Ed Vaizey Reminds IWC Of Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964

The proposed closure of nine of the eleven libraries on the Isle of Wight has raised much interest, from residents as well as the national media.

Several VB readers have been in touch, sharing letters they’ve written to the Secretary of State, Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP and the responses received.

One such response, referred to a letter sent recently by the Minister for Culture, Ed Vaizey MP, to all local authorities. In his letter, Mr Vaizey reminds local authorities of their responsibility under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964 to provide a ‘comprehensive and efficient’ library service.

Letter outlines considerations councils must take
We’ve now got hold of a copy of that letter (thanks to Mike) and can share it with you (see below).

Mr Vaizey highlights key findings from the report of a 2009 inquiry into proposed closures of 11 of 24 libraries by Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council.

The outcome is that the following four key considerations need to be taken into account when planning any library closures.

  • a statement of what the service is trying to achieve;
  • a description of local needs, including the general and specific needs of adults and children who live, work and study in the area;
  • a detailed description of how the service will be delivered and how the plans will fully take into account the demography of the area and the different needs of adults and children in different areas (both in general and specific terms);
  • the resources available for the service, including an annual budget.

We’ll be contacting the IWC to see whether they feel they’ve met the criteria outlined above, as part of their proposals.

We’d suggest clicking on the ‘Full Screen’ link below for a clearer version of the letter.

Ed Vaizey to Local Authority Leaders 10 Dec

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colin
28, November 2013 6:02 pm

BT have recently spent hundreds of millions on getting rights to football games; money that should have been used to fund their infrastructure.

The council must be totally bonkers.

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Colin
29, November 2013 5:31 pm

BT could afford to spend £897m (more than doubling the cost of the contract) to outbid Sky for footy games, because our gov’t. is giving them £1.2bn of our money to deliver broadband to rural areas. (Private Eye again; bonkers not to read it!)

Sussex Man
28, November 2013 6:09 pm

Are we all holding our breath> Do we actually EXPECT someone to tell us what is happening?

Can anyone clarify the individual nuances of e), f) and h)? I find those 3 rather confusing! I hope the IoWC understands them.

ThomasC
28, November 2013 6:17 pm

All of the conditions are immaterial. BT will do whatever they were going to, on their own timelines, however delayed they may be. If the IW Council comes after them what will happen is BT Legal Dept will tie the much smaller IW Council Legal Dept up in knots and say something about ‘best efforts’ as the creaking, decaying archaic copper network fails to deliver the NGA… Read more »

Cynic
28, November 2013 7:32 pm

“(d) 100% of premises to receive a minimum of 2mpbs” Download is already better that that in most places: marginal increase in Upload. “(e) 97% of premises in the intervention area to have an NGA connection (min 30 mbps) POST project” ” f)87% of premises in the intervention area to have immediate access to superfast broadband speeds (min 24 mbps) POST project “(h) 96% of premises on… Read more »

Sussex Man
28, November 2013 7:50 pm

Cicero – d) was an essential part of the ‘deal’ as it is the government’s ‘promise’ to the UK and thus could not be ignored in politics. POST project requires a clear termination date for the contract (is that the same as the project? – cue BT’s legal team). I was hoping someone could cut through the crap and sort out what:- “97% min 30mb” “87% min… Read more »

ThomasC
2, December 2013 4:32 pm

In a relatively timely fashion, and as a reminder of BT’s commitment to delivering on their timescales and promises our FTTC date has been slipped another month. They put a date up, until we’re a day past it, then it’s slipped by a month, two months, six months, who knows how long? For the past few months we’ve been promised FTTC would be order-able on 30th November.… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined