Children with hands up in class with text on top which says "allowing children to know there are people to help them is 100% the right thing to do"

Call for Isle of Wight volunteers who are passionate about child protection

This from Michelle Barry, NSPCC Schools Coordinator, Isle of Wight. Ed


The NSPCC is searching the Isle of Wight for volunteers who are passionate about child protection to join us in our fight for every childhood.

This autumn the NSPCC’s ‘Speak out. Stay safe.’ volunteers will be returning to primary schools in the Isle of Wight, helping us to protect a generation of children from abuse and neglect.

Learning how to speak out about abuse
Volunteers will visit primary schools to deliver ‘Speak out. Stay safe.’ workshops to Year Five and Year Six children, that teach them about the different types of abuse and who to speak to if they need to.

Are you energetic and enthusiastic?
Our workshops are age-appropriate and memorable and need an energetic and enthusiastic person to deliver them.

You’ll work alongside other volunteers to make sure at the end of each session the children feel empowered and know who they can speak out to if they are worried.

Training and practice sessions
When you volunteer with us, you’ll get lots of initial training which includes practice sessions, home-study and multiple visits to schools to help you learn the workshop materials.

When you start delivering the sessions, support will be on offer from both your supervisor and other experienced volunteers.

Learn new skills
You’ll also get the opportunity to learn new skills, be a part of a friendly team of like-minded people and most importantly make a huge difference to children within your local area.

For this role, we can only accept people over the age of 16.

Volunteering takes place on weekdays during school hours and we ask for a minimum commitment of two school visits a month.

Get in touch
If you are interested in volunteering as a ‘Speak out. Stay safe.’ volunteer and want to find out more about the role, the next step is to contact the Volunteer Recruitment Team at VolunteerRecruitment@NSPCC.org.uk.

We look forward to meeting you!


Image: © NSPCC

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
davidwalter
29, August 2014 1:32 pm

The Scrutiny Committee having agreed that resolution, is the Full Council legally bound by that decision or may it (in law) ignore it?

Colin
Reply to  Sally Perry
30, August 2014 8:59 am

quote “without adherence to formal consultation time periods and outcomes the Council’s reputation will be entirely undermined and perhaps raise legal risks.” unquote

Umm, I think the council’s reputation is long gone. It matters not who is in charge and of course it was always the last lot.

Matthew James Martin
Reply to  Colin
31, August 2014 8:51 am

To address your quote Colin ;- ”Umm, I think the council’s reputation is long gone. It matters not who is in charge and of course it was always the last lot.” I don’t understand why you say this? I think you’ve missed a few things here Colin perhaps? We all do it from time to time of course. From what I gather, St Helen’s Parish Council has… Read more »

Matthew James Martin
31, August 2014 8:34 am

This proposal has to be continuously opposed. If this measure is approved, it will open up a whole can of worms over other issues and liberties everybody should have a basic right to. My thanks goes to Councillor Lumley and the Scrutiny Committee once again.

davidwalter
31, August 2014 3:48 pm

Rules that restrict the freedom of people to go about their lives, work and recreation should only be considered if the case is compelling. From all I’ve read, the case is almost non-existent, let alone compelling. It has all become a stupid political battle in which the losers will be the public. What is the problem with saying “OK, bad idea, let’s drop it chaps”?

Food for Thought
31, August 2014 6:35 pm

It is a statutory requirement to have a scrutiny committee. Yet there is no requirement to act of the committee’s recommendations. Why therefore even bother having a committee? Just another Government initiative that seems to have no clout. (This was a labour initiative). When scrutiny works as intended then it is a useful tool but both the last ruling party and the current one both ignore recommendations… Read more »

retired Hack
Reply to  Food for Thought
31, August 2014 6:55 pm

The barrister was absent from the Executive meeting in question.

Food for Thought
Reply to  retired Hack
31, August 2014 7:18 pm

Thanks R.H. No wonder a stupid decision was made.

Robbo
Reply to  Food for Thought
3, September 2014 8:38 am

Though the barrister is the councillor for St Helens, favours the Order, and no doubt had influence behind the scenes.

tiki
2, September 2014 6:10 pm

In some countries dogs have to be kept on leads at ALL times. There are more important issues to worry about.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined