Road PFI: Government Spending Review Indicates Isle Of Wight Plans

There’s been a long period of uncertainty where it’s not been clear if the Isle of Wight road PFI scheme would go ahead.

Road PFI: Government Spending Review Indicates Isle Of Wight PlansAmong the mass of information that we’re looking over about today’s Comprehensive Spending Review we found something highly relevant to the Island – an indicator which way the new government is likely to go.

Under the section on the Department for Transport, on page 46, item 2.23, it says

The Government’s intention is to proceed with PFI projects which will deliver sustained improvements in highways maintenance in Sheffield, Hounslow and the Isle of Wight and extend the Nottingham tram network with two new lines. As resources are tight, the Government needs to ensure that every pound is spent to the maximum benefit. The Government will therefore be urgently working with the four local authorities to establish how these projects can be delivered affordably, in order to deliver the much needed benefits.

Key points
“The Government’s intention is to proceed with PFI projects with the Isle of Wight.”

“The Government will therefore be urgently working with the four local authorities to establish how these projects can be delivered affordably, in order to deliver the much needed benefits.”

Summary
So for those keen on the roads, PFI, the signs are good.

Have a read for yourself.

Image: joiseyshowaa under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
18 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BigEars
20, October 2010 4:17 pm

The PFI is a trojan horse that we should be wary of.

No.5
Reply to  BigEars
20, October 2010 4:39 pm

totally against this policy..all it has done/will do is allowed the council to get away with its negligence on the maintanance front.
It will lead to even more cuts in budgets elsewhere because they have been using the cash for highways maintance on other things and they simply be handing that budget in it entirety to the PFI companies

Flomax Relief
Reply to  No.5
20, October 2010 4:50 pm

Having worked for and been made redundant from a PFI firm after it spent (for ‘Spent’ read ‘Wasted’) all the money employing people from India who have never worked in construction in the UK or on giving all the senior management nice cars,and had to go into administration, ANY PFI scheme is a real worry. I am also concerned that the IWC do not have a good… Read more »

Squeaky
20, October 2010 5:50 pm

The key words here may be that they will ‘work to see how these projects can be delivered affordably.’ To my eyes this suggests a clear get out. All the government need do in future weeks and months is claim that our PFI could not be delivered affordably so they have decided to scrap it. In that case we would have spent millions on something that never… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Squeaky
20, October 2010 7:33 pm

meanwhile thay pay a deptartment in excess of £300,000 PA to deal with PFI matters (not that its achieved much)

Through the key hole
20, October 2010 6:50 pm

How those Goons who run this Council ever imagined the government would back this P.F.I.scheme for the Island I will never know.My advice get out as soon as possible don’t waste any more Tax payers money.

Chris
20, October 2010 10:18 pm

Good news…for lawyers.

James Arrow
21, October 2010 12:22 am

Told you so. They were warned about PFI, we told them. We said it would cost a packet and we will still be paying for it in years to come with the next deficit.We told ’em, they would not listen. They are goons – and dingbats even.

Ron
Reply to  James Arrow
21, October 2010 9:50 pm

I am amazed and saddened that so many people can condem something that can only be good for this Island. This is free money to the island – a grant, not a loan!! Its a bit like winning the lottery and saying I’m not taking the money!!

Squeaky
21, October 2010 10:02 pm

It’s not a grant it’s a loan. The repayments will cripple us. All of us want better roads, PFI schemes are the government equivalent of credit cards at extortionate rates of interest.

I deal in facts
Reply to  Squeaky
21, October 2010 10:59 pm

Squeaky

You are talking rubbish. It is not a loan. It is a grant that the Council does not have to repay. Like so many people on this blog you are blind to the truth.

intentionally blank
Reply to  I deal in facts
21, October 2010 11:02 pm

i thought the council had to commit to paying their entire roads maintainence budget every year… hardly free money.

If you seriously beleive anything is free in this world, you are deluded. You dont get owt for nowt.

No.5
Reply to  I deal in facts
21, October 2010 11:24 pm

are you crazy….it will cost us the councils budget for highway maintance (11 million) every year for the duration of the contract (20 Years)

The council has never spent this entire budget on the roads..the avergae being about 6 million..the difference being used on ‘other things’…these ‘other things’ will now either not be paid for or will find their money from somewhere else.

Either way…WE PAY

romeantique
21, October 2010 11:03 pm

“This is free money to the island – a grant, not a loan!! Its a bit like winning the lottery and saying I’m not taking the money!!”

Those Tories certainly have succeeded in pulling the wool over your eyes Ron. To think you criticise Labours fiscal policy and then come out with this.

Nibbles
24, October 2010 7:06 pm

For gods sake i wish people would read up on the pfi before stating a load of codswallop. The PFI is a grant and the council will not pay a penny of the actual pfi back. As part of the deal though, the budget that the council has each year for highway maintenance has to also be paid into the pot. So the council although tied to… Read more »

Squeaky
24, October 2010 7:16 pm

Nibbles, if this goes ahead the total spent on the PFI from IWC income each year will far exceed the total spent in the past twenty years. Where will the present mob and future councilllors find this money? I think the asnwer is obvious, cuts and rises.

No.5
Reply to  Squeaky
24, October 2010 8:45 pm

The council has never spent more than 6.5 million of its highways budget of the 11 Million pot…. The council will pay a penny…..11 Million of them. They also employ a team to manage these PFI claims at a cost in excess of £300,000 in wages. And what do we get…roads that council should have been maintaining properly for the last 20 years brought up to scratch… Read more »

ebod
23, November 2010 2:12 pm

Monbiot explains PFI pretty well: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/22/pfi-private-finance-refuse-debt

Did we hear back from Nibbles/Ron/I deal in facts?

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined