Has paying for parking by phone resulted in a fine for you?

pay-by-phone-

The facility to pay for parking in Isle of Wight council car parks and on-street bays was introduced back in beginning of 2012.

Keen to try out new technologies, we registered fairly soon after the introduction and have used the service a couple of times since. It has been a convenient way to pay for parking when there’s no change in the purse and the fact you can extend the parking by simply sending a text if you are taking longer than expected, is pretty neat.

Penalty notice issued after using pay-by-phone
However, one reader who got in touch with us this week telling us that she recently received a penalty notice after parking in a council car park and using the pay-by-phone service.

She says the fine was for ‘not displaying a valid ticket’.

If you’ve used this service, you’ll know that you’re not given a ticket to display in your car. Your car registration and how much you’ve paid is sent to the Blackberries of the traffic wardens instead.

What’s been your experience?
Luckily, our reader appealed against the Penalty Notice and the fine was cancelled.

Our experience of using the pay-by-phone service has been seamless and without problems, but we wondered whether others had experienced the same as our reader.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
12 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bystander
25, September 2013 6:22 pm

Perhaps Beynon could do a bit of bricklaying, doubt if he’s qualified but that wouldn’t necessarily be seen as a disadvantage by the Council.

Stephen
25, September 2013 7:34 pm

And the cost of any outstanding ‘snagging’ etc [defect remedying] not fulfilled by the original contractor?

tiki
25, September 2013 8:18 pm

Bob the Builder

JohnR
25, September 2013 8:39 pm

I do not know how true it is but rumour has it that Pihl have already been paid for the demolition / landscaping etc of the old building.

If this is correct presumably the council, sorry, ‘we’ will have to pay again.

jonno45
25, September 2013 10:16 pm

Stuart Love rolls out yet another management speak phrase “mission critical”!!! Sounds like we are heading for Space! Has anyone managed to check out Stuart’s CV and his momentous rise from office boy at Westminster City Council to deputy Chief Exec here! Yet another Duckworth and Beynon… [part of comment removed by moderator]

Jake_Gully
Reply to  jonno45
26, September 2013 9:45 am

Perhaps with Pihl now out of the picture, the IW Council can come clean and not hide behind the convenience of commercial sensitivities. It’s time we were told: 1. Where the original budget of £ 32m stands and how much remains uncommitted and available to complete the project. 2. What is the projected budget for the completion of remaining deficiences within the new building and the demolition/re-instatement… Read more »

mat
Reply to  Jake_Gully
26, September 2013 11:33 am

Its about time, with the budget being considered, that the process of removing these two Tory execs. was looked at. In my view they are still interfering too much, with old projects in particular carried forward, and the council needs to look at officers’ salaries. I would think that any of the departments could elect a decent overall manager on a reasonable salary. Or, one of our… Read more »

Billy Builder
26, September 2013 10:49 am

I don’t think that some officers in the Council would particularly welcome an inquiry into this matter, as any inquiry would find that the building should have, could have and would have been delivered back in November/December last year if they had not interfered in things they did not understand. If the building had have been delivered in November/December last year, then Pihl would have completed the… Read more »