Investigation Into Road Traffic Collision On Medina Way

Following the car accident yesterday on the Medina Way the Police send through an update. Ed

Medina WayOfficers were called to the dual carriageway at 3.29pm on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 to a report of a collision involving a BMW and a Morris Minor.

The collision affected the northbound and southbound carriageways of Medina Way. Road closures and diversions were in place on Medina Way until shortly before 8.40pm on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 so a detailed investigation of the collision scene could be completed.

Driver not injured
Five people were taken to hospital after the collision.

The BMW driver, a 25-year-old man from Cowes, Isle of Wight, was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving. He was taken to Newport Police Station for questioning, and later bailed until March 26, 2011 pending further enquiries. It is believed he was not injured in the collision.

A Hampshire Constabulary spokesman said: “Some of the injuries were initially classed as potentially life threatening at the collision scene, but after several hours it became apparent that none of the injured motorists or passengers were at risk of dying.

“This was a serious collision that meant one of the island’s main roads had to be closed completely for several hours. This caused considerable disruption to traffic in Newport and other parts of the island. Police would like to thank the public for their understanding and patience while emergency services helped the casualties and carried out enquiries at the scene.

“We’re also grateful to all those people who’ve provided information to the police so far. Officers remain keen to hear from anyone else who saw the collision or the BMW and Morris Minor in the moments beforehand at approximately 3.20pm on Tuesday.”

Get in touch
Anyone with information is asked to contact PC Geoff Turner of the Isle of Wight Roads Policing Unit (RPU) at Shanklin Police Station by phoning 101 or emailing.

From outside Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, call police on 0845 045 45 45.

Mini-Com users can call the police on 01962 875000.

Information can be given anonymously by calling the Crimestoppers charity on 0800 555 111.

Image: © Google Streetview

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
16 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mo
26, January 2011 2:34 pm

I’m sorry, but the northbound side was unaffected, the acident was on the southbound sliproad. As usual, the police over-react and close the whole road, causing chaos for hours. An hour or more after the crash, I saw an ambulance racing to St Marys stop at Coppins Bridge. It was prevented from using the northbound dual carriageway. I only hope the diversion and delay didn’t cause loss… Read more »

Grievy
Reply to  Mo
26, January 2011 2:39 pm

You know a lot about accident investigation then I assume? Obviously you’re an expert on it as you know better than the police.

Kelvin Currie
Reply to  Grievy
26, January 2011 2:47 pm

As I understand it, the BMW left the northbound carriageway and crossed into the southbound one with the above result. I can only assume that accident investigators needed to gather any evidence as to why that may have happened. If they are going to prosecute the BMW driver, they needed to make sure there wasn’t a fault with the road surface, and look at any skid marks… Read more »

Didge
Reply to  Mo
26, January 2011 2:49 pm

As the BMW came from the Northbound side into the Southbound, the police would have needed to collect all evidence to help understand what had happened.
Also, as rescue attempts were underway, the last thing the rescuees want is being rubbernecked by all and sundry and these nosy people could well have caused another accident.

Jonnyhotrod
Reply to  Didge
26, January 2011 3:03 pm

Rubbernecking is human nature. Don’t try for a second to deny that you wouldn’t look. Unless you are actually a robot.

Sailor Sam
26, January 2011 3:58 pm

Apparently the BMW driver has been arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving.

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  Sailor Sam
26, January 2011 4:05 pm

Yep, that’s what it says in the article above.

Jonnyhotrod
Reply to  Sally Perry
26, January 2011 4:49 pm

Apparently, there was a crash on the dual carriageway yesterday.

Mr J
26, January 2011 6:23 pm

In fairness to Mo, anyone looking at the accident from a distance, may not have known the North side was affected in any way. The damaged cars were on the other side. It does seem a little ott not to allow an ambulance to pass if it was on an emergency call.

C McL
26, January 2011 9:10 pm

Following a RTI (incident, not accident anymore) where people have life threatening injuries the police have to carry out a full investigation as it could be a potential murder scene. Only trained officers can do this and they might not have been available on the island at the time.

Cannot quote 100% on above but it is my understanding

Sailor Sam
Reply to  C McL
26, January 2011 10:06 pm

Murder? Don’t think there are many RTC’s (it’s collisions actually, not incidents) which result in murder enquiries. They may treat it as a fatality though if there are life threatening injuries which as far as i’m aware there wasn’t.

hmmm
Reply to  Sailor Sam
26, January 2011 10:24 pm

nope, it is now incidents, as an incident may not involve another car, it might be a car flipping onto its roof or something like that. They changed it from accident as an accident implies there is no-one to blame. Of course its all bollocks, and no-one who got taken up the hospital could care less what you call it, or how inconvenienced anyone was, but only… Read more »

Sailor Sam
Reply to  hmmm
27, January 2011 1:41 am

You are correct in saying why the police no longer refer to these ‘incidents’ as RTA’a (road traffic accidents) but they do now use the term RTC’s replacing ‘accident’ with ‘collision’ as 99% of accidents are in fact caused by either negligence, incompitence or wrecklessnes.

hmmm
Reply to  Sailor Sam
27, January 2011 5:08 pm

well we shall have to agree to differ. Incidents is used to refer to any incident on the road involving traffic.

C McL
Reply to  C McL
27, January 2011 8:26 am

It is good to hear that it turns out the passengers involved didn’t have serious/life threatening injuiries, but at the time the police weren’t to know this and have to following government guildelines for situations like this. Personally, I don’t care if they call it accident, incedent, collision but the fact is some some labour Quango probably spent fortunes on consultants to decide what we should call… Read more »

Mrs S
26, January 2011 10:16 pm

Slightly amazed that the gist of most comments above is either ‘how inconvenient it was for me’ or ‘how much we know about accidents (or any acronym for an accident)’ Hopefully all those involved are ok- pretty sure none of them were too worried about the actual term for what happened.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined