£500,000 To Be Spent On Advisors For Waste Contract

Back at the tail-end of February, VB covered the £1 million pounds of council budget that the ruling Conservative group have put aside in 2012/3, just preparing for the Waste contract.

Money:Today, we’ve learnt how some of this will be spent.

Half of it will go on ‘advisors’. The council say the “maximum spend” on these will be Legal £120k, Financial £190k and Technical £190k.

Delegated Decision notice
Those amounts quoted are only for a part year’s worth of work, as the financial year has already started.

Further figures are revealed in the Delegated Decision notice (when we get to find out that a decision has been made by a Cabinet member, without the interference of it being discussed in public first).

To prepare the “production of the Outline Business Case”, they estimate costs will be £100,000.

Full details of what has been decided are embedded below for your convenience.


Update 11.05.12: Further to the council advising VB that the waste contract is a PPP not PFI, any references to PFI have been removed from this article.

Image: Tax Brackets.org under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
22 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tanja Rebel
12, April 2012 4:37 pm

I wonder how many libraries this could have saved…

PAUL MULLERY
Reply to  Tanja Rebel
12, April 2012 4:59 pm

Don’t be silly Tanja, a council is not there to provide services but to re-distribute your council tax to consultants. How do you think they could accumulate a million pound pension pot with your attitude!

We are now in a new financial year so you make sure your direct debit is in order otherwise the consultants will be charging us interest on overdue payments.

I.Reader
12, April 2012 5:06 pm

Trebles all round!

Cynic
12, April 2012 5:38 pm

The Council has promised £1 million savings by 2015 from the new waste collection strategy. Is that now only £500,000 with the other half going into the private pockets of their favourite “consultants”?

Ratepayers should be told- maybe VB would like to investigate?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
16, April 2012 3:03 pm

If you want documented evidence how PFI is transferring public money into private pockets while escaping public/parliamentary scrutiny and costing more than publicly funded projects while providing worse services- read “The Captive State” by George Monbiot. The book was written in 2000: since then the number of signed PFI projects has expanded to 713 by November 2011- and those being negotiated at that sate were 50 (including… Read more »

Retired hack
12, April 2012 5:47 pm

One thing they may want to ask the consultants is how not to get into a situation where recyclable island waste is being sent to the mainland to be processed, only for non-recyclable mainland waste to have be brought back over to fuel the gassification plant. This may possibly be saving on landfill tax, but green it ain’t and it’ll certainly be costing someone £££’s. It couldn’t… Read more »

Green-wash
12, April 2012 5:58 pm

Exactly – this council has no shame and certainly no green credentials. Eco Island alwys was a joke.

This is a shocking waste of our money.

”Island thinking” = they’re having a laugh at your expense.

James P
12, April 2012 6:23 pm

This is the roads PFI revisited. Still, it’s not their money…

Rea
12, April 2012 6:47 pm

I advise our council to avoid any PFI scheme like the plague…my advice is free and would save the island taxpayers millions of pounds.

adrian nicholas
12, April 2012 7:28 pm

Remember the widely hailed former waste PFI contract extended to a further 4 years at cost of an extra £90K consultancy fee was admitted by Ed Giles 2 full council meetings as not being particularly good value for the island public. The new improved MK.2 essential version has the dubious honour of being headed up by ex-Highways PFI head honcho, Jay Jasandhra at great value of further… Read more »

daveq
12, April 2012 7:52 pm

I wonder just how much research our illustrious council did before employing J.J. as their pfi expert? I believe he was in charge of maintenance at 10 Downing Street (under Tony Blairs rule) when parts of the roof collapsed? I bet he’ll be long gone when the the roads pfi falls apart and Island council tax payers have to pick up the pieces yet again!

boredathome
12, April 2012 11:28 pm

Ooh, are we going to be in the “Rotten Boroughs” section of Private Eye again?

playingthenumbers
12, April 2012 11:34 pm

Oh goody, those nice patricians with a penchant for spending our money on anybody but somebody local are doing it again. More tellingly, the IWC committing to paper the phrase ‘not fit for purpose’ seems prophetic, yet it is so simple. The uncomfortable truth of all PFI deals is once the service’s cost centre is ramped up, it can never return to the public domain – you… Read more »

Bluey
Reply to  playingthenumbers
13, April 2012 9:01 am

Bravo Vanessa!. I am worried that the officers who arranged the distribution of wheelie bins may get involved in any contract – beyond perhaps procuring a book of stamps.

vanessa churchman
13, April 2012 12:40 am

There is an organisation called Improvement & Efficiency Southeast who have an offshoot for waste, called Waste Improvement Network (WIN). It has been set up as a not-for-profit section and so far 141 Councils are using its framework to procure their Waste Disposal strategies. It is completely legal and is compliant with all the necessary European Directives with regard to waste disposal. The whole idea is to… Read more »

Peter
13, April 2012 8:54 am

I thought we had enough people who “talk rubbish” on our council,already?
The money the council will make from our saved waste for recycling,will surely offset the consultants fees! Especially when they stop transporting it to the mainland! Who would have thought it,my old telly going on holiday to England!

Black Dog
13, April 2012 9:55 am

Why do we employ highly paid directors of services and then employ consultants? Surely the highly paid member of staff is being paid that salary for his/her expertise and knowledge????? The choice is clear to me either get rid of the consultants or get rid of the directors involved, you can not have both. This highlights the point I made in an earlier blog – that our… Read more »

PAUL MULLERY
Reply to  Black Dog
13, April 2012 6:05 pm

This consultant malarky is something I mentioned to bosses when I was working. If they have to hire a consultant, what are we paying them for? My argument was, if there is part of my job I don’t feel competent to do, can I hire a consultant to do it for me? I was told I was being facitious. Definition of consultant: A person who uses your… Read more »

adrian nicholas
13, April 2012 10:14 am

The last landfill site ended up being the property of the private contractor. What is extremely alarming of the need for a private company and dodgy PFI to buy up another brownfield site for a new landfill. That as noted in Paper S.19 is that the likelihood will be the same contractors as the Highways PFI. So the long term cost of a new site and operation… Read more »

Rose
13, April 2012 5:53 pm

Sounds like the NHS on the Island.

Chris Wilmott
16, April 2012 3:54 pm

I think I must be losing it: it seems our glorious leaders are planning to spend half a million of our money to pay for advice on how we can all be stitched up for years on a PFI scheme. I propose they save the lot, and just DON’T DO IT!

guiness
16, April 2012 7:39 pm

perhaps lining up a place on a company board,for when they get voted out.Trying to curry favour.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined