County Hall:

Council announce their budget plans for coming years

The Isle of Wight have this afternoon released their budget papers for 2015/16.

Leader of the council, Cllr Jonathan Bacon, explained earlier today the savings of £14.5m in the coming year were being “used in the best possible way to minimise pain”.

The focus for the council will be to use the budget to protect their four main priority areas:

  • Supporting growth in the economy, making the Island a better place and keeping it safe
  • Keeping children safe and improving their education
  • Protecting the most vulnerable with health and social care, investing in support prevention and continuing care
  • Ensuring that all the resources available to the Island are used in the most effective way in achieving the Island’s priorities.

As the council strive to make savings, £14.5m in the coming year and further £8.5m in 2016/17 they plan to work with the community to take on other services.

The role of town and parish councils
An emphasis on town and parish councils taking more responsibility for funding services their residents have direct benefit of, is being made within the latest budget proposals.

Deputy leader, Cllr Steve Stubbings, has spent time speaking the town and parish councils and said he’d received mixed reactions from them.

Some, he said, had their heads buried in the sand, others were embracing the opportunity to create a closer relationship with their residents.

It was not the job of the town and parish councils to keep precepts low, if it had an impact on the welfare of the residents, he said.

£2m contingency from Reserves
The budget papers (embedded below for your convenience) reveal where the council plans to make savings as well as ideas for increasing income such as introducing charging for foot passengers on the Cowes Floating Bridge and the development of a Business Centre.

Managing Director of the council, Dave Burbage, said it would be a stretch to make all the savings needed in the 2015/16 budget, so £2m was being taken from Reserves and Balances as a contingency figure should there be some slippage in certain areas.

Pump priming community services
Money could be spent to pump prime initiatives that will help services become more sustainable, such as community bus services.

Support would be given to town and parish councils to take over some of the services that are currently funded by the local authority but of benefit to local residents.

Council Tax increase
Last year the Labour Group proposed a 1.99% increase which was then accepted by the majority.

The administration propose to increase the council tax again by 1.99% this year.

If they don’t, they’ll have to find further savings elsewhere of £555,000 due to the Government’s council tax freeze proposals.

Cowes Floating Bridge
Following the consultation carried out last year, the council propose to introduce foot passenger fares for the Cowes Floating Bridge.

Ticket machines on each side of the River Medina will issue return tickets for 70p or 40p is paying by Smartcard. Under 18s and those with a free bus pass will not be charged.

School crossing patrols
Although the council aim to cease funding the school crossing patrols, they will not cut the service unless someone else takes over the funding of it.

Schools are being approached to include the cost in their budgets and there’s also an opportunity for businesses to sponsor the school crossing patrols.

Community toilet scheme
The council still plan to close several toilets across the Island to make budget savings, but aim to ensure that more toilets are actually available for residents and visitors through the Community Toilet Scheme.

Several organisations have already expressed an interest in taking part in the scheme.

Community bus services
Still on the list for possible savings are community bus services.

Although the council have decided to not make any changes for the disabled residents’ passes, they will be withdrawing the funding for community bus services and looking towards others to take on the running costs for those routes.

The council say they will help facilitate transferring the service to new providers with pump priming and other support.

“It’ll help flush out the services that are realistic to run,” said Cllr Stubbings.

Cuts to other bus services
Subsidised bus services will also be the target of budget savings.

Bus services the local operator deems as uneconomic for it to run without the council subsidy will no longer receive funding from the council.

Click on full screen icon to see larger version



Article edits
£85.m amended to £8.5m
Amended council tax reference, adding that last year it was proposed by Labour Group and accepted by the majority.

Image: Simon Haytack under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
44 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mat
2, February 2015 4:19 pm

Protecting our local democracy and the future of our Council should be a priority. It is important that the Local Authority and its representatives, should work hard to reinstate rightful funding for the island from the Government grant. Other strategic investment funding to develop the local economy and growth is important Ferries remain an issue. Housing and roads must be brought back into public control. All transport… Read more »

Vix Lowthion
2, February 2015 4:34 pm

Council tax continues to rise and parish precepts also will rise. I would accept this if we received an enhanced or even a constant service. Yet we are set to lose all but the most statutory services. Volunteers will be asked to fill in the gaps. Services now free – such as the floating bridge on foot – we will have to pay for. Austerity isn’t working.… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
2, February 2015 4:40 pm

Even Tory Councils don’t generally target the contractual maternity pay of their staff (page B45 of the Executive agenda)…….and all for £60k. Nasty one, Con-dependents.

steve s
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
2, February 2015 4:48 pm

Not so, Vix.
The point of increasing Town and Parish precepts is to protect those discretionary services the Isle of Wight Council can no longer afford.

I certainly wouldn’t disagree with you about the Government’s austerity policy, though. It’s not working for the Isle of Wight.

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  steve s
2, February 2015 5:10 pm

I know why the precepts are having to rise. The overall cost to the island resident is increasing and the service is decreasing. It’s convenient for national government to do this, as local councils then get the brunt of attacks. Often unfairly. Many residents don’t see the link between the national government they vote in and the policies which result in cuts like these. And this is… Read more »

Michael G
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
2, February 2015 7:09 pm

Where do you suggest the Isle of Wight council get the extra money from to pay for services that town and parish councils may (and residents) now have to bear?

If the Gov are giving them less money they have to cut funding to the non statutory things they currently fund.

stephen
2, February 2015 4:53 pm

Could someone provide a list of Statutory Services and the level of provision within those services to keep them legal.

Trading Standards and Planning/Development control come to mind.

Think back to the Library service cuts.

Cynic
Reply to  stephen
2, February 2015 8:00 pm

Oh yes Library Service cuts! Remember when a certain person (now gone Thank the Lord) claimed to a Select Committee that demand was falling when independent figures for our local library showed it was increasing? Looks like the same process happening with school places now.

Victor Meldrew
2, February 2015 5:15 pm

There are 2 lists.Iwas surprised at the number. I dont pretend to understand them all.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-local-government-statutory-duties-summary-of-responses–2

stephen
Reply to  Victor Meldrew
2, February 2015 7:07 pm

The second list emerging from this link seems to show 220 statutory duties plus wording about powers and duties. Perhaps a power is discretionary whilst a duty is an obligation.

Also no clear benchmarks within this link to establish whether a local authority is fully meeting its duties.
Court case to decide? Can Local Government apply for legal aid?

Steephill Jack
2, February 2015 5:22 pm

This government has been using the financial crisis to reduce funding for local government to the minimum statutory services.
,That’s Tory policy:keep taxes down reduce government provision and let the private sector provide. If you want it, pay for it !
There’s an election coming up, so things could change.

retired Hack
2, February 2015 5:49 pm

Withdrawal of bus subsidies is going to be a huge challenge for local communities, and the town and parish councils which represent them and may now be expected to fill the gap. The option of directly subsidising Southern Vectis services faces the immediate hurdle of SV’s refusal to open their books, so people can make a judgement on which services are “economically viable” and which aren’t, rather… Read more »

steve s
Reply to  retired Hack
2, February 2015 6:01 pm

Indeed, RH.
This is being looked into as a completely separate issue from the community bus schemes for the very reasons you highlight above.

retired Hack
Reply to  steve s
2, February 2015 6:21 pm

Thanks Steve.

The Sciolist
2, February 2015 6:04 pm

I think some radical new bus operators are long overdue on the Island. The present system does work and it’s expensive for taxpayers. Rural bus services, created and run by local communities, using smaller more fuel efficient buses could be the future but does the will exist to make it actually happen? People need to stop believing the state (or the council) can solve all of their… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  The Sciolist
2, February 2015 10:13 pm

So long as our state & our councils can take our taxes, it’s reasonable to believe that society means that our money should fund our services before being given away to solve the ‘problems’ of selfish, greedy, tax-avoiding big businesses, failed bankers, & other friends/masters of our politicians.

Black Dog
2, February 2015 6:14 pm

Really disappointing to see that the DMO continue to receive funds. This organisation should be self funding by now and funds should be withdrawn. The savings could de better deployed on essential services.

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  Black Dog
2, February 2015 10:25 pm

Look forward to the next year’s figures and you will see this is happening (this being in accordance with the original agreement).

Black Dog
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
2, February 2015 10:34 pm

Thank you Councilor Bacon. I did look ahead it is just a shame that the council did not start it this year.

Perhaps you could advise of the total sum involved as it was widely reported the funding equated to approximately £500K I may have missed the other funding stream in the budget

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  Black Dog
3, February 2015 9:53 am

£340,000

Black Dog
Reply to  Black Dog
3, February 2015 10:50 pm

Councillor Bacon was there another £200K going to them from some sort of bus fund? Making up the £500K+?

Black Dog
Reply to  Black Dog
3, February 2015 11:04 pm

@Councillor Bacon
Just looked this up on OTW and the ex leader made reference to £500, 000+ -“There’s a lot of money going in there (£374,000pa), as well as the LSTF (Local Sustainable Transport Funding)”

With that in mind can you please confirm just how much of our money will the DMO get in the coming year (years)?

dennisthegrockle
2, February 2015 6:35 pm

We love the Island and visit as often as we can. Toilets being closed are a major issue especially when we have 92 year old granny with us! Austerity is not working and we seem to be almost going back to conditions after the war. It is the same where we live on the mainland and libraries, toilets and so many services are being cut or withdrawn.… Read more »

Dalek
2, February 2015 6:55 pm

Will we have access to the toilets in County Hall as part of the Community Toilet Scheme? No, I didn’t think so.

steve s
Reply to  Dalek
2, February 2015 7:03 pm

Derek,
actually, yes!

steve s
Reply to  Dalek
2, February 2015 7:04 pm

Sorry, Dalek. I called you Derek. :-$

walker
2, February 2015 7:23 pm

Instead of the capped (without referendum) 1.99% increase each year, therefore forgoing the (1%?) central funding increase for a local freeze, if the council were (or had been) brave enough to have a refurendum on a (say)5% increase for one year at the front end, and then frozen, then there could be more central funding and protection of services… or have I missed something?

steve s
2, February 2015 7:27 pm

No, Walker, that’s a perfectly valid point.
The fact that no council has yet been bold enough to go to a referendum gives you a clear idea about the perceived potential viability of such a move. Indeed, our own budget consultation responses indicate that it would not have been acceptable to the public here.

walker
Reply to  steve s
2, February 2015 7:49 pm

Thanks for the prompt response. I would argue that the taxpayers/electorate has the acumen to see the merits. Isn’t strong political leadership about informing and guiding the public, to obtain their confidence in such matters? With respect to passing services to parish and town councils, is this not just an inefficient work-around with duplication and lack of efficiencies of scale, for many services. Without aggregation of localities… Read more »

steve s
Reply to  walker
2, February 2015 8:15 pm

Yes, Walker, I think it is. I suspect, however, that we might be in a minority and you know how referenda work.

derek
Reply to  steve s
2, February 2015 9:36 pm

Steve Stubbings, Can you make things clear about School Crossing Patrols are they been kept?

derek
Reply to  derek
2, February 2015 10:33 pm

Jonathan Bacon, Can you answer this on SCP’s?

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  derek
3, February 2015 9:57 am

School crossing patrols will remain but primarily delivered directly by schools. If for any reason in any area that cannot occur they will be provided by other means.

Colin
Reply to  derek
3, February 2015 10:16 am

@ jonathan
quote “School crossing patrols will remain but primarily delivered directly by schools. If for any reason in any area that cannot occur they will be provided by other means.”

Go on then. Keep us in the loop. What are the other means?

RTUC
Reply to  derek
3, February 2015 1:25 pm

OTW, Simon and Sal, in the Agenda Paper Shown at B.47 then Appedix I B-42 Jonathan Bacon’s comment is not made clear in the Paper.About SCP’s

RTUC
Reply to  derek
3, February 2015 1:48 pm

What Jonathan Bacon has said is not consistant with the Paper above and it’s Appendix.

CB500
3, February 2015 7:49 am

Steve Stubbings. Why no mention of the £100000 a year subsidy for Ventnor harbour? Do we really need to help out the fishermen ( who pull free stuff from the sea with little enough overhead ) and the boatbuilder who has already done pretty well out of the council?

Colin
3, February 2015 9:36 am

As a regular user of both public toilets and those already available in stores, I would suggest that the council stop and have a proper rethink about exactly what they are proposing on this subject. I would suggest that all the public toilets are used regularly by some of us who venture out from our houses. I also look at the huge number of tourists who spend… Read more »

Colin
3, February 2015 10:11 am

I don’t see any reference to the IWC vote to introduce the living wage to council employees! What a surprise! All I could find were various paragraphs reducing the staff conditions with the possibility of staff having to reapply for their own jobs.

As ever, all hot air from the councillors.

Colin
3, February 2015 10:28 am

As the councillors would appear to be reading this thread, would any of you care to inform the electorate as to which would be the five public toilets that you propose to keep open?

Will there be a ticketing system to help with the queues?

Vix Lowthion
3, February 2015 11:16 am

Community toilet proposal is so incredibly short sighted from an economic point of view. So, we sell our toilet buildings and pay a local shop £1000 per annum to use their facilities. Nothing to stop the shop in 5 years time from saying ‘we want £5000 now’. We would have no option but to agree. Buying new land for a new public toilet building would be much… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
3, February 2015 11:43 am

Last year I suggested that the IWC change the bye-laws to reflect Victorian ones that allowed a pregnant woman to relieve herself anywhere she likes, (including in a policeman’s helmet) and a man to urinate in public, as long it is against the rear offside wheel of his motor vehicle and his right hand is on the vehicle..

No councillor took up the suggestion! :-))

Food for Thought
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
3, February 2015 12:46 pm

It must be short sighted Vix it was originally mooted by David Pugh in the first round of toilet cuts. You would have thought the current council would have learnt that perhaps his ideas were not the best.

Stewart Blackmore
3, February 2015 1:40 pm

Smoke & Mirrors/Swings & Roundabouts – whatever you choose to call it it, the facts are clear. In order to try to balance the books the IW Council is drawing a line under services which it does not wish to continue supporting because, if it chose to do so, it would mean increasing the council charge by more than the (Condem government imposed) 1.99% top limit without… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined