Gurnard tree felling

Destruction of woodland by SGN also took place on someone else’s land (photos)

Protected woodland on the border of Cowes and Gurnard has been ‘absolutely obliterated’ without the consent of one of its owners.

Last week, trees and vegetation behind Princes’ Esplanade and Egypt Esplanade were torn down, causing uproar in the community.

Now, Cowes resident, Rosalind Murray, who owns the land on Egypt Esplanade up to the ‘Welcome to Gurnard sign’ has spoken of the damage done to her ground which adjoins that owned by Southern Gas Network (SGN).

Before the felling

Speaking of the devastation yesterday (Monday), Ms Murray said she has had it confirmed by SGN they went well over the boundary and the company is apologetic for what happened.

The damage is already done however, she said, as they have vandalised her property and absolutely obliterated the site.

Gurnard tree felling

Ms Murray says she does not believe there is an issue with trespass, as had been claimed,  because there was a public footpath running through her land, connecting the seafront to Battery Road.

She says the land is for everyone and she liked people using it.

Land protected by family
The land has been in Ms Murray’s family for 36 years and during that time she and her father have protected the site and the species that live on it, to prevent any building.

Gurnard tree felling

She said no money in the world could compensate for what has happened and now the land is in more danger of a landslip.

The woodland has Tree Protection Orders and is a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation.

Gurnard tree felling

SGN is believed to have consented to work on its land. It has been contacted for comment.

Council investigation
The Isle of Wight Council is investigating the works, with local councillor Paul Fuller confirming the work did not have permission.

The council’s tree officer told Cllr Fuller, a SGN estate manager said the site was cleared due to trespassing and the need to make it safe.

Result of tree felling in Gurnard

Work has since stopped but speaking on Friday, Cllr Fuller said SGN should know the status of its land and permission was needed to do the work.

He said this demonstrated how irresponsible it was.

He was fully behind any enforcement action the council may take.


This article is from the BBC’s LDRS (Local Democracy Reporter Service) scheme, which News OnTheWight is taking part in. Some alterations and additions may have been made by OnTheWight. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Highway to Hell
9, October 2018 8:54 am

Don’t we have any Architects on the island?

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  Highway to Hell
9, October 2018 10:39 am

We have asked whether any IW companies bid for the work. Will let you know what we hear back.

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  Sally Perry
10, October 2018 9:23 am

It might be some time before we can answer your question because the council replied, “We have received all of your enquiries but we won’t be able to respond quickly due to other priorities.”

Colin
Reply to  Sally Perry
10, October 2018 1:03 pm

It would have been quicker for them just to look it up rather than make excuses. I wonder what the other priorities are? Decide which biscuits to have at the next meeting? So secretive, so secretive.

davimel
Reply to  Colin
10, October 2018 5:00 pm

I suspect they are all hiding under their desks whispering,’tell them we’re busy, they might go away’

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Colin
10, October 2018 7:25 pm

Certainly secretive about the investigation and report the coroner asked for at David Green’s inquest over four years ago.

Also a bit slow to accept David George’s generous offer of a free private County Hall screening of his Wightwash film featuring them and their approach to some even more essential regeneration.

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Steve Goodman
11, October 2018 9:27 pm

Wightwash progress report; some councillors do want to see it.

Colin
9, October 2018 10:06 am

quote “The ambition is to generate economic growth with new homes”and “mixed use development” That’s all we need. More homes and more shops. Is there anywhere that the IWC won’t build? Has the council not noticed the empty shops and charity shops on the High Street? Will the harbour be an attractive place to visit with hundreds of new properties along it? The harbour is only in… Read more »

Colin
Reply to  Colin
10, October 2018 9:53 am

Mr. Seeley’s office comments were added after my posting above. Can I just say that whatever it is he, or his office are on, Can I have some, please? Pure fantasy.

davimel
9, October 2018 11:26 am

Judging from their past record I doubt this will come to much. I see the words ‘Isle of Wight council appoint architect’ and instantly feel that stomach churning dread of yet more cock-ups, incompetance and Rotten Boroughs headlines. Throw in the word ‘Masterplan’ and we are all in for a load of disruption, failed promises and eventually a ‘Miniplan’.. Been here, done that and got the T-shirt!

doughnut
9, October 2018 11:45 am

I don’t want to re-engage with the harbour, I want jobs for my children.

Tamara
9, October 2018 1:51 pm

More housing (luxury apartments) on the quayside will only benefit wealthy second-home owners and buy to let property developers, not Island families who need a starter home they can afford. Restaurants and shops will take trade away from the High Street and more businesses there will close down. I want to see attractive outdoor seating areas on the Quay to encourage people to come here and relax,… Read more »

Colin
Reply to  Tamara
9, October 2018 3:36 pm

It is not often I agree with you, Tamara, but you make some good points. The IWC fails to understand about parks and open space, prefering to to try and make money out of any opportunity instead of contributing to the well being of the population and having a pleasant area that is cared for without all the uneccessary fast food outlet et al. They didn’t like… Read more »

sculler
9, October 2018 8:06 pm

I’m rather concerned how they will achieve the beautiful azure waters. Will the dye be environmentally friendly and survive the tides.

Benny C
10, October 2018 3:04 am

To respond to Highway to Hell, you make a very valid point, so I looked at Kay Elliott’s web site. There are no architects on the island anywhere near qualified to do this as much as them. It’s niche work with many obscure but real challenges and to be fair to IOWC officers this is , for once , a well considered approach. Any architect could do… Read more »

davimel
Reply to  Benny C
10, October 2018 4:57 pm

I understand the council still support the brief for the floating bridge.. and look how THAT turned out.

iowdave
Reply to  davimel
23, October 2018 4:15 pm

Why do you always seem to post negative comments? Do you not have anything constructive to add?

davee
10, October 2018 8:32 am

Surely now is the time to build a barrage across the Medina with a lifting span and a drop down cill, with single or two lanes of road traffic across it. Single file would need a waiting area on each shore. I would suggest, just south of Stag lane across to the eastern bank, and a new road to join up with Fairlee road. From experience, most… Read more »

iowdave
10, October 2018 12:15 pm

Newport Harbour is, potentially, a wonderful opportunity for development if done sympathetically. You only have to look at Gunwharf Quays to see what can be achieved. The High Street is a disgrace and it is no wonder that shops are failing. Most of it needs a bulldozer to it and start again. I frequently get asked by visitors, “where are the shops?” where is the market?” Instead… Read more »

davimel
Reply to  iowdave
10, October 2018 4:55 pm

In what universe could moving a major retail centre 3 miles up the road be a good thing?. YOU might want town bulldozing, obviously including the Church, Museum the handfull of well preserved older buildings… have I missed anything? OR do you honestly think that the average Islander who has been using the same shopping streets for a generation, will suddenly hop onto a bus out to… Read more »

iowdave
Reply to  davimel
13, October 2018 11:54 am

I do wish you would read my comments properly. You missed out on a very important word i.e. MOST. I did not suggest that ALL of the High Street should be bulldozed. There are some architecturally pleasing buildings therein. For those who downvoted my comment I would, once again, suggest you have the backbone to support your votes. Or do you want to always live in a… Read more »

iowdave
Reply to  iowdave
22, October 2018 2:43 pm

Just as I thought. Idiots abound!

iowdave
Reply to  iowdave
23, October 2018 4:18 pm

I bet these voters do not vote at election time. Can’t be bothered to get out and do it.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined