CHAMPS’ debut single video premièred on the Guardian Website

CHAMPS

Readers may remember a while back we put out an appeal by Isle of Wight band CHAMPS asking swimming pool owners in the area to allow them to be filmed diving in.

Well, as you’d expect, Ventnor came up trumps and the said video was made.

Today it has been premièred on the Guardian Website and it looks mighty fine!

Shot in Ventnor
The video sees the Champion lads, Michael and David, running through Ventnor town, up on the Downs and jumping into a number of swimming pools around Ventnor (see if you recognise any of them).

The video and track are excellent.

Michael Cragg from the Guardian said

It’s probably safe to assume it didn’t take brothers Michael and David Champion long to come up with their band name, CHAMPS. Thankfully their lack of imagination when it comes to a moniker isn’t reflected in their songs, which manage to capture a lovelorn sense of melancholia, specifically on the breezy, sun-dappled chorus that anchors new single My Spirit Is Broken (“Don’t be the reason why there’s cold in my heart,” they coo).

Apparently the brothers first decided music might be a good vocation after their dad brought a battered old guitar home from a charity shop and the pair started composing a new song straight away. While that song didn’t make it onto their début EP – called Spirit Is Broken – there’s a definite sense that this songwriting lark comes naturally, with melodies and hooks tumbling over themselves.

Although My Spirit Is Broken is being given away as a free download from their official site, they have still made a video, which is handy because it’s really very good. Filmed in their home town of Ventnor on the Isle of Wight, it follows the brothers as they run through the town performing the popular local past time of “pool jumping”, which, as the name implies, involves jumping in people’s swimming pools (usually drunk). It looks like a lot of fun

Find out more about CHAMPS and download the début single for free from their official website. If you’re in London on Monday 29th July you can see them at Servant Jazz Quarters.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
steve s
18, November 2011 7:29 am

David Pugh sent this through?! :-S

Steephill Jack
Reply to  steve s
18, November 2011 8:15 am

In the spirit of “up yours” perhaps ?

steve s
Reply to  Steephill Jack
18, November 2011 8:25 am

Could be that, Jack. If it is, I find it disturbing. It makes the whole thing look like a game which is won or lost. But it’s not a game, is it? Government (even local government) is about peoples’ lives. Jobs and health and education. Food on the table in really difficult times. I was naive enough to assume that the leader of the council might have… Read more »

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  steve s
18, November 2011 9:22 am

We didn’t attend the count so are grateful for the results to be sent through at 11.13pm last night. We’re sure if it had been the UKIP or LibDem winning, they would have done the same.

daniel clarke
18, November 2011 8:03 am

Congratulations Stuart. Shame though there wasn’t enough competition in the election, including no independents and labour candidates.

Simon Perry
Admin
18, November 2011 8:46 am

The Conservative candidate, Stuart, won by five and a half times the number of votes. That’s a huge winning gap.

Spirit of Tony Benn
18, November 2011 9:25 am

This was a bad day for democracy, nothing to crow about David. Your day will come, when the whole Island has their say on your administration.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Spirit of Tony Benn
18, November 2011 9:37 am

What a ridiculous comment. The Conservative candidate received nearly 77% of the votes cast (and I was pleased to be one of those putting a X against his name)so it was a stunning victory and a very good day for democracy.

Poll-pundit
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 10:57 am

How do you celebrate an election, where the only candidates were a Tory and UKIP, the far right Tory group? How do rejoice, when only dyed in the wool Tory supporters bothered voting at all? Let’s agree that around one in four people in this ward are probably Conservative’s? In that case, no-one else voted, only your own people? You Tories were the only people canvassing and… Read more »

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Poll-pundit
18, November 2011 1:32 pm

Poll pundit – another bad loser!

Asite2c
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 11:00 am

“Pleased to be one of those putting a X against his name”. So you must be pleased to see further cuts to public services, the selling of public assets, dodgy consultations, poor leadership, a lack of democratic decision making, more poverty and job losses, wasting council tax payers on consultants and double dippers, huge salaries for Benyon and other directors etc. Perhaps you live a very comfortable… Read more »

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Asite2c
18, November 2011 1:35 pm

Asite2C is a typical Socialist who regularly posts abuse on here about those with whom he does not agree yet persists in promoting the policies of the Labour party that left this country in a dire financial state following 13 years of failing to keep government spending under control.

And also Asite2C is another bad loser!

hammerjammer
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 1:42 pm

There we go, it’s all Labours fault. It was the bankers that brought about the 2008 credit crunch. Would you say that it is the Tory’s fault for the desperate state we are in now, or is it a eurozone crisis? Just like your Government, I am sure you will say it’s will be someone else’s fault

No.5
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 1:51 pm

wow…do some people still beleive this tory propaganda that even their own leader has stopped flogging. Its so sad when local politics and the charlatans that run the Islands council are judged by national standards…and the Tories that do it hide behind this old line (its not our fault nationally, when it is entirely their fault locally…. I don’t just blame Pugh and co for the abysmal… Read more »

Asite2c
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 1:54 pm

Well you have got 2 things wromg. I’m not a socialist, Labour voter or a bad loser. I believe in fairness and a caring society which helps those who are vulnerable and struggling to survive. Not making the rich richer such as bankers, big businessmen, double diggers and politicians who fiddle their expenses. Please tell me what good this Tory council have ever done for the Island… Read more »

DH
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 11:37 am

“…very good day for democracy”

I laughed and nearly fell off my chair when I read that. Seriously though, don’t feed the troll.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  DH
18, November 2011 1:38 pm

So DH thinks that anyone who does not subscribe to the standard Ventnor Blog anti-council pro-high public spending line is a troll and so presumably not welcome on here.

DH
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 3:10 pm

No, I’m not anti council. I just find your comment of Tory vs. UKIP as an example of democracy in action very funny.

You’re very welcome on VB, glad to have you on here.

hammerjammer
18, November 2011 10:47 am

This goes to show that the Tories can get away with absolutely anything on the Island and still win an election. Any hopes that the people of the Island will kick this useless shambles out went up in flames with this huge victory. It doesn’t matter that they lose a high court judgement costing us bucket loads of money, then say that they are disappointed that they… Read more »

Wight Essence
18, November 2011 11:10 am

After the high court judgement, it looks as if Pugh is trying to take a few crumbs of comfort from a by-election which was meaningless and without a proper challenge.

Asite2c
18, November 2011 12:12 pm

If Pugh thinks this result is a great victory then he is deluding himself and it just shows how stupid and out of touch with reality he really is. The Tories were always going to win this seat without a proper challenge and the 524 majority would have most likely been natural Tory voters. With very little opposition, I very much doubt whether those who are opposed… Read more »

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Asite2c
18, November 2011 1:40 pm

“A credible independent candidate” – an oxymoron if ever there was one!

Asite2c
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:07 pm

A oxymoron if there ever was one? And you accuse me of using abuse? Typical Tory hypocrisy.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Asite2c
18, November 2011 2:13 pm

Calm down dear!

Asite2c
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:20 pm

Acting like Cameron by saying “Calm down dear” is not only patronising but pathetic. It’s old and a saying which is not even funny.

Stuart Hutchinson
18, November 2011 1:20 pm

I’m pleased to see these lively comments on Ventnor Blog. I can tell you that I really would have preferred to fight an election against more effective opposition, it adds spark to any campaign and makes a win more worthwhile. Not that I’m not grateful for the support of so many residents in West Wight ward, I am, and thank you to any reading this that had… Read more »

hammerjammer
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
18, November 2011 1:37 pm

Stuart, although I am not of your political persuasion congratulations on your win. With the dreadful mistake made by your colleagues over the disabled cut to funding which got a block vote from the Tory’s on the council can you say whether or not you will also join the block vote brigade, or will you oppose cuts like these to the most vulnerable in our society? I… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
18, November 2011 2:14 pm

well done on being the only viable candidate ( and shame on the others )…Now we have your own words on the fact that you will represent your constituents over the rulings of the council…lets see how you vote

Martin william Wareham
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
18, November 2011 5:13 pm

Congratulations Stuart you can now go and join the Flock

Ryde Queen
18, November 2011 1:43 pm

Congratulations. But be fair, you did only persuade less than one in four residents to vote for you. This means 75% of locals did not want you, nor your County Hall pals.

Sadly I feel you will indeed become another Pugh yes-man once sworn in.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Ryde Queen
18, November 2011 1:47 pm

What you mean is that less than 7% of the electors were prepared to vote against the current council administration.

hammerjammer
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 1:53 pm

Please explain how this 7% figure works, cos I have no idea. Thank you

No.5
Reply to  hammerjammer
18, November 2011 1:59 pm

I think its obvious..like all tories, hasn’t got a clue.

Over 100 people chose to vote for a man who had stood down on charges of fraud (?) I think that says a lot about the options available.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  hammerjammer
18, November 2011 2:20 pm

194 people voted for candidates other than the Conservative. That is about 7% of the electors.
Kevin (aka No 5)- I appreciate that as a socialist you are not very good with figures!

hammerjammer
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:27 pm

What about the 75% that didn’t vote in the by election? Are you suggesting that each of those are in favour of the Council? IF the 7% that you fanfare was a real reflection of the vote then Stuart WOULD have received 93% of the elegible voters which he did not. Not really sure why you have to engage in purile name calling, it seems you need… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:54 pm

I appreciate that as a Tory your not much good judging people

john
Reply to  Ryde Queen
18, November 2011 10:37 pm

using your logic an even higher percentage of residents didn’t want the Lib Dems or UKIP?

Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:23 pm

Asite2C @2.20 – left your sense of humour at home today have you?

Asite2c
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:35 pm

Not at all. I’ve been having a good laugh at some of your comments. I just think Michael Winner’s saying on an advert “Calm down dear” is now old and has never been very funny. Perhaps this is the type of childish and pathetic humour sad Tories think is humorous, including Camerom.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Asite2c
18, November 2011 2:39 pm

Very pleased that I have managed to cheer you up on what otherwise would have been a depressing day for you old chap.

Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:33 pm

Hammerjammer @2.27. I did not say that the 75% non-voters were all in favour of the Council although undoubtedly some are but were unable to get out to vote yesterday. The point I am making is that only about 7% of the voters were prepared to get off their backsides and go and vote for non-Conservative candidates. Accordingly there is no evidence of a huge public feeling… Read more »

hammerjammer
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
18, November 2011 2:46 pm

Your statement was totally misleading, the staement was that only 7% were against the council. You fail to point out that less than 20% of those eligible voted for the Conservative candidate, which if I were to use your logic would not be considered a ringing endorsement for your party. But hey why let the truth get in the way eh.

No.5
Reply to  hammerjammer
18, November 2011 2:56 pm

Tories – Logic – truth – and – petard…lets see if we can get a statement out of that :)

No.5
Reply to  No.5
18, November 2011 3:09 pm

Isle of Wight Council – West Wight: C 640, Lib Dem 116, Ukip 78. (June 2009 – Ind 719, C 624). C gain from Ind

so 16 more people voted Tory this time…great

daniel clarke
Reply to  No.5
18, November 2011 4:46 pm

Why can’t you just accept the people’s wish of this ward, you socialist idiot.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
18, November 2011 7:22 pm

well theres an assumption….I hope he does really well for his ward and rejects this council and its illegal policies..

and its not the peoples wish…its those that bothered to votes wish…I whole heartedly condemn the lack of opposition…the turnout was 28%…make voting compulsory and lets see some real results.

Poll-pundit
18, November 2011 3:27 pm

In the past this ward has had an over 70% turn out. I wonder what or who, kept them all away this time?

daniel clarke
18, November 2011 3:57 pm

“There we go, it’s all Labours fault. It was the bankers that brought about the 2008 credit crunch. Would you say that it is the Tory’s fault for the desperate state we are in now, or is it a eurozone crisis? Just like your Government, I am sure you will say it’s will be someone else’s fault” This is total nonsense. Of course the bankers caused part… Read more »

hammerjammer
Reply to  daniel clarke
18, November 2011 4:20 pm

Daniel, you state that what I said was total nonesense, then you agree that the bankers created part of the problem. So perhaps it wasn’t total nonesense. Yes Labour did try to stimulate the economy post 2008, and that brought about growth for the 4 periods leading up to the election. Since the election we have seen no growth, big rises in unemployment, massive cuts to services… Read more »

daniel clarke
Reply to  hammerjammer
18, November 2011 4:45 pm

Britain had the longest recession since world war two and had a Greek style deficit. It’s total rubbish to say that there was a golden inheritance to the coalition in terms of the economy. But there was a golden inheritance in the economy in 1997 from the Conservatives to Labour.

No.5
Reply to  daniel clarke
18, November 2011 7:18 pm

all just a hash job again Daniel…our deficit is know where near Greeces, thats just media scare tactics that have sucked you in,

daniel clarke
18, November 2011 3:59 pm

Socialists on this site need to just for once respect the verdict of West Wight residents.

Poll-pundit
Reply to  daniel clarke
18, November 2011 4:02 pm

I think it more appropriate to respect the Tory party and its supporters who banged on doors and got their people out. No-one else much bothered.

daniel clarke
Reply to  Poll-pundit
18, November 2011 4:06 pm

Totally agree

Asite2c
Reply to  daniel clarke
18, November 2011 4:37 pm

Why do you assume people who write comments against Tory policies on VB are all socialists when thay could be green, liberal, communist, independent, nationalist or have no political leaning whatsoever. I would like a Tory to tell me when things were good in this country under a Tory government. Heath, Thatcher, Major and now Cameron have all messed up the economy, made people poorer while making… Read more »

Wight Essence
Reply to  daniel clarke
18, November 2011 7:32 pm

With all these (so called) socialists commenting on VB, the Isle of Wight must be turning red. I hope you’re not suffering from the paranoiac syndrome, reds under the beds?

playingthenumbers
18, November 2011 4:28 pm

Not the first to congratulate you Mr Hutchinson, but maybe the first to thank you. Thank you for putting your name & reputation on the line and accepting the terrible responsibility of administration, especially when so many of your colleagues are failing miserably, leaving only a legacy of destruction and heartache. I’m sure Mr Hutchinson you don’t need me to remind you your responsibility lies not only… Read more »

hammerjammer
18, November 2011 4:52 pm

Ah, and here comes the Greek debt red herring. We were not in the same situation as Greece due to the size of our economy. Yet again a daily mail style headline which has no reality when scrutinized.

daniel clarke
Reply to  hammerjammer
18, November 2011 5:22 pm

Not just Greece. Now it is Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy (next biggest economy after ours)and America being downgraded.

rea
18, November 2011 5:19 pm

Congrats to Stuart Hutchinson, he seems to be a decent bloke.

As for those of you who have been hurling petty insults at each other, Father Christmas will definitely NOT be coming down your chimneys this year!

Wight Essence
18, November 2011 5:37 pm

Vote Tory or Ultra Tory? Not much of a choice really and no wonder many people decided to stay at home. Congratulations to Stuart Hutchinson although I hope he will vote with his heart at County Hall and not simply take the party line.

Instead of celebrating a victory, perhaps the Tories would be wise to put the champagne on ice until the next local election.

playingthenumbers
18, November 2011 6:53 pm

Those commenting on national economic policy might like to think that it is delusional & ignorant to think that any UK government has had anything other than diminishing control over our macro-economic policy since before the Great War. All economies are cyclical; booms are caused by investment in new technology and mass consumption and busts come when there is overproduction, forcing companies to massively discount, or when… Read more »

Frank Analyst
18, November 2011 7:16 pm

An interesting article, (not exactly a comment is it PTN?) I agree about venture capitalists. The apparent value of a business bought by these people, seems not to reflect its real world profitability. Boots is a good example, but it’s happened in many other industries. The man who bought EMI, recently lost it. He, his bankers and big fee earning city advisor’s had spectacularly over-valued the firm,… Read more »

PAUL MULLERY
Reply to  Frank Analyst
18, November 2011 8:50 pm

Spot on PTN and Frank Analyst. It is the case that certain speculators targetted businesses by borrowing money to obtain sufficient shares for a controlling interest. They then used the company’s own profits to pay back the loan money. In effect the company bought itself out. The problem was that some businesses were bought out in this way just as their profits were dipping and the speculators… Read more »

playingthenumbers
Reply to  Frank Analyst
18, November 2011 9:26 pm

Frank, I’m acutely aware how deep we are all in it. The problem is the leadership shown in such crisis. It is all very well for an individual to demonstrate a little self-interest, encouraged even, like saving for a pension. But the rule needs to be adjusted for governance. Little things like equality of opportunity for all need to be considered. That is why a politician’s 1st… Read more »

hammerjammer
18, November 2011 9:04 pm

Reds under the bed, now I like that cheers. I notice that Daniel refuses to talk about illegality of this Tory council, and the huge financial burden it places on us as council tax payers. Also the fact that the cut was aimed at the most needy in our community which in my opinion is a disgrace. You mention these economies but neglect to mention that they… Read more »

no name
18, November 2011 11:17 pm

the majority of people who bothered to vote voted for Stuart. End of. no-one can say how the people who did not vote would have voted. Apathy is how the tories win. as for the questionable activities of the council, that has nothing to do with this bloke yet, and hopefully never will. Perhaps all the gloating tories and bitter others can now agree to disagree and… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  no name
19, November 2011 2:49 am

agreed.. lets wait and see how ‘representative’ Stuart will be. I’m an optimist

vanessa churchman
19, November 2011 11:22 am

I have spent an absorbing 20 mins. reading the comments above. What brains we have on this Island, why don’t some of you run for Council, preferably as Independents but then I would say that wouldn’t I? Al-Fayad bought Harrods with Harrods’ money and that seems to be where the rot set in. I remember Tiny Rowland fought for years to try and get that deal overturned.… Read more »

geordieofwight
Reply to  vanessa churchman
20, November 2011 11:49 am

There are three possible reasons these people will not stand for election. One they are too young to vote: two they are in prison or have been certified as insane: or three thay are too cowardly to put their names forward. I leave you to judge which applies. Incidentally the same can be applied to Mr Starke who complains about everything but did not take the chance… Read more »

Stuart Hutchinson
19, November 2011 3:34 pm

Love the comments, both for and against. What keeps democracy alive is people being unafraid to put their point of view, and as long as we all accept that not everyone has the same political view, and that some are a bit extreme both to the right and the left, but we accept that too, then we have a healthy debate. It is of course always easier… Read more »

Wight Essence
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
19, November 2011 4:55 pm

I’m pleased to know Stuart you are not a yes man and will make your own mind up when voting on local issues although I would like to know how you feel about some of the decisions many people are angry about such as cuts to public toilets, libraries, social care etc and the selling off of assets such as the Botanical Gardens. It would also be… Read more »

bembridge resident
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
19, November 2011 4:57 pm

A well written piece Stuart, were you wearing your rose tinted glasses? You probably will not be writing on here again as you will not be allowed to, you obviously have not had an induction yet. We used to get Edward and Roger replying but no longer. This administration believes it should not answer to anyone. Just to put you right on one fact in your piece,… Read more »

Frank Analyst
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
20, November 2011 10:55 am

Stuart – I think you will find that the first rule your chums at County Hall will impose, is that you can’t make any public pronouncements, without the press office boys clearing it first. So yes, even if you didn’t know it – this was the last we’ll here from you. Unless as a non yes-man, you would like to ask David why we spend so much… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
20, November 2011 1:44 pm

Sorry Stuart …”so I wonder how one ever knows what policies they stand for – with no financial disciplines to follow do they just pick and choose the popular ones?” (re independents)

You have just joined a Council that has no financial discipline at all

playingthenumbers
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
21, November 2011 12:48 am

Golly Stuart, less than 48hrs into the job & apologising for future mistakes already. Is this a sign of the longed-for new politics, or did your colleagues advise you just to get it in early so as to save the trouble of bothering later? You’ve got to love the efficiency drives that characterize the council. Odd you should chose between education & roads as your first existential… Read more »

hammerjammer
19, November 2011 4:21 pm

Stuart, that is a well presented piece and I hope you do retain your sense of right and wrong.
On the reduction of waste would you agree that the high court costs that were incurred over the illegal disablities cuts were a dreadful waste of our money.

Asite2c
20, November 2011 9:41 am

I can never understand how anybody can vote for the Tories unless they are more concerned about themselves than poverty, the future of the health service, the economy, cuts to public services, unfairness, the fear of losing their homes, high energy costs, redundancy, welfare benefit cuts, failing the elderly and vulnerable, increasing crime, privatisation, inequality, making the rich richer and corruption in high places. Every time the… Read more »

daniel clarke
Reply to  Asite2c
20, November 2011 4:24 pm

It is because there is no money left! I can never understand why labour get in, as they always seem to bankrupt the country. They did it in the 1970s and they have done it now!

Wight Essence
Reply to  daniel clarke
20, November 2011 4:55 pm

There is no money left because much of it was used to bail out the banks. If this money was still available, then the deficit would be much lower.

You can blame Labour, Europe or whoever you like, but it was the greedy bankers who got the UK, US and the rest of Europe into this economic mess.

daniel clarke
Reply to  Wight Essence
20, November 2011 5:38 pm

Not just the bankers. There was a 40 billion blackhole before the recession and huge unfunded fiscal stimulus. This is a fact. Get over it and move on.

Wight Essence
Reply to  daniel clarke
20, November 2011 7:41 pm

So according to your figures, 100 billion was squandered by the bankers and the Labour government created a 40 billion deficit. This is not a huge amount in government terms, was no more than the deficit of previous Tory governments and was not the cause of the recession, so I rest my case.

No.5
Reply to  daniel clarke
21, November 2011 1:15 am

Oh dear…those blue blinkers again…Tories have alway borrowed as much as Labour…we have been in deficit for 60 years…it took a banking disaster for it to be highlighted….and you blinkered bluebloods forget that for the three month before the election the country was out of recession on Labour policy when the rest of the world was crumbling and now under a Tory adminsitration we have joined the… Read more »

Frank Analyst
20, November 2011 10:44 am

Just as every Labour government since time began, borrowed far more than we can afford to repay and left all unreformed public services under greater threat?

Tony kept us out of the euro. We can thank him for that, but he was a terrible war-monger, and his public spending was hopelessly out of kilter, except for the first two years.

Asite2c
Reply to  Frank Analyst
20, November 2011 11:51 am

Sadly there is hardly a fag paper between the major parties these days which leaves only one side of the political spectrum (right) to vote for.

This is probably why the public are losing interest in politics and this shows at the ballot boxes with low turnouts in local and general elections.

Martin william Wareham
20, November 2011 9:51 pm

Stuart Hutchinson. Stuart I’m in favour of the Wellow Thorley application for wind Turbines have you an opinion you would like to share with Ventnorblog on this planning application in your ward.

Another West Wight resident
Reply to  Martin william Wareham
21, November 2011 3:05 pm

Nobby – here is your answer http://www.iwradio.co.uk/news/iw-radio-news/new-councillor-against-wind-turbines-3091/ Stuart is far more in line with the thinking of the majority of his electorate than you and your missus ever were. Wind turbines are an expensive con and the sooner our rulers wake up to this fact the better. The Duke of Edinburgh was spot on with his comments at the weekend http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2011/11/21/wind-farms-says-the-duke-of-edinburgh-are-absolutely-useless-and-a-disgrace-thank-heavens-for-the-duke-i-say/ and also here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/prince-philip/8901985/Wind-farms-are-useless-says-Prince-Philip.html See also… Read more »

Martin william Wareham
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
21, November 2011 5:06 pm

WELL Another West Wight Resident there’s no need to get offensive and grumpy I ONLY ASKED.Stuart thank you for your reply.

No.5
Reply to  Another West Wight resident
21, November 2011 7:43 pm

hmmm…and Prince Phillip is such a renowned speaker….more a standing joke.

You NIMBYS do think highly of yourselves

Stuart Hutchinson
21, November 2011 4:00 pm

Hi Bloggers, I wish I had the time to reply to all who have posed specific questions, but I’m already finding plenty of issues raised directly by my own constituents. I won’t apologise for or comment upon specific decisions taken before I even thought of standing. I can only suggest that those who have issues with the way the council has done things in the past raise… Read more »

Asite2c
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
21, November 2011 8:32 pm

I don’t think people commenting on VB are asking you to apologise for council decisions you had nothing to do with. Just your opinions about the their failures, waste of council tax payers money, arrogance and Pugh’s inept leadership qualities over the last 6 years.

Arnold Tate
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
21, November 2011 9:50 pm

Reading your first comments I thought you put yourself across well, in a balanced way, and I was impressed with your claims to want to represent the views of your constituents. Now here we are a few days later and already your mask is slipping. One of the first things we actually learn about you, beyond platitudes, is that you are against wind turbines. I know of… Read more »

Asite2c
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
22, November 2011 8:14 am

“I can only suggest that those who have issues with the way the council has done things in the past raise them directly with your own Councillor”. I’m sure many VB readers have already raised their concerns with their own councillors although there is very little the opposition can do. In my view, Conservative councillors just ignore islanders concerns, turn a blind eye and follow the leadership… Read more »

Mr J
21, November 2011 6:30 pm

You do realise you have now ruled yourself out of ever sitting on planning?

Your chance to represent your view and the feelings of the majority – in my humble opinion, is now lost, just because you ‘spoke too soon.’

Stuart Hutchinson
22, November 2011 11:14 am

I will always do my best to articulate and to represent the views of my constituents on renewable energy as well as other issues. The overwhelming majority view on the Turbines in West Wight is very clear. Most of those attending the public presentation by Infinergy at Yarmouth were against (and this exhibition deliberately ignored some key facts, later corrected); almost all attending Infinergy’s exhibition at Wellow… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
22, November 2011 11:53 am

I completely agree Stuart…this is the view of the several hundred misinformed and THWART (directors of proposed BioMAss powersation)misled constituants

Asite2c
Reply to  Stuart Hutchinson
22, November 2011 11:57 am

I’m pleased to read you will be representing the views of your constituents Stuart. It’s just a great shame the majority of councillors and MP’s in England have become undemocratic and don’t represent the majority views of their constituents, but simply follow the party line. It would still be very interesting to know your views about the question I wrote above regarding the failures, waste of council… Read more »