Julian assange statue - created for Anything to Say protest

Letter: Our last chance to save investigative journalism and champion democracy

News OnTheWight always welcomes a Letter to the Editor to share with our readers – unsurprisingly they don’t always reflect the views of this publication. If you have something you’d like to share, get in touch and of course, your considered comments are welcome below.

This from Maggie Nelmes. Ed


Three courageous individuals are coming to Parliament Square in London on Saturday 24th June.

Two of them blew the whistle on war crimes, the other investigated and published their reports online. All have been imprisoned for speaking truth to power.

One has been held without charge or trial for well over four years in the UK’s top security prison, Belmarsh, while the US seeks his extradition to face trumped-up charges of espionage. For this, he will most likely receive a whole life sentence of up to 175 years, in a harsh maximum-security prison, in solitary confinement, from which he will never be released.

Who are these individuals who dared expose atrocities, allegedly perpetrated by members of American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange.

They will be in Parliament Square from 1 pm – not in person, but in the form of a life-size bronze sculpture by Davide Dormino, each standing on a chair. The fourth chair is empty, creating an opportunity for anyone with something to say about the global threat to those who speak truth to power.

One last chance
Last week, Julian Assange’s legal battle to stop his extradition to the US on spying charges suffered another blow, when a single judge in Britain’s High Court rejected his appeal.

Now he has one last chance – at a public hearing at the High Court, before two judges.

Wider implications
But Assange’s fight has far wider implications. Journalists around the world are gravely concerned that the founder and publisher of Wikileaks is being made an example of, to deter journalists and publishers from exposing government crimes and corruption.

Press freedom is being stifled. If Assange is extradited, this could be the final nail in the coffin for investigative journalism worldwide.

Threatens all of our rights to freedom of expression
“If Assange goes to jail, no journalist on Earth will be safe”, says the International Federation of Journalists.

“Extraditing Assange would set a dangerous precedent and threaten all of our rights to freedom of expression”, states human rights defender, Amnesty International.

Democracy itself is under threat, tweets the President of Brazil, Lula da Silva:

“His (Assange’s) arrest goes against the defense of democracy and freedom of the press. It is important that we mobilize in their defense.”

The historical weight of what happens next cannot be overstated
Reporters Without Borders’ Director of Campaigns, reacting against last week’s High Court judgement, states:

“It is absurd that a single judge can issue a three-page decision that could land Julian Assange in prison for the rest of his life and permanently impact the climate for journalism around the world. The historical weight of what happens next cannot be overstated; it is time to put a stop to this relentless targeting of Assange and act instead to protect journalism and press freedom.

“Our call on President Biden is now more urgent than ever: drop these charges, close the case against Assange, and allow for his release without further delay.”

Held in solitary confinement at Belmarsh Prison
Years of confinement in the Ecuadorian Embassy, where he was forced to seek sanctuary, followed by isolation and persecution after regime change in Ecuador, took its toll on Assange’s physical and mental health.

This deteriorated significantly when he was violently arrested by the Metropolitan Police inside the embassy, and sent to Belmarsh, where he has been held in solitary confinement.

Setting a very dangerous precedent
For the UK government to treat someone who has never been charged with an offence, let alone convicted, is to me an outrageous breach of civil liberties and human rights. And Julian is not a UK citizen, but Australian. If extradition is granted, this will set a very dangerous precedent indeed.

Article 4 of the US-UK Extradition Treaty states that “extradition shall not be granted if the offense for which extradition is requested is a political offense”.

Everyone is invited to Parliament Square on 24th June to take part in or listen to the orations on the fourth chair.

Here is a petition you can sign to urge the UK government to stop the extradition (already signed by more than 88,000 people).

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Polka Dot
21, January 2011 3:07 pm

They were also asked why they didn’t return calls to at least 3 of these interested parties, who had been in touch with the council on at least a couple of occasions. They were told their calls would be returned. Have they ? The intersted parties, at the time of Wednesday’s meeting were still waiting for call- backs from the Council that, up until that point in… Read more »

hmmm
21, January 2011 3:54 pm

i do hope that the council will give favorable consideration to any planning application to replace the winter gardens with a property of similar usage, but one more fit for purpose. Especially since the council has failed to maintain the building, any planning application to replace with a larger theatre with more seating, better facilities, and perhaps more parking should be very favorably viewed. Unfortunately, due to… Read more »

Polka Dot
Reply to  hmmm
21, January 2011 3:58 pm

I doubt the building needs knocking down, its structuarally sound. Have their been surveyors reports to the contrary then ? I dont think there has.

BigEars
Reply to  Polka Dot
21, January 2011 4:06 pm

Yes. There has. Isn’t this common knowledge? Part of the building is on the water way of the old mill pond. The building is also on an unstable cliff top, which it is loading precariously.

Polka Dot
Reply to  BigEars
21, January 2011 4:16 pm

Then i stand corrected. I was unaware of this, but still i doubt the whole building needs bulldozing.
My point being, if it can be bulldozed then built on for flats, it can be worked on and made sound for the running of the WG.

hmmm
Reply to  Polka Dot
21, January 2011 4:29 pm

not flats. it must be retained as a venue. but a new building would be better than trying to fix the wreck thats there now.

hmmm
Reply to  Polka Dot
21, January 2011 4:27 pm

who needs a survey? just look at the way the doors are warped. Thats not because the doors have moved, its because the building around it has moved. Frankly, even if the building was in excellent condition I would knock it down and build something larger. Thats the whole reason the winter gardens doesnt attract groups and acts, and the reason why it is in debt. A… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  hmmm
21, January 2011 4:33 pm

new building with apartments to finance it on top floor….

Polka Dot
Reply to  No.5
21, January 2011 4:35 pm

So they can complain about the noise and get it shut down ? Flats on top of pubs and clubs , unless soundproof, dont make good bedfellows, at least not the calibre who can afford luxury penthouse apartments with stunning sea views.

hmmm
Reply to  No.5
21, January 2011 4:45 pm

well, soundproofing is very effective. But personally, i would rather see a few dozen rooms on top that could be run as a hotel, not flats. but also i see no reason why a purpose built venue could not work on its own if it was run correctly.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, January 2011 4:54 pm

hotel rooms would work…modern building of this type have no porblems with soundproofing…its what they are designed for.

The venue would need income in the winter and after the honeymoon period when Ventnorians go back to never going there

brunio mccallister
Reply to  hmmm
22, January 2011 4:57 pm

WOah !!! what is it about knocking things down on the island. Why cant we celebrate and restore the building back to its Art Deco original best. If you want a cineworld or wetherspoons style building there or the rex/kingsview which is lame attempt at deco then go ahead. As soon as it is knocked down – like the Grange in sandown, some grubby developer will use… Read more »

hmmm
Reply to  brunio mccallister
22, January 2011 6:52 pm

well, if the building were structurally sound and large enough to attract acts which demand a minimum venue size, I would be the first to say keep it. But its neither of those things. It suffers from subsidence and is not big enough to attract big acts. So, knock it down, stabilise the land, and build a new venue worthy of the name. Instead of keeping a… Read more »

Polka Dot
21, January 2011 4:56 pm

That top room would make a stunning restaurant, sea views, that window wall opens up completely, what a place for a high class restaurant.
There is a lot that can be done, lets hope the councils involved are open to ideas.

Disillusioned
Reply to  Polka Dot
21, January 2011 6:01 pm

Hotel rooms would not provide an income during the winter – ask any Hotelier, especially in Ventnor.

hmmm
Reply to  Disillusioned
21, January 2011 7:01 pm

in winter i would imagine any venue will only be open part time anyway, so i would put a cinema screen in there too. It could provide maybe half a dozen showings per week. A restaurant could also be run using an outside area enclosed with canvas with patio heaters, and obviously the inside areas. Also, theres no reason why shows cant continue over the winter is… Read more »

Polka Dot
Reply to  hmmm
21, January 2011 7:25 pm

If we were all doing nothing, this section wouldnt have any comments and the meeting last week would have been empty. If you generate enough interest for the average person on the street to take an interest, and that usually involves something they can get enthusiastic about, then you will be onto a winner. If its self serving and for the benefit of rich fat cats or… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Polka Dot
21, January 2011 7:29 pm

shame all the money went to a concession who underpaid the rent.

The building in the future must be treated as a whole (holestic) and not have bits hived of for local profit

hmmm
Reply to  Polka Dot
21, January 2011 8:08 pm

the not bothering comment was aimed at disillusioned. From his comment, it seems he is saying why bother. My comment had just a little sarcasm

bes
22, January 2011 7:55 am

methinks there’s a developer in the midst of these comments! I’ve noticed one of the old ‘Bunbury’ crowd around the WG of much lately! Let’s face it, Ventnor had town meetings about the WG years ago, and for the public’s suggestions for its use. How about all the Other town meetings to save the public property along the Esplanade (paddling pool) and look what happened…the council let… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined