two chairs

The Isle of Wight will have two MPs. This is how they’re thinking of splitting the Island

The independent Boundary Commission for England (BCE) has today (Tuesday 13 September) published the initial proposals for splitting the Isle of Wight into two parliamentary constituencies.

Since the Government announced the Isle of Wight constituency would be split into two, there has been much speculation about how the split would fall – East/West or North/South.

How the split breaks down
As can be seen from the map below, the proposed split is for East/West.

The split follows ward boundaries from Fishbourne down to Niton. At first glance it looks as though the ward of Chale, Niton and Whitwell, which historicaly had been part of the South Wight Ward, would be separated and grouped in the West Wight constituency. We’ll seek clarification and update if any change.

Consultation launched
The release of the constituency proposal marks the start of 12 weeks of consultation, during which the Commission is keen to hear from you in order to help shape the proposed new constituency boundaries.

Click on image to see larger version

Proposed boundary split for two IW constituencies

Proposed boundary split for two IW constituencies

Guidance notes
If you have an interest in procedure of the constituency boundary being revised, highly informative guidance notes by Dr Ed Gouge, formerly Lecturer in Politics at the University of Leeds can be found at the bottom of the article. They are well worth a read to gen yourself up on how it all works.

Once the consultation has taken place the BCE must report back to Parliament in 2018 and, if agreed by Parliament, the new constituencies will be in use at the next scheduled General Election in 2020.

Nationwide announcements
Under the proposals announced, only 68 of the existing 533 English constituencies remain unchanged.

Sam Hartley, Secretary to the Commission, said:

“Today’s proposals mark the first time people get to see what the new map of Parliamentary constituencies might look like. But they are just the Commission’s initial thoughts ­ during the next 12 weeks we want people to take a look and tell us what they like and don’t like about our proposals.

“Parliament has set us tight rules about reducing the number of constituencies, and making them of more equal size, and we now need the views of people around the country to help us shape constituencies that best reflect local areas. Use our website to tell us what you think, or come along to one of our public events to give us your views in person.”

Have your say
If you have a view on the changes to the constituency boundary you can have your say using the BCE’s Website or by attending a public hearing in the area (we’ll let you know if/when any take place on the Isle of Wight).

The consultation closes on 5 December 2016 and there’ll be a further two rounds of consultation next year.​

Click on full screen icon to see larger versions



Image: indieman under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
30 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt
13, September 2016 6:57 am

The IW Labour Party could invite Corbyn to Stand?

Julian
Reply to  Matt
13, September 2016 7:36 am

Would you still be out voted by the Green party as in the last election?

Mat
Reply to  Julian
13, September 2016 7:43 am

What!Corbyn might have to get a T-Shirt(VL IWCP)?

Vix Lowthion
13, September 2016 7:39 am

The Isle of Wight is lucky in this consultation – we will get extra representation with a 2nd MP. However from an island point of view, it is crucial that our two new MPs can put aside any differences and work for the good of the island. I am hopeful that this will happen! As to the result – 2 Conservative MPs? Or a progressive alliance agreement… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
13, September 2016 8:16 am

If, by “progressive alliance agreement” you mean that candidates from certain parties will not stand in order to defeat, in this case, the Tories then, nope. Denying voters the right to select an MP of the party of *their* choice (not yours) is profoundly undemocratic and disenfranchises huge numbers of voters. I, for one, will almost certainly vote *for* the target of such an action if my… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Caconym
13, September 2016 8:32 am

And what if both “sides” decide to play the same game? If the left leaning parties (Lib-dems, Labour, Greens) come to a “progressive alliance agreement” and field only a Green candidate in one constituency and a Lib Dem in the other, and the right leaning parties (Tories, UKIP) decide to counter by having their own “progressive alliance agreement” and field only the Tory candidate in one and… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Caconym
13, September 2016 9:24 am

StS:

….you make a strong case for being Independent !

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  phil jordan
13, September 2016 9:29 am

But Phil, that just puts more lost deposits into Government coffers. I thought you wanted more cash for the Island from central government

billy builder
Reply to  phil jordan
13, September 2016 9:34 am

Phil, with respect all an independent candidate could ever do is further erode the centre-left vote even more, unless that is the all the left of centre parties agreed to a single independent candidate.

An independent MP in the Commons would also be a lone voice that would never be heard. That is not what the Island needs.

phil jordan
Reply to  phil jordan
13, September 2016 9:56 am

GL/BB: ….think ‘light hearted’ and add a spot of witty humour … ;0) The serious point however is that the Government are on course to reduce the total number of MP’s from 650 to around 600. Yet, at the same time, increase the MP’s for our Island…. somewhat of a contradiction? Regardless of our standing MP the possibility the Island will be split will become confusing and… Read more »

nico
Reply to  phil jordan
13, September 2016 11:20 am

Too true (Phil), it could be like 2 ferrets in a sack. Instead of focussing outwards there will be internal political wars way beyond what we’ve been used to. Two lots of well-paid MP’s offices and staff, each MP competing for resources against the other, for ‘their’ side of the Island … Treating our coastal boundary like the outline of a mainland constituency where only the population… Read more »

billy builder
Reply to  Caconym
13, September 2016 9:26 am

Suruk, the first past the post system is unfit for purpose and will only ever return a democratic result if there are only two candidates standing. Without some sort of cross party alliance there will always be a Tory MP returned for both of these seats on IOW and each MP would be returned with significantly less than 50% of the popular vote. I would suggest that… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Caconym
13, September 2016 9:26 am

Lib Dems ‘left leaning’. Ha-ha-ha. The party who allowed the Tories to ride roughshod over the UK for 5 years

billy builder
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
13, September 2016 9:40 am

Geoff, don’t you mean the party that prevented the Tories from right wing excesses all of which are now coming to fruition. The Tories will be bringing back hanging next!

tiki
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
13, September 2016 7:49 pm

Not sure why you’re laughing when Labour has been in the wilderness on the island now for how long?

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
13, September 2016 10:53 am

Spot on Suruk – our current first past the post electoral system does the island and indeed the UK electorate a disservice. It encourages parties and MPs to ‘play games’ to be elected and that’s not good for democracy. A progressive alliance could take many forms. Yes you could stand candidates down in certain constituencies. Or you could have an Open Primary and the progressive parties choose… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
13, September 2016 12:06 pm

I don’t recall mentioning or querying the merits, or otherwise, of the first past the post system. My concern is purely with dirty deals done in back room which deny the electorate the right to chose the MP of *their* choice. And as for the idea of an “Open Primary”? That works so *very* well in the US Presidential elections, doesn’t it? Despite having Open Primaries the… Read more »

Addmanniw
13, September 2016 8:15 am

I think this is a win win for all. The affluent rural west (including chale niton and whitwell) which are influenced and schooled in Newport get to stay together whilst the poorer towns of Sandown Bay, Ryde and Ventnor can cling together with the hope of a more progressive candidate who has seen the poor schooling decaying mass tourism infrastructure and run down town centres. Any hope… Read more »

Barbara Penman
Reply to  Addmanniw
13, September 2016 9:08 am

Bembridge,Seaview, St Helens, Wootton, upper Ryde, poor?

Barbara Penman
Reply to  Barbara Penman
13, September 2016 11:54 am

Forgot to add Binstead and Havenstreet.

We will now have two MPs more inhouse fighting, and it is the tax paying minions that will have to pay I suppose.

bones
Reply to  Addmanniw
14, September 2016 7:24 am

Oi Addmann……..just you leave Ventnor alone !

Julie
13, September 2016 8:50 am

I think we on the decaying east side should build a wall and get them westerners to pay for it ?

Julie
13, September 2016 8:58 am

Can we just separate completely from the mainland and form are own government we could call our new party ” Wight Funnel ” they could control or borders …………..

okayanyway
Reply to  Julie
14, September 2016 12:34 am

We are just about to lose all evidence of our separation from the mainland in the form of the Solent deal.

Caconym
Reply to  okayanyway
14, September 2016 8:09 am

Indeed.

Don’t forget to respond to the consultation so this never happens.

Colin
13, September 2016 9:23 am

We have one MP now who doesn’t represent us. Perhaps two of different flavours might be better. Depending on the electorate of course, so probably two donkeys then.

tr
13, September 2016 11:15 am

what they should have done is leave the island as one constituency, and scale up all the others to make them the same size – that would free up far more space on those green benches in the commons.

Mat
13, September 2016 11:30 am

The island does need to have definition of constituencies on the principle of one island 2 MP’s. This is our democratic right regardless of who is elected. The division should not be monitored on the basis of “left” or “right”. It is our constitutional right to be represented in the parliament on the basis of size of the polity. Voting in the next general election should be… Read more »

mywifesheelsare2high
13, September 2016 5:09 pm

Why do we need two useless Conservative MP’s one is enough.

billy builder
Reply to  mywifesheelsare2high
14, September 2016 6:46 am

No, one is one to many

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined