Ryde Inshore Rescue Lifeboat Appeal

£2,000 successfully raised but more needed to purchase new lifeboat before the busy season starts. Ed

LifeboatAt the end of 2010 Ryde Inshore Rescue launched an appeal to help them raise £6,000 to replace their second lifeboat Ryde Rescue 22.

Thanks to the support of the public and organisations the first £2,000 has now been raised, including a large donation of over £1,000 from the St Mary’s Press Sea Angling Club last weekend.

Many anonymous donations made through Just Giving have also been gratefully received.

First milestone reached
This is our first milestone reached and has allowed us to place the order for the lifeboat, however for us to have this craft in place ready for what we expect to be an increased busy summer season at Ryde Inshore Rescue due to the council cutbacks affecting the beach lifeguards we need to raise the remaining £4,000 as soon as realistically possible.

Donations can be made online via Just Giving or directly to the Inshore Rescue Centre based at Appley.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ewald
4, February 2015 9:17 am

a Video re TTIP and its dangers

easy to understand for UKIP voters

http://action.sumofus.org/a/ttip-video/?akid=9195.7550208.V6wzRI&rd=1&sub=fwd&t=1

Darcy
Reply to  ewald
4, February 2015 6:00 pm

Keep pushing this ewald! Essential viewing for sceptics, Sciolist, and the ill informed.

ewald
Reply to  Darcy
4, February 2015 6:41 pm

according to a USA study at Tufts University 600000 jobs will be lost in the EU
http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/policy_research/TTIP_simulations.html

Steve Goodman
4, February 2015 9:40 am

TTIP represents a huge threat to our health & wealth; it’s good that more politicians & voters are taking an interest as the campaign continues.

mat
4, February 2015 9:58 am

The EU-US trade deal is the latest in a series of neoliberal global trade deals, including the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (Gats) agreed in 1995 and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) proposed in 1999. Opposition from campaign groups and trade unions succeeded in keeping public services out of Gats. A broad coalition defeated the MAI altogether. Although… Read more »

The Sciolist
4, February 2015 7:10 pm

So only the Green party care about this? Says it all really.

Nothing to see, nothing to worry about, move on.

Cynic
Reply to  The Sciolist
4, February 2015 7:38 pm

It looks like it! The Labour Party is making weak noises of ejection but one or more of its people is promoting TTIP . “Top level Labour Party support for the TTIP to go ahead (on which Andy Burnham seems less than wholehearted) is very evident from Labour Party stringpullers. Douglas Alexander advocating ‘the avoidance of cheap populism’1 does not bode well for Labour Party responsiveness to… Read more »

ewald
Reply to  The Sciolist
7, February 2015 6:12 am

Why don’t you tell what Tory_UKIP’s plan is to balance the UK Economy after the worst Trade Balance figures as yesterday reported astonish the Business community?

Cynic
Reply to  ewald
7, February 2015 11:09 am

No ewald it is worse than that. The Tory plan is the next step in the sell-out of the UK to the US that started with Thatcher and continued with Major/ Blair.

Take a look at the way the “statesmen’s pension fund” (aka the US Carlyle Group) has avquired more and more of the UK- sepcially in the defence industries.

Rowan
Reply to  Cynic
7, February 2015 12:05 pm

It’s like the Goliath Corpin Jasper Fforde’s Thursday Next novels.

Cynic
Reply to  Rowan
7, February 2015 12:47 pm

Orwell’s “1984” is far closer to the mark?

Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 7:54 pm

As the Labour Party candidate on the Island I thought that it would be helpful if I explained our position on TTIP. Far from making ‘weak noises’ we are very aware of peoples concerns about TTIP and I can assure voters that, while we have been addressing this for a long time, the Greens have only just realised how important this is. The Labour Party supports trade… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:07 pm

With respect Stewar,t that is political gobbleygook straight out of the Campaign Handbook. “we are very aware of peoples concerns about TTIP” “we have been addressing this for a long time,” (but done nothing about it!) “The Labour Party supports trade agreements which can bring significant benefits through boosting trade and growth, securing and creating jobs, and bringing down costs and extending choice for consumers.”…. yeah, yeah,… Read more »

Rowan
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 10:45 am

‘the Greens have only just realised how important this is’? Keith Taylor organised a meeting at the September 2014 Green Party conference. I was there, along with dozens of other people. Not quite ‘only just’. Sorry Stewart, usually agree with most of what you say, but this time I wish you could say that the Labour Party would oppose this attempt by the corpocracy to undermine democracy,… Read more »

Rowan
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 10:49 am

However, I am very glad to hear you say that you and the Labour Party have concerns about public services, standards, and the Investor State Dispute Resolution. Unless all those concerns can be met – and met fully – we should oppose the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Of course trade can often be good for people, but it can also be harmful if it is enforced… Read more »

watchdog
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 11:11 am

Stewart’s last point says it all, really, about the predatory nature of this proposal. It’s apparently OK for US corporations to target public services and infrastructure in the States of the EU, but EU corporations won’t be allowed to target individual States of the US.

Just like the one-sided Extradition Treaty with the US that our supine government signed up to.

Cynic
Reply to  watchdog
5, February 2015 11:18 am

But Labour will still not commit to withdraw the UK from TTIP if elected?

Tosh
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 1:33 pm

SB you sound more like that back stabber who leads?your party than a PPC for the IOW please for once try to think for your self

Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:10 pm

Cicero, really, can’t you do better than cut and paste what I write?

I am making my views known because there is a conversation and if you don’t agree – that’s fine but, please – be a wee bit original.

Cynic
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:17 pm

Stewart- I cut-and-pasted elements from your electioneering statement to give you the opportunity to rebut my criticisms.

So why not try to be original yourself and not just cut-and-paste from the Campaign Handbook.?

Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:19 pm

Well, at least you have a lively imagination!

Cynic
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:49 pm

Stewart- you ignored my question ” if the Labour Party won the election, would it reject the UK involvement in TTIP?”

A simple yes/no will suffice.

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Cynic
4, February 2015 11:19 pm

Green Party would reject TTIP as a whole, for the reasons outlined by Ewald above.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
5, February 2015 1:02 pm

But they won’t be in government, or possibly even have any MPs, so easy to stay.

Cynic
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
5, February 2015 1:17 pm

…. and the Labour Party? Still not easy for it to be definitive on its position on TTIP, Geoff?

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
5, February 2015 2:19 pm

Cicero. I imagine actually being in government is a lot harder than spraying around easy pledges when you have no chance of being in government.

Cynic
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
5, February 2015 2:29 pm

Geoff- history shows that promises made during electioneering by *all* political parties expire on the day after the election! Remember Brown’s pledges? Secure the recovery – Secure the recovery and halve the deficit through economic growth, fair taxes and cuts to lower priority spending. Raise family living standards – Raise family living standards, keeping mortgage rates as low as possible; increasing tax credits for families with young… Read more »

ewald
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
8, February 2015 9:08 am

you seem to not understand!
Read the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaty any Cllr should know by heart!

Only the EU can sign or give sovereignty away

Cynic
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
8, February 2015 9:40 am

Those interested might want to read a legal analysis of the sovereignty question that exists between the UK and the EU, @ .sjol.co.uk/issue-4/a-critical-analysis-of-eu-member-state-sovereignty-under-the-treaty-of-lisbon-sovereignty-v-democracy “The Act- European Union Act 2011- will thus “ensure that in the future this Parliament and the British people have their say on any proposed transfer of powers to the EU.”]William Hague describes the EU Act as a direct response to the democratic deficit… Read more »

Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:57 pm

Sorry, but I thought that I had.

To be clear, as I have said here and elsewhere, there are some parts of TTIP which could be beneficial and, provided nothing is signed before the election, the Labour government will be negotiating, although this is a European agreement and not just a national one.

ewald
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 2:10 am

without the ISDS included in TTIP the USA is not interested in TTIP they only want to control us fully!

and btw:

Japan did not sign the TPP as its called in the Pacific and send Obama home without a signature.

Why did the Labour media not report this
and kept it secret?

US-Japan deadlock points to no April TPP deal for Obama …

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/da025a50-c082-11e3-a74d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3Qpeo2zap

Cynic
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 8:41 am

Not a yes/no answer Stewart but a weasel-worded one! (Maybe that *is* the answer, i.e. either you or the Labour Party will not commit either way?)

So I repeat : ” if the Labour Party won the election, would it reject the UK involvement in TTIP?” Yes or No?

Which part of the question do you not understand?

Stewart Blackmore
4, February 2015 8:58 pm

Of course Andrew Turner is in full agreement with the whole proposition – and he is the alternative.

ewald
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 1:47 am

only after the Green party leaked a confidential TTIP paper in Brussels we know about the deal Labour including UKIP and the other parties wanted to keep secret from the British public and sell the British sovereignty over to the US…. http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-industry/green-party-leaks-confidential-ttip-paper-300760

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
5, February 2015 12:49 pm

This general election is not merely Stewart Blackmore v Andrew Turner. There are at least 6 candidates – and 3 parties on the Island (UKIP Conservative and Green) got more support than Labour in the most recent elections last May.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
5, February 2015 12:58 pm

A European election, under a P.R. system. A general election is when voters make real choices, not exercising protest votes.

peaceful_life
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
5, February 2015 3:29 pm

@Geoff.

Which I imagine must be quite an awkward situation for parties to try an vilify those ‘protest’ votes for leaning towards towards the very same policies that the ‘real choices’have feigned for so long.

Mark Francis
5, February 2015 9:33 am

Might one compare our relationship with the USA & big multi-national with the relationship that Tesco’s have had with their suppliers?
…& we are not Tesco in this analogy.

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
5, February 2015 9:42 am

Orwell had it right in “1984” The UK was called “Airstrip One” for the superpower ‘Oceania”- remember the UK Cruise missile bases , Fylingdales Early Warning Ssystem etc?

Mark Francis
Reply to  Cynic
5, February 2015 10:26 am

Dead right Cicero! The proposed 2Strategic Defense Initiative” relied on Fylingdales to spot Ruskie missiles heading towards the USA so they could intercept them mid Atlantic. However since Fylingdales was outside the protection zone the obvious tactic for the Rooskies would be to blow the bejasius out of us first! What government would have been mad enough to agree to that? Guess. PS. “No fighting gentlemen –… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
5, February 2015 10:48 am

Yep! Living within a couple of miles of a Cruise missile base, and two nuclear research and weapons manufacturing sites for 20 years- with a reputed 40 megaton USSR missile aimed at them- we reckoned our “Four Minute Warning” was measured in microseconds!.

Rowan
5, February 2015 10:53 am

There’s some good information here:

http://www.waronwant.org/campaigns/trade-justice/ttip

Rowan
5, February 2015 10:55 am

Here’s a link to the Europe-wide ‘Stop TTIP’ petition:

https://stop-ttip.org/

ewald
Reply to  Rowan
5, February 2015 11:33 am

Hi Rowan, good link thanks !

let me reply with a link against TTIP from the Nr One man in Europe at the moment….

Change Europe!

http://www.alexistsipras.eu/index.php/news/transatlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership-ttip-who-benefits-who-loses?cbprofile=1

Cynic
6, February 2015 8:45 am

I see that our papal knight and ex-temporary-campaign-manager for AT has taken a few minutes away from his business to fire a Parthian shot ** at the Greens in this week’s CP. Perhaps he could take another few minutes to tell us if the Conservative Party supportts TTIP including the potentially punitive rights for US corporations to sue EU governments that enact legislation that threatens profits? (**The… Read more »

Mark Francis
6, February 2015 9:37 am

& if Mr Cicero cannot give us the old classical allusions who can?

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
6, February 2015 2:43 pm

Sorrty about that MF! Once and educator, always an educator!

I just like the juxtaposition of CW taking a shot back over his shoulder at Vix while retreating :-)

Mark Francis
6, February 2015 2:46 pm

No – you go for it.
“Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes” I always say
(my family will confirm this)

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
6, February 2015 3:16 pm

Ironically it was said by the priest (Loacoon) but it hasn’t stopped priests of various religions promising Paradise in exchange for something! :-))

Mark Francis
6, February 2015 3:24 pm

Did it at O level.

Cynic
Reply to  Mark Francis
7, February 2015 11:25 am

Those were the days when we had to study Latin and Greek for exams! The Aeneid and Caesar’s Gallic Wars are imprinted on the mind e.g. “Omnia Gallia in tres partes divisa est”. :-)

Mark Francis
7, February 2015 8:15 pm

“Flumen est Arar…” – happy days!

ewald
Reply to  Mark Francis
8, February 2015 10:52 am

@Cicero- according to this link ,the UK’s government trade secretary Lord Livingstone seems to honour the Lisbon treaty..

https://stop-ttip.org/blog/trade-ministers-beg-brussels-to-remove-more-national-sovereignty/

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined