Council Says Upcoming Waste Contract Is A PPP Not PFI

We have just today been written to by the council to tell us that the upcoming Waste contract, that they recently decided to spend £500,000 on advisors on, is not a PFI.

They wrote, “Firstly we should point out to VentnorBlog that at no stage has the Isle of Wight Council said that the new waste contract will be sourced under PFI. There are no government PFI grants for this and it will be funded by the council.”

Searching iwight we found the council calling it a PPP (Public Private Partnership) instead.

VB first referred to the upcoming Waste contract as a PFI a month ago, then in two further articles (we’ve amended them).

Didn’t exactly rush
Given how obsessively we hear the council check VentnorBlog, it’s a great shame that they have left it this long to let us know.

They don’t usually hold back when they think that we might have incorrect information on the site.

For example we once referred to the Ventnor Botanic Garden as Ventnor Botanic Gardens (adding an ‘s’) and received an email from the council press office an hour after the article was published, pointing out our error.

We’ve let you know as soon as the council wrote to us about it. It’s a great shame that the council didn’t use the same urgency.

Image: Chris Isherwood under CC BY 2.0

Update 16:13: Changed headline and a subhead slightly.
16:52 Rewrote intro to include council quote.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
32 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
yjc
14, January 2015 1:40 pm

Please be aware that if you are putting a comment on the Planning website for any planning application not to put it on as a joint comment as it will still only count as one comment. So don’t put a couple, or Mr & Mrs – each put a separate comment then they count as two. Petitions also only count as one too however many signatures are… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  yjc
14, January 2015 2:00 pm

Far better for the opponents of the application to distribute a proforma letter to their supporters to be posted to the planners, for whom numbers of objections are important.

temperance
17, January 2015 5:23 pm

Please everyone write this is so important, don’t leave it to someone else or think I’ll do it later. Do it now you can view others letters on the planning website if you wish for ideas. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. visit the link below and put TCP/31352/A in the TCP Number box. DO IT NOW… Read more »

Island Monkey
17, January 2015 7:17 pm

temperance – a good quotation, totally inappropriately applied. This is a proposed housing development, not the reintroduction of the gas chamber. Please, try and keep a sense of perspective?

temperance
Reply to  Island Monkey
19, January 2015 7:31 pm

matter of opinion monkey…the destruction of wildlife habitat can be seen as evil. If it was on tv being presented by joana lumey at some miles away rain forest and greedy money grabbing loggers were chopping it down some might see it as evil. maybe it depends on your soul or lack of. hey hum.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined