Scrabble money :

Solent LEP launches call for projects to boost economic growth

This in from Laura on behalf of Solent LEP. Ed


The Solent LEP Chairman and Chief Executive have today (Friday) sent an open letter to organisations across the Solent calling for transformational growth projects that will allow the area to compete for funding with the Northern Powerhouse.

The call is seeking to identify projects which will deliver transformational change to the Solent economy and, projects identified through the process, will form the basis of future LEP bids if further funding opportunities come forward following the Government’s Spending Review in late November 2015.

Solent Growth Deal
The call for projects is part of the Solent LEPs work to update the Strategic Economic Plan for the area and build on the £151.9m Solent Growth Deal, announced in 2014, which will deliver 6,000 jobs and 11,000 new homes in the area.

Projects are encouraged from all organisations with an interest in driving growth, productivity and innovation in the Solent and the LEP is specifically seeking projects which will;

  • Unlock sites for housing and employment
  • Improve our connectivity within the Solent and beyond
  • Stimulate and support innovation
  • Improve the skills and talent of our current and future workforce
  • Support business growth through access to resources and advice
  • Support key strategic sectors

The call comes in advance of the Solent LEPs Annual Growth Conference, expected to take place in January 2016.

Organisations with growth proposals should submit these to the LEP by 12 November. Further information on how to submit a proposal is available online.


Image: Phillip Taylor under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lilly
9, October 2012 5:22 pm

Will there be a covenant for ‘peace’ too that attracts funding, where NHS staff and other public services that were cut get re-instated? As someone once said ‘there has never been a good war, or a bad peace’.

einsteinsghost
9, October 2012 11:43 pm

I’m not sure what this Covenant actually means in practice, whatever, I am starting to feel rather uncomfortable with this national wave of almost obligatory hero-worship of the troops and the increasing list of benefits,concessions etc that are now apparently due to soldiers who are/have served in Afghanistan (The latest being, Boris Johnson giving out free tube travel in London) I totally support the troops, but it… Read more »

Zanna
13, October 2012 10:23 pm

Will this include raising awareness and understanding of people and cultures of invaded and occupied countries. For example. an understanding of what daily life is like for ordinary people in Afghanistan who live in one of the poorest countries in the world and under occupation. If you looked carefully at the news last week, you might have heard a report from Afghanistan about how the U.S./NATO forces… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Zanna
14, October 2012 4:20 am

The Taliban where shooting young girls in the face before the UN backed invasion….not much love and peace to be had from such blind people.

Cynic
Reply to  No.5
14, October 2012 10:00 am

@No.5 “The Taliban were shooting young girls in the face before the UN backed invasion….not much love and peace to be had from such blind people.” The Taliban act was despicable but remember also that Israel’s IDF continues to kill Palestinians including young people (like Rachel Corrie and the girl below. “Israeli soldiers shot dead a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in the southern Gaza Strip yesterday. The girl… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Cynic
14, October 2012 3:41 pm

sorry …didn’t realise it was a competition for the most horrible murder.

(Israel should be under the strictest sanction to improve it human rights and if that meant UN putting in troops – then yes)

Cynic
Reply to  No.5
14, October 2012 4:07 pm

You brought up the murder of the girl as a cultural issue. The same cultural yardstick should be to Israel.

BTW the UN is not in either Afghanistan or Iraq(nor likely to be in Iran in the not too distant future. The invaders are the US and its acolytes.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
15, October 2012 1:55 am

Just my belief that the UN should be the peacekeepers in all these conflicts

No.5
Reply to  No.5
15, October 2012 1:56 am

The same cultural yardstick does reply…but one is no less or more horrible than the other hense the competition comment.

I don’t mind if you agree with me.

random bloke
Reply to  Zanna
14, October 2012 10:08 am

“Was it a cultural misunderstanding that caused the death of these innocent women?” No. It was due to the fact that they were walking in the mountains collecting wood before dawn. The operator of the drone aircraft would have mistaken them for Taliban out carrying weapons. Cultural differences are important. They should not however be used as an excuse to avoid responsibility. I wonder what people like… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  random bloke
14, October 2012 3:45 pm

we didn’t enter the war because of the holocaust…we entered the war through guilt of inaction for our partners by treaty in Europe. We entered the Peninsular War because of a treat with another of our long term friends in Europe – Portugal following Napolean elevating his family to the Kingship of Spain and Italy in an attempt to set up a dynesty that would have been… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  No.5
14, October 2012 4:08 pm

Aaaarghh! I am agreeing with No.5! :-))

random bloke
Reply to  No.5
14, October 2012 10:25 pm

well now, I didnt say we entered WW2 because of the holocaust. Nor did I give a reason why we entered the peninsular war. What I did say is WHAT IF we had refused because of cultural differences? What if we had decided the holocaust was internal politics and we should have stopped at the german border, or even stayed out of the war altogether regardless of… Read more »

Don Smith
14, October 2012 8:54 pm

Let’s just get out of other peoples countries, and let them sort their own affair out. We are no longer the world’s policeman. Never should have got tagged to the USA. They need wars and conflict so they can sell their armaments to every one. Without making planes and other armaments, four million US workers would be redundant; to a lesser degree the same can be said… Read more »

Cynic
15, October 2012 9:09 am

@No. 5 “ust my belief that the UN should be the peacekeepers in all these conflicts ”

Agreed. But unlikely to happen while five countries can veto such an action.

Zanna
15, October 2012 10:09 pm

One is funded by the Ministry of Defence (Up to £30 million over 4 financial years has been set aside) and the other by donations. Obvious which will have the most resources to promote its aims! The aims of UK veterans for Peace are to: 1. Resist war through non-violent action 2. Support persecuted war-resisters 3. Counter militarism in society and educate on the true nature of… Read more »

Don Smith
15, October 2012 11:00 pm

What a load of untidy lot we have in the main photo. Eyes all over the place [Eyes front]. Berets to the back, front and centre; all over the place. Can’t see if they are marching instep. But the photo does not show a very disciplined company of soldiers. What happened to their uniforms, have they just come out of the jungle? Our servicemen are an untidy… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined