Chris Whitehouse

New school transport policy will have ‘bizarre and Kafkaesque consequences’ says Councillor

This in from Chris Whitehouse, in his own words. Ed


In a statement today, Cllr Chris Whitehouse (Newport West), has pointed out that the way in which the policy is drafted means that children from atheist, agnostic, and other faith families who want to attend Carisbrooke College could in future be forced to apply to Christ the King College, the Island’s Christian high school.

Cllr Whitehouse says,

“The Independent Administration has proposed that in future free travel to high schools will only be provided to a student’s “nearest” high school, provided that school is more than three miles from the student’s home.

“But, that definition of “nearest”, officers have confirmed, is measured as the bus drives rather than crow flies. This means that for many children in the West Wight Christ the King is their nearest high school because the bus drives up Wellington Road, Newport, in my ward, past Christ the King, to get to Carisbrooke College.”

The practical effect of the rule change, warns Cllr Whitehouse is that,

“In future, children in the West Wight, if they wanted to benefit from free school travel to Carisbrooke College, would first have to apply for a place at Christ the King College even though they don’t want to attend it and even though they may not meet its entrance conditions. Only when they are turned down by Christ the King could they then ask for free travel to Carisbrooke. What is worse, children from atheist, agnostic or other faith families who definitely don’t want to attend Christ the King might find themselves forced to apply there and be admitted under the provisions of their community places scheme! This would be Kafkaesque and completely bizarre, you just couldn’t make it up.”

He goes on to say,

“The new rules would also, of course, lead to Christ the King College devoting huge resources to processing large numbers of pointless applications.

“I tried to explain this to Cllr Richard Priest at a meeting of the Scrutiny Committee as long ago as 5th June, but I fear he didn’t understand the point and went ahead with publishing the paper regardless. Hampshire officers have now been very helpful in spending time with me and confirming my understanding is correct. Hopefully, the Independents will listen to commonsense and find a way of respecting the rights of those families who choose not to have a Christian education for their children.”

The Councillor also registered concern about changes to provision for support for students aged 16 and over,

“At a time when we are seeking to encourage as many youngsters as possible to continue their education and training, it does seem unfortunate that the Independent Administration is proposing to remove assistance in future with the costs of travel for this important group.”

Full details in the document below. Click on the full screen icon to see larger version.


Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
17 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nitonia
9, July 2014 10:51 am

I’d like to hear more about Christ the King’s entrance conditions. Why will everyone from the West Wight be denied places?

Caconym
Reply to  Nitonia
9, July 2014 12:14 pm

I think you are confused by the wording of the article. Kids from the West Wight are no more likely to be denied a place At CtK than from anywhere else. What the article is saying is that parents who WANT their children to go to Carisbrooke will have to put CtK as their first choice (and Carisbrooke as their second) and hope to be turned down… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  Nitonia
10, July 2014 9:51 am

You have to pretend to be a God Botherer – or, given the archaic title of the school, a Fifth Monarchist.
Besides which there appears to be perfectly good cycle path along the river.

Caconym
Reply to  Mark Francis
10, July 2014 12:27 pm

Actually you have to do the complete opposite. If you live in the West Wight and want your child to attend Carisbrooke or Medina AND benefit from free bus travel then you HAVE to put CtK as your first choice, but make damn certain they reject your application. Rather than claiming to be a “God Botherer”, you need to claim you are an die-hard atheist who thinks… Read more »

Colin
9, July 2014 1:01 pm

Right, let’s see.

The Council decides to reorganise the school system so that middle school children are no longer educated locally but are required to travel longer distances to senior schools.

A couple of years later, the council doesn’t like the cost of financing their own reorganisation so try to pass the cost on to the parents.

And they wonder why criticism comes their way.

Caconym
Reply to  Colin
9, July 2014 1:46 pm

To be fair, it was the previous administration who were responsible for the school reorganisation fiasco.

Doesn’t make these proposals for free (or, rather, the lack of free) school transport any less of a mess, though!!

phil jordan
Reply to  Caconym
9, July 2014 6:10 pm

suruk the slayer: I wonder why the previous administration did not sort out the school transport issue when they decided to make wholesale changes to the school system on our Island….? Would it not have been part of the process of re-organisation to actually do that…? Cllr Whitehouse would do well to express criticism of the kafkaesque and completely bizarre actions of his conservative colleagues previous management……… Read more »

Chris Newman
Reply to  phil jordan
10, July 2014 2:40 am

But the Conservatives did sort out the buses to suit the new School 2Tier system, its the Indies that have caused the problem by removing the bus solution.

Cynic
Reply to  Chris Newman
10, July 2014 8:17 am

Mmmm! Mussolini’s claim to fame was that he “sorted out the trains!” :-)

phil jordan
Reply to  Colin
9, July 2014 6:17 pm

Colin:

I’m afraid the previous administration implemented the (failed?) re-organisation of schools on this Island.

In addition, to accompany that (now documented) failed initiative, they omitted to include implementation of a schools transport Policy to match the accompanying re-organisation.

Yet one more issue left over from the last administration to sort out….

Colin
Reply to  phil jordan
10, July 2014 9:12 am

@ phil I am well aware of which administration did what. I remember the headlines of the announcement of the £28 million contract with SV made with misplaced pride and wondered why it was such a wonderful idea to spend £4 million a year transporting the pupils to schools miles from their homes whilst closing schools on their doorsteps. And now we have the free school opening… Read more »

RJC
9, July 2014 3:17 pm

Simple solution. Move the bus stops.

Cynic
Reply to  RJC
9, July 2014 3:30 pm

,,,,and/or the bus route?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
9, July 2014 3:34 pm

e.g. Yarmouth Rd/Forest Rd/Gunville Rd/Taylor Rd?

or

Middle Rd/Gunville Rd/Taylot Rd?

Chris Newman
10, July 2014 2:30 am

This is exactly the point that I made in my entry on the objections petition. It also effects Medina College as they will lose ALL West Wight students to Carisbrooke & Christ the King. They will also lose all South Wight to the new Free School, and Sandown Academy, and all the West Cowes Students. Medina has Students starting in September 2014 from 39 Isle of Wight… Read more »

Chris Newman
10, July 2014 2:36 am

Sorry, I meant my comment to be a reply to Chris Whitehouse’s Post. :)

Mark Francis
10, July 2014 9:58 am

Actually it is probably not Kafkaesque as such – since that would imply an existential questioning of our identity & the meaning of our role within the world and a corruptible society rather than which bus to take.

Either that or waking up as an insect.

This term might however be alluding to the entrance requirements to “faith” schools.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined