Westridge Farm map

Last chance to have your say on plans for 80 dwellings in Ryde

There are just a few more days for Islanders to lodge their comments on a revised planning application for 80 dwellings on land south of Westridge Farm, Hope Road, Ryde.

Comments lodged with the previous application still stand, but residents are being invited to have their say on the amendments.

Protection for endangered species
Objectors argue Westridge Farm and surrounds is “one the few remaining parts of its [the Island] ancient agricultural history that has remained undisturbed and unchanged for centuries”.

Concerns have been raised about traffic, parking and infrastructure. The destruction of mature Oak trees and centuries-old established hedgerows, as well as protection of red listed endangered and/or protected species is cited.

Objectors argue the Bat survey carried out by the developer should have taken place over ten days, not three. Adding that as we are now at the end of the Bat season, “some may already have gone into hibernation and so the survey may not give a clear picture of the population”.

At time of publishing over 200 comments had been lodged.

Save Westridge Farm
The Save Westridge Farm group have been active this year opposing plans to build over 80 dwellings on land that has been farmed for over 700 years.

In September they ran a campaign with scarecrows around the area to raise awareness of the proposal.

David Marshall, a member of the ‘Save Westridge Farm Action Group’ has lived next to the farm for fifty years and has witnessed the loss of seven milk producing dairy farms within a mile radius.

He said,

“With Westridge Farm now the only working dairy farm left in the area and one of only nine dairy farms left across the whole Island producing milk, I believe it is essential we save it for future generations.

“I fear the consequences of the planning proposal to build over 80 properties on part of the farm will be closure of the farm and more large scale housing development across all of its fields.”

Have your say
Comments can be lodged via the council’s Planning Website. Public comments are open until close of business on Friday 25th November.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
18 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Caconym
23, November 2016 9:17 am

The problem is that dairy farming is in dire straights due to the low gate price that farmers get for their milk.

Is this truly “Save Westridge Farm” or merely “Stop the housing development”.

If this is *truly* about saving the farm, what do the protesters plan to do to ensure the farm is, and remains, a viable business?

Mike Vallender
23, November 2016 10:03 am

My own concern with this several is that it appears to be about a major change of use from agricultural to residential wher I have neither seen or read a balanced discussion on how this is likely to be implemented. Yes the land owners has the right to go through the necessary planning application stages but these changes are through low laying lands flood plains, and areareas… Read more »

yjc
23, November 2016 10:13 am

Please be aware that if you comment or write a letter with joint names (Mr & Mrs etc) – that only counts as one comment. If you comment separately that counts as two comments.

Simon Cooke
23, November 2016 12:28 pm

I grew up in Hope Road and my parents lived and owned houses in the road for over sixty years. It does sadden me how built-up the area is becoming. I’d like to make people aware that there is another planning application (TCP/15929/D) that concerns Hope Road that also has a deadline of this Friday. I fear that no residents know about it because the notice has… Read more »

KEITH POTT TURNER
23, November 2016 1:21 pm

Let’s hope the land is saved, as seven farms have already gone within a mile, it is our ancient agricultural heritage there are lots of applications all over the country, some on ancient woodland. People who cite them as ‘progress’ usually have an added interest in the planning of these schemes, on the whole most people like the countryside left for their children’s future. Councils and planning… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  KEITH POTT TURNER
23, November 2016 1:36 pm

I agree, our “ancient agricultural heritage” is important. And I’d love small dairy farms to be part of our children’s future. But the reality is that with low wages, we all appreciate low prices in the supermarket. To achieve low prices, our farmers must exploit economies of scale. The future is in larger farms. I’d also like our children to be able to buy or rent a… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  KEITH POTT TURNER
23, November 2016 3:45 pm

So, Keith,

What do you intend to do about preserving this farm apart from protesting about its closure?

yjc
23, November 2016 6:52 pm

Please also be aware : Though the published closing date is this Friday for comments – comments are accepted up to the day of the planning meeting that is discussing the application.

So, if you miss the deadline – you can still comment on any planning application and it will be taken into account.

mark francis
23, November 2016 7:11 pm

Everybody gotta live somewhere

bones
24, November 2016 5:19 pm

Are we going to build another Hospital too ? We can’t get enough doctors and nurses for the current population. St Mary’s always seems to be on some sort of alert situation.

Concerned of Wootton
25, November 2016 1:21 am

80 dwellings – say 4 people per dwelling (Parents and two children) 320 extra people on the Isle of Wight. Can the sewerage system, power supply and roads cope with these additional demands. Then there is employment, health care, burials etc to be considered too. I’m all for extra housing, but lets make sure we have the infrastructure in place to cope before we build

Caconym
Reply to  Concerned of Wootton
25, November 2016 8:38 am

*** Bangs head repeatedly on desk *** How many times does this has to be explained. New homes don’t magic people out of the air to fill them. There aren’t suddenly going to be 320 people popping into existence just because some homes have been built. Most of the people who will move into these homes are already here. They are already here, using the infrastructure, driving… Read more »

yjc
25, November 2016 8:55 am

Don’t forget that 80% of Pan Meadow properties were for new people to move here from the mainland.

There were hoardings up the mainland motorways encouraging people to move here.

Caconym
Reply to  yjc
25, November 2016 9:54 am

Because people would really move here without a job here, wouldn’t they? And well paid jobs that’d attract people aren’t exactly growing on trees around here. I can just see someone who lives in, say Fareham, seeing one of those ads and thinking “Hmmm, instead of my 20 minute drive into Havant for work, I can live on the IW and look forward to 4 hours of… Read more »

Mike Vallender
25, November 2016 10:04 am

Can someone please explain balance to me. The landowner is obviously trying to do what meets their personal needs,regardless of whether that means losing tenant farmers, crop sustainability, nature and wildlife concerns and so forth. The balance is how that is achieved to meet the needs of all through the changing of both the landscape and the needs of the community that sit within it. Consultation and… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Mike Vallender
25, November 2016 12:40 pm

A farm has to be profitable to survive. Dairy farming is not profitable.

The protesters bleat about “saving the farm”, when they actually have little interest in saving it as a going concern.

But what should be done with the land if it cannot be farmed, and cannot be built on?

Mike Vallender
25, November 2016 10:11 am

The other point I will make is that new houses can also lead to new jobs, new activities and new opportunities if people work together to achieve these things. Sometimes itis like putting together a jigsaw for the future, but has to include bringing all the components together to achieve a picture for the future, and that is what sometimes appears to be lacking in these cases.