Parliament from westminster bridge with pink sunset in the background
Image: ian kelsall under CC BY 2.0

Letter: Assisted dying debate heats up as UK Parliament considers new legislation

OnTheWight always welcomes a Letter to the Editor to share with our readers – unsurprisingly they don’t always reflect the views of this publication. If you have something you’d like to share, get in touch and of course, your considered comments are welcome below.

This from Hans Bromwich, Cowes. Ed


The Assisted Dying Bill has just been introduced in Parliament. The Arch Bishop of Canterbury has cautioned that the right to die could become a duty to die.

Assisted dying is an extremely emotive topic. No one likes to think of those who are terminally ill living in pain, but there are numerous medical ways to alleviate suffering, and how long people might live, six months, a year, is not a precise science.

My brother in law, no longer with us, had numerous letters saying he only had a few months to live, he happily lived on for many years defying medical opinion.

Gosport War Memorial Hospital
Sadly, despite assurances to the contrary assisted dying is open to abuse. Let’s not forget the hundreds of patents, ‘made comfortable’, or should I say, killed by the administering of unnecessary powerful opioids at Gosport War Memorial Hospital.

After three failed Hampshire Police investigations on the case had to be given to Kent Constabulary who have just submitted their findings to the Dept of Public Prosecutions. Who precisely, and what were Hampshire Constabulary protecting with their botched investigations?

It’s been rumoured the DPP will probably decide that decades on there’s no public interest in pursuing the deaths of over 450 patients. Many of those who deliberately had their lives terminated, were expected to make a recovery.

Who gained?
Ask yourself, who gained by their deaths? Not those who loved them. Stretched NHS services would have benefited by not seeing a revolving door of elderly patients being readmitted with ongoing issues.

The Government will have profited by not having to pay State Pensions on those who had been despatched early, whilst in some cases HMRC will have secured huge sums in Inheritance Tax much earlier than otherwise expected.

A distressing solution?
In the current crisis, with our debt-ridden Country and NHS stretched to its limits, who truly believes our Government, who has already demonstrated its callous disregard for our elderly, and views those who are no longer economically productive as a burden, will not enthusiastically see assisted dying as an opportunity to help balance the books.

Government’s motives?
Can our Government and politicians be trusted? When it comes to providing the means for killing people it doesn’t like, nobody does it better than the British Government.

Just look at our ongoing military support for the genocidal war crimes being perpetrated in Gaza. I wouldn’t be too sure Parliament doesn’t railroad through the Assisted Dying Bill, not on moral grounds, but for economic expediency reasons instead.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
14 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
charlie197
19, October 2024 10:45 pm

Having watched my mum suffer with cancer for almost a year, with last few months so doped up on pain killers she never knew where she was, who she was and never knew we visited her everyday. That is not a way to live. I don’t want to go through that, I don’t want my son to see me like that, it’s not me… When I remember… Read more »

Tamara
20, October 2024 12:02 am

As a Private Member’s Bill, this proposed legislation faces unusual challenges, especially timing-out. There are only certain Fridays allocated for debating PMBs. And opponents of the Bill can talk it out. To help it on its way, it needs the backing of the Government, which this Bill does have, to persuade a large number of MPs to support it and attend the debate. Most MPs are back… Read more »

Jenny Smart
Reply to  Tamara
20, October 2024 7:20 am

We certainly can learn from other Countries. Canada introduced assisted dying some years ago, and has since seen mission creep as to who can apply, and for what reasons. There is a real danger that those suffering with let’s say depression will one day be allowed to end their lives. Once this genie is out of the bottle there’s no way of putting it back or knowing… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  Jenny Smart
20, October 2024 8:10 am

If you are opposed to people who are experiencing unbearable suffering from choosing the time and manner of their own death, at least try to do it from a place of dignified honesty. Figures for Canada show that their “medical assistance in dying” (maid) program accounts for only 4.1% of deaths in the country with cancer being the most common reason for seeking medical assistance to die.… Read more »

Angela Hewitt
Reply to  VentnorLad
20, October 2024 9:33 am

Very few people die in the comfort of their own home and under assisted dying even less, unless you are rich and can arrange for 2 doctors ect to be in your home to perform the deed. Better palliative care is required not the stress of havng to do the right thing. Which we all know, will happen.
Human behaviour is historic and constant.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Angela Hewitt
20, October 2024 9:52 am

Do you ever seek to support your assertions with evidence? In the UK around one third of people die in their own home. Under the Canadian “maid” program it’s around 40%. So that’s more, not less as you either mistakenly or dishonestly claim. No one I’m aware of has ever suggested that euthanasia should be an alternative to good quality palliative care, but rather a tool in… Read more »

VentnorLad
20, October 2024 8:25 am

Sometimes I agree with the content of Hans’ prolific letter writing.

Sometimes I disagree.

On this occasion I wonder whether this letter has been written by a tinfoil hatted alter ego!

henry
Reply to  VentnorLad
20, October 2024 10:02 am

OK, so the letter writer might hold a different opinion than you, it doesn’t mean that it is invalid.
Throwing abuse because you don’t agree with it is childish.

VentnorLad
Reply to  henry
20, October 2024 10:10 am

Hans and I have exchanged views via these pages frequently enough that he’ll recognise my lighthearted comment as a legitimate response to his hyperbolic musings.

If you consider that to be childish or abusive it says more about you than I.

henry
20, October 2024 9:55 am

The proposal as far as I understand it is that the terminally ill people will be albe to apply for assisted dying if they have less than six months to live, at which point they will need to obtain the permission of two doctors and the Courts. Who believes you can secure two independent doctors assessments and then process an application through the Courts within a six… Read more »

Jenny Smart
20, October 2024 10:28 am

NICE already determine who lives and who dies based on the cost of medication. Is the right to die simply a more cost effective way of dealing with the terminally ill? The assisted dying debate opens up a whole can of worms. For example, should parents with children who are in a vegetive state have all support withdrawn from them? Why does the State spend huge sums… Read more »

lauque
20, October 2024 2:43 pm

Good quality palliative care is already becoming harder to access (as we are seeing locally with the funding crisis at the hospice). The people I have known who had the best experience of palliative care for a terminal illness each had a medical professional in the family to arrange things, no corners cut, and in several cases to allow them to jump the queue for end of… Read more »

jamesrobin
20, October 2024 4:33 pm

There is a debate to be had on the issue of Assisted Dying.
Nevertheless the ideal that there is some “Deep State” conspiracy to rid society of the sick and aged, and that nobody does it better than the British Government is, to put it politely, a step too far.    

Snowwolf1
21, October 2024 12:44 pm

I fear we may have lost the plot over assisted dying. I always thought the whole idea was to allow those who chose to have assisted dying in this country and put their case to an Ending of life panel or board for approval – and then only if it was medically shown there would be no improvement to health or well being. So if Assisted dying… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined