Southampton City Council

Devolution identified by Southampton leader as critical for Solent coastal cities’ economic growth

Last updated:

A lack of devolution has been described as “the elephant in the room” in delivering economic growth in the Solent’s coastal cities.

By next year there are expected to be 18 different deals across England which give areas certain powers normally controlled by central government.

Southampton biggest city in the country not to receive devolution
Southampton City Council’s cabinet member for economic growth said Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham had highlighted to her that the Hampshire city was the biggest in the country not to receive devolution.

Councillor Sarah Bogle (Lab) said most endeavours to boost financial prosperity in the region would be “much easier” if there were devolved powers.

Bogle: Two different views are not reconcilable
Councillor Bogle said,

“I do think the elephant in the room unfortunately is devolution because there is just two different views and they are not reconcilable.

“That’s the political problem, which eventually will get resolved at some point but it’s been dragging on far too long.

“We just need to deal with it because certainly from most of the people I talk to in business and more broadly in all sectors they all basically say it’s obvious, it’s got to be around roughly the Solent or at least the coastal cities because there is a very unique set of challenges and unique set of opportunities in this part of the world.”

Central Gov no longer providing LEPs with core funding
Councillor Bogle was speaking at a Southampton City Council scrutiny committee meeting where members were discussing a report on the integration of the Solent Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) into a joint approach alongside Portsmouth City Council and Isle of Wight Council.

The committee was told central government was no longer providing the business-led LEPs with core funding from the end of the month.

The core functions, which include promoting economic growth and job creation, will be taken on by local authorities.

Engage with business leaders
The remit for the councils is to engage with business leaders and representative bodies, provide strategic economic planning and deliver government programmes.

The joint board for the three unitary authorities will consist of their respective leaders and chief executives.

Southampton will take the political lead
Portsmouth City Council will be the accountable body, while Southampton City Council will take the political lead, the committee heard.

A report said Hampshire County Council is pressing ahead on its own integration plan for the rest of the county. Councillor Bogle said they would still work together very closely.

Discussing the integration of the LEP functions, she said,

“I think what this is an opportunity to do is try out some things that could actually help us with our thinking and approaches to devolution and sort of almost set up things that might then help lead us on that road which I am sure will be littered with obstacles.”

Bogle: Skills probably the easiest area to progress
Councillor Bogle said skills was an area she hoped could see quick progress under the new arrangement.

She added,

“That is probably the area where we already have a lot of cooperation across the boundaries and probably the easiest one to progress.”

Solent Partners
Solent LEP has created an alternative company, Solent Partners, which will be a delivery partner for the local authorities.

Southampton City Council cabinet members are expected to sign off a series of recommendations to progress the integration at a meeting on Tuesday, 19th March 2024, before it comes before full council the following day.


This article is from the BBC’s LDRS (Local Democracy Reporter Service) scheme, which News OnTheWight is part of. Read here to find about more about how that scheme works on the Island. Some alterations and additions may have been made by News OnTheWight. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nitonia
9, July 2014 10:51 am

I’d like to hear more about Christ the King’s entrance conditions. Why will everyone from the West Wight be denied places?

Caconym
Reply to  Nitonia
9, July 2014 12:14 pm

I think you are confused by the wording of the article. Kids from the West Wight are no more likely to be denied a place At CtK than from anywhere else. What the article is saying is that parents who WANT their children to go to Carisbrooke will have to put CtK as their first choice (and Carisbrooke as their second) and hope to be turned down… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  Nitonia
10, July 2014 9:51 am

You have to pretend to be a God Botherer – or, given the archaic title of the school, a Fifth Monarchist.
Besides which there appears to be perfectly good cycle path along the river.

Caconym
Reply to  Mark Francis
10, July 2014 12:27 pm

Actually you have to do the complete opposite. If you live in the West Wight and want your child to attend Carisbrooke or Medina AND benefit from free bus travel then you HAVE to put CtK as your first choice, but make damn certain they reject your application. Rather than claiming to be a “God Botherer”, you need to claim you are an die-hard atheist who thinks… Read more »

Colin
9, July 2014 1:01 pm

Right, let’s see.

The Council decides to reorganise the school system so that middle school children are no longer educated locally but are required to travel longer distances to senior schools.

A couple of years later, the council doesn’t like the cost of financing their own reorganisation so try to pass the cost on to the parents.

And they wonder why criticism comes their way.

Caconym
Reply to  Colin
9, July 2014 1:46 pm

To be fair, it was the previous administration who were responsible for the school reorganisation fiasco.

Doesn’t make these proposals for free (or, rather, the lack of free) school transport any less of a mess, though!!

phil jordan
Reply to  Caconym
9, July 2014 6:10 pm

suruk the slayer: I wonder why the previous administration did not sort out the school transport issue when they decided to make wholesale changes to the school system on our Island….? Would it not have been part of the process of re-organisation to actually do that…? Cllr Whitehouse would do well to express criticism of the kafkaesque and completely bizarre actions of his conservative colleagues previous management……… Read more »

Chris Newman
Reply to  phil jordan
10, July 2014 2:40 am

But the Conservatives did sort out the buses to suit the new School 2Tier system, its the Indies that have caused the problem by removing the bus solution.

Cynic
Reply to  Chris Newman
10, July 2014 8:17 am

Mmmm! Mussolini’s claim to fame was that he “sorted out the trains!” :-)

phil jordan
Reply to  Colin
9, July 2014 6:17 pm

Colin:

I’m afraid the previous administration implemented the (failed?) re-organisation of schools on this Island.

In addition, to accompany that (now documented) failed initiative, they omitted to include implementation of a schools transport Policy to match the accompanying re-organisation.

Yet one more issue left over from the last administration to sort out….

Colin
Reply to  phil jordan
10, July 2014 9:12 am

@ phil I am well aware of which administration did what. I remember the headlines of the announcement of the £28 million contract with SV made with misplaced pride and wondered why it was such a wonderful idea to spend £4 million a year transporting the pupils to schools miles from their homes whilst closing schools on their doorsteps. And now we have the free school opening… Read more »

RJC
9, July 2014 3:17 pm

Simple solution. Move the bus stops.

Cynic
Reply to  RJC
9, July 2014 3:30 pm

,,,,and/or the bus route?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
9, July 2014 3:34 pm

e.g. Yarmouth Rd/Forest Rd/Gunville Rd/Taylor Rd?

or

Middle Rd/Gunville Rd/Taylot Rd?

Chris Newman
10, July 2014 2:30 am

This is exactly the point that I made in my entry on the objections petition. It also effects Medina College as they will lose ALL West Wight students to Carisbrooke & Christ the King. They will also lose all South Wight to the new Free School, and Sandown Academy, and all the West Cowes Students. Medina has Students starting in September 2014 from 39 Isle of Wight… Read more »

Chris Newman
10, July 2014 2:36 am

Sorry, I meant my comment to be a reply to Chris Whitehouse’s Post. :)

Mark Francis
10, July 2014 9:58 am

Actually it is probably not Kafkaesque as such – since that would imply an existential questioning of our identity & the meaning of our role within the world and a corruptible society rather than which bus to take.

Either that or waking up as an insect.

This term might however be alluding to the entrance requirements to “faith” schools.