IW Council Disappointed At Final Grant Settlement

This came in from Conservative councillor and leader of the Isle of Wight council, David Pugh late last night. Ed

The Leader of the Isle of Wight Council has responded to the announcement of the final grant settlement for local authorities, which sees the Isle of Wight’s funding provision for next year improved by only £4,470.

David Pugh - iWightThis is despite a submission to the Government which set out the case for an adjustment of £898,000, due to miscalculations in grants for concessionary fares and local transport. This representation included a meeting with the Local Government Minister Bob Neill MP, prior to Christmas.

“Not followed their own guidance”
Speaking after the details of the final grant settlement were announced in a written ministerial statement, Cllr David Pugh said: “The Government has calculated our grant settlement for 2011/12 using incorrect figures. It is very clear that they have not followed their own guidance for how like-for-like comparisons between financial years should take place. We will now be considering what further steps are taken in pursuit of our rightful entitlement of funding.

“It appears that many other local authorities have also had their justifiable claims for funding adjustments largely ignored.

Meeting with Andrew Turner
“This matter is due to be debated and voted on by MPs on Wednesday 9th February. We intend to meet with Andrew Turner before then and will be asking him to speak in that debate on behalf of the Isle of Wight.”

Cllr Pugh has once again highlighted the Council’s concern at the frontloading nature of the reductions. Calculations by the local authority show that if the Government spread the reductions evenly over a four year period, rather than the bulk being placed into 2011/12, then the Council’s savings target for next year would be reduced from £17.8m to £11.6m.

Concern at frontloading
Responding to this figure, Cllr Pugh added: “We have repeatedly expressed concern about the frontloading of the cuts in the next financial year. The Local Government Association has made representations about this concern, on our behalf, to central government – but to no avail.

“The size of the service reductions we are having to consider for next year are as a direct result of this frontloading. We strongly urge MPs to reconsider the scale and speed of the reductions in funding to local government, and we will also be asking Andrew to take this up on our behalf in next week’s debate.

Opportunity for a more equitable approach
“There is still the opportunity for MPs to agree a more equitable approach to local government’s contribution to deficit reduction. I am sure that councils right across the country will, over the next week, be encouraging their parliamentary representatives to do this.”

Image: iWight

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
20 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
no.5
2, February 2011 9:53 am

someones senses their jobs on the line

Rush
Reply to  no.5
2, February 2011 10:14 am

Someone senses their future is on the line.

allan marsh
2, February 2011 9:56 am

Law of Logical Argument – Anything is possible if you don’t know what you are talking about.

RTUC
Reply to  allan marsh
2, February 2011 11:34 am

What is becoming clear is that all authorities are drawing a line of demarcation between themselves and the government.The deficit, that was not of the people’s making, is being foisted onto their backs by the Con/Dem government.The point is that we are not “all in this together” when it comes to paying for the crisis caused by the system and the banks.The Isle of Wight Council has… Read more »

m butcher
2, February 2011 11:39 am

Some of his expences covered,for the next year.

wabbit
Reply to  m butcher
2, February 2011 1:09 pm

No chance we will be stumping up the cash for the wedding next.

Mo
2, February 2011 12:11 pm

Dear oh dear, what a shambles. Why didn’t the council involve the Mp at the lobbying stage? Or Geoff lumley? It seems that Councillor Pugh has messed up again, as he always does. He makes us a laughing stock.

Mike Starke
2, February 2011 12:57 pm

Hmmm, just over 4,000 quid… Just enough for Cllr Pughtin & Co to celebrate their tremendous success at dealing with their own political party in government with a bun fight at the Royal Yacht Squadron.

Esther Cowsley
2, February 2011 1:50 pm

If it wasn’t for the fact that this means considerable knock on effects for us then I might be saying: ” See Mr Pugh this is how it feels for us, lies and broken promises from those above you, calculations using incorrect figures…. familiar at all?????”.

hmmm
2, February 2011 3:38 pm

well David, i hope you also read the comment i just left on Cllr Lumleys statement. It seems to me, and i suspect most, that before even considering approaching westminster you should have had a meeting with Turner. Instead you let your personal dislike of him get in the way of doing your job, the job WE elected you to do, and the job WE can unelect… Read more »

Chris
Reply to  hmmm
2, February 2011 4:41 pm

He doesn’t have the qualifications, life experience or any common sense for that matter to do the job. The game’s up, it really is that simple and he needs to go now along with his mates

Grandad's Army
Reply to  hmmm
3, February 2011 10:00 am

Hmmm presumably does not read the County Press which carried the report just after Christmas that Pugh only had a few days notice of the meeting with the Minister and within I think it said one hour of getting that notice he asked AT to be part of the delegation. AT said he couldn’t come because of the short notice. Check this out if you don’t believe… Read more »

Eco-Warrior
Reply to  Grandad's Army
3, February 2011 10:04 am

I know who most people would believe.

Are you allowed to post here from County Hall, or are you one of the many ‘working from home’ today?

Pathetic.

Grandad's Army
Reply to  Eco-Warrior
3, February 2011 10:47 am

Why don’t you bother to check this out? Afraid it will not fit with your story? But suppose it does and therefore you are to say the least, just a tad wrong?
Better to be accurate and hate it than to be wrong and revel in it. don’t you think?

Haulage Bob
Reply to  Grandad's Army
3, February 2011 11:26 am

Can you not just answer the question Granddad? Your boss Dave does have a bit of a reputation for being less than honest on many matters.

No.5
Reply to  Grandad's Army
3, February 2011 12:20 pm

Grandad is precisely correct. This is the Story that the council released to the Count Press.

Doesn’t make it ‘entirely factual’ though does it and there are alternative versions.

hmmm
Reply to  Grandad's Army
3, February 2011 4:44 pm

i did read that in the county press, and also on here. Turner first heard of the meeting with very little notice. He should have known about the meeting long before then, even if he didnt know the exact time and date. He should have known that Pugh was trying to get a meeting. From what Ive read, Turner did NOT know because Pugh did NOT tell… Read more »

Mr J
2, February 2011 6:33 pm

Roger Mazillius should tap his mate Dave Pugh on the shoulder. ‘The game is up Dave, the electorate won’t take much more of this rubbish.’

Pugh makes old Shirl look like an intellectual.

Dave Q
3, February 2011 7:29 am

Isn’t it time Cllr Pugh and his collegues at County Hall are, as far as Cameron & Clegg are concerned, only very small fish in a very large sewage farm and the the IW means nothing to Westminster. Wake up Mr Pugh, start to represent the Island and your electors and not your own self interests.

mark francis
Reply to  Dave Q
3, February 2011 10:10 am

£4,000? Is Mr. Pugh sure it was the Government he saw, not Noel Edmonds? Now we have all been shafted by the Banker.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined