncoming carriageway where it was struck by the oncoming Megane. The front of the Megane collided with the nearside of the Clio causing substantial damage to the Clio.

The front seat passenger of the Clio, a 14-year-old girl Kiri Jade Hodgkinson , was pronounced dead at the scene. The 18-year-old driver of the Clio, Jack Powell, from Sandown, was airlifted to Southampton General Hospital with life threatening injuries, from which he has since recovered.

The rear seat passenger, a 13-year-old girl, was also airlifted to Southampton General Hospital with serious injuries. She received two broken legs and a broken ankle, and is still recuperating from her injuries.

The other car
The car driver of the Megane, 67-year-old Douglas Ford, from Brading, received minor injuries and was treated at St Mary’s Hospital, Newport, before being released.

His wife, Barbara Ford, also 67, was the front seat passenger. She sustained serious injuries and died in the early hours of Friday, January 3, 2014.

Little or no time to react
The investigation found that it was extremely unlikely Mr Ford would have been able to have avoided the collision with the Clio, because it suddenly appeared in front of him and in his pathway, giving him little or no opportunity to react or take avoiding action.

Jack Powell was charged with two counts of causing death by careless driving. He appeared at Newport Magistrates Court on Friday, June 13, and pleaded guilty to both offences.

Magistrate issued sentence
Today (Friday, July 4) he was sentenced to a 12 month Community Order with 250 hours unpaid work. He was also given a nine month curfew and a five year disqualification from driving, with an order to have an extended retest before being allowed a return to driving.

Sergeant Rob Heard, deputy senior investigating officer for Operation Mohite, said:

“This is a tragic case which has brought about the untimely and sudden loss of two people and serious injuries to three others.

“Jack Powell had passed his driving test just two weeks before this collision, and this case highlights the dangers that young and new drivers face when first taking to the roads independently.

“Young drivers need to be aware that just because they have passed a driving test does not mean that they are fully experienced drivers. Experience is gained every time we take to the road and never stops, we are all learning and developing our driving skills every day we drive on our roads.

“There are many courses available to help new drivers to develop their skills and I would urge young drivers to undertake additional training after passing their tests whenever possible.

“Our thoughts and best wishes go out to the families and friends of all concerned, as this tragic incident has affected many people.”

Image: komunews under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
14 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
barbaragreen
5, July 2014 1:21 pm

why was he not sent to prison he had killed two people
This justise system is all wrong.

Caconym
Reply to  barbaragreen
6, July 2014 2:25 pm

I think the sentence was correct. He was convicted of causing death by careless driving (NOT dangerous) and this was, as Sgt Heard stated, due to his inexperience. Banging him up with hardened criminals would serve no purpose except, possibly, to turn him into one himself. Hands on heart. Who can, honestly, say that they haven’t done something stupid on the road on occasion and “got away… Read more »

Mark Francis
6, July 2014 3:48 am

Judges don’t use gavels – only auctioneers. Blimey I’m getting pedantic tonight.

Sorry.

Andrew Smith
6, July 2014 2:13 pm

So he was speeding, drifted into the right hand lane and hit a car killing two people and only given a non custodial sentence and a small 250 hour community order? So in 6 years time this would all be a distant memory for the yob, what about the people he killed and their families in 60 years? In the states he would have got at least… Read more »

retired Hack
Reply to  Andrew Smith
6, July 2014 3:36 pm

It did go to a crown court – for sentence – after he pleaded guilty before magistrates earlier.

Caconym
Reply to  Andrew Smith
6, July 2014 5:44 pm

“So he was speeding”
Really? Where was this reported?

“drifted into the right hand lane”
Again Where was this reported?

“yob”?
Do you know this lad? You must do to categorise him as a “yob”. Please back up your label with some evidence.

In the States you would now have a nice fat letter from the lad’s attorney plopping onto your doormat.

tryme
Reply to  Caconym
6, July 2014 6:47 pm

Glad you brought these facts and this perspective to the matter, Suruk.

Robert Jones
Reply to  Caconym
6, July 2014 9:44 pm

Well done for saying this: it needed saying; some are all too quick to condemn, too slow to understand, and will never sympathize or even comprehend that a consequence of momentary foolishness, or just lack of experience, can lead to tragic consequences. My deepest sympathies go to ALL involved in this case, which has ended two lives and ruined others: it’s so easy, and so lazy, and… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Andrew Smith
6, July 2014 6:57 pm

On the other hand, Andrew, this may be something that haunts him all his life – perhaps the older he bcomes as he grows into a man, the worse it will get for him. I suppose one has to remember that he didn’t set out to kill anyone, which makes sentencing a different matter than for murder. I wonder why there isn’t some statutory restriction on newly-passed… Read more »

Robert Jones
Reply to  tryme
6, July 2014 9:54 pm

Nothing can substitute for experience, can it? You can have tests upon tests, but ultimately we are driven back on our own personal judgement; sometimes that will be wrong, sometimes tragically wrong. Perhaps the car accident which broke my back and left me with a lifetime of pain could be blamed on my brother (and I would never post this if I thought he would ever see… Read more »

tryme
6, July 2014 10:32 pm

Sorry to read of your experience, Robert.

Perhaps newly passed drivers shouldn’t be able to carry more than 1 passenger at a time in their first 6 months, and that person to be over 18yrs. This could reduce risks from distraction and a naiive driver being
egged-on/showing off.

Mark Francis
Reply to  tryme
7, July 2014 8:25 am

When I was at school many people started driving at the age of 17. Most teenagers pass their test first time (my wife took 7 attempts in her 30s)yet by the time they were 18 most had had serious accidents – although thankfully none killed. The Hare & Hounds closed at 1030 & the Wishing Well had a late licence. This resulted in a dash between the… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Mark Francis
7, July 2014 9:34 am

In certain states of the US (e.g. North Dakota) drivers can get a learner’s permit at 14, and a full licence at 16. Even in California, which has more restrictive rules, a learner permit can be obtained at 15 1/2 and a full licence at 17. However (in California, at least) there are restrictions on newly qualified drivers in that, for the first year after passing their… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined