Sandown Rivoli

Planning Committee make decision on Rivoli Cinema: Outcome a surprise

Members of the Planning Committee vote last night to approve an application to demolish the former Rivoli Cinema in Sandown.

The decision went against the Isle of Wight council planning officer’s recommendation for refusal.

The officers argued that,

“The proposal would result in the unjustified loss of a non-designated heritage asset, which makes a significant positive contribution to the character and appearance of the Sandown Conservation Area and local distinctiveness.”

Committee decision
Members instead vote to approve the application to demolish the former cinema.

Chair of the committee, Cllr Julia Baker-Smith, told OnTheWight,

“I proposed deferral in order to give the applicant time to produce the evidence required to justify demolition as the main issue in my view was that insufficient evidence had been provided on the viability or lack thereof of the alternative conversion scheme.

“The vote on my proposal fell and a Proposal for approval contrary to officers recommendation was made by Councillor Hollis.

“It was the view of the majority of the committee that the loss of the building had been sufficiently justified, that it had reached the end of its useful life, that the replacement scheme was acceptable and of benefit to the regeneration of Sandown.”

Full details
Full details of the officer’s recommendation can be found in the paper below from page 38 onwards.


Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
20 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed
21, October 2015 11:00 am

Nice to see council have finally seen sense and doing something to help tidy up Sandown.

Colin
21, October 2015 11:21 am

Well, there you go. A sensible decision at last. If only it weren’t cloudy I’d be able to see the pigs fly by.

neilc
21, October 2015 11:28 am

What a shame. In a town suffering from a lack of vision and trade this could be a beacon; examples such as The Rex in Berkhamsted show what some thought and investment could produce for both locals and tourists alike, and there is investment there – if only the landowner would accept it, or enter a deal to see how it pans out. What will be built… Read more »

Colin
Reply to  neilc
21, October 2015 11:36 am

@neilc

I understand your sentiment.

Unfortunately, there needs to be a sound, financed, viable business plan and there wasn’t.

Given the alleged housing shortage on the Island, I suspect you will be correct in the outcome.

ThomasC
Reply to  Colin
21, October 2015 1:03 pm

The difference between Berkhamsted and Sandown?

Berkhamsted isn’t having the life choked out of it by extremely limited and over-priced travel options to travel outside of that county.

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Colin
21, October 2015 1:07 pm

Berkhamstead? Where did that come from? Berkhamstead has many exLondoners living there or commuting to the captial on a daily basis. It’s the sort of place where the Au Pair can bring up your children. Nursery DayCare costs £50 a day. Many residents commute out for work.

Not sure that’s what we want for the island.

neilc
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
21, October 2015 9:35 pm

@Vix Lowthion Hi Vix – I made the comment about Berkhamstead purely because I’ve visited The Rex several times and know its history. It’s an example of a derelict building that’s had investment and been converted into something unique, and is now a interesting addition to its community (which, yes, is more affluent than Sandown). It also has a substantial following that goes well beyond Berkhamstead’s borders:… Read more »

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
21, October 2015 9:45 pm

NeilC or ThomasC?

I’m confused….

Bruce Webb
Reply to  Colin
21, October 2015 2:41 pm

Hi Colin, what exactly was wrong with our business plan – we would love to know and learn from our mistakes. We have accountants and lawyers, architects, cinema owners, producers and property developers help us and advise us to make it water tight. Tell us your expertise and when you read the business plan and we will pass around your notes on what was unsound. Many thanks… Read more »

Colin
Reply to  Bruce Webb
22, October 2015 10:02 am

@Bruce My apologies, that comment was a bit blunt and not correct. It was the financing part and acquiring the building that I understood to be a bit lacking and if that isn’t correct, then I apologise again. I’ve followed the great attempts by yourselves and others to raise the money needed over the last couple of years and it wasn’t intended to be critical of any… Read more »

Jim Edwards
Reply to  Colin
22, October 2015 10:18 am

Sorry your plan to rejuvenate he building has failed. What happens to the money people such as us contributed to this scheme?

Richard
21, October 2015 12:21 pm

Can’t wait to see the soulless, cheap’n’nasty block of flats they build in its place!

Tanja Rebel
21, October 2015 12:22 pm

So it is sound to demolish an iconic building and replace it with bog standard flats? Where is the long-term thinking? Neilc is absolutely right: This Island could do so much better if it realised the true value of its Heritage.

Jonathan
21, October 2015 1:38 pm

I used to travel through Sandown on the No 3 bus. It used to stop opposite the Library, close to the sea. There’s a horrible old wreck of a building there, used to be a hotel or something, made up of several old houses joined together. It’s derelict and just about the biggest eyesore you could ask for right there in the heat of the town. Why… Read more »

Chris
Reply to  Jonathan
21, October 2015 4:32 pm

I imagine your referring to The Savoy, which is currently being demolished – a beautiful old hotel which should never have been allowed to fall into such disrepair, but these days no one seems to care and when they do they just want it pulled down. A crying shame.

dave
Reply to  Chris
22, October 2015 5:49 pm

Check out the owner, who also owns the Grand Hotel, Sandown Hotel (which is now receiving attention) and the Royal York Hotel , Ryde, amongst other properties.

yjc
21, October 2015 2:07 pm

What concerns me greatly is the fact that here is another decision that went against planning officers recommendation. Planning Officers are paid, trained and have experience in planning matters.

eddo
21, October 2015 6:07 pm

time, still to put hands in pockets and put money on the table that means your hands and pockets not others

Tanja Rebel
22, October 2015 8:16 am

To eddo: Why should private money pay for our collective Heritage? If there was a fair, progressive tax system in this country then we could have good services. These services should include preservation of iconic buildings. It should not be left to private investment or lottery money for that matter. If you still insist that private should pay for collective, then why not ask the bankers to… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined