Entire Council Support Effort To Secure ‘Assisted Area Status’ For Isle of Wight

The motion to try and secure ‘Assisted Area Status’ for the Island was supported by every Councillor present at the latest full council meeting.

The proposal was put forward by Cllr Geoff Lumley and proposed by Cllr David Pugh, with both Cllr George Brown and Cllr Vanessa Churchman eager to second it.

The adoption by Cllr Pugh
By the time the motion was reached in the agenda, Cllr Lumley had left enraged.

Cllr Pugh said, “I would like to propose Cllr’s Lumley’s motion in his absence and ask Cllr Brown to second it.”

As it is unusual for the seconder to be named, Cllr Vanessa Churchman raised a point of order, “Normally you ask for a seconder.”

“Well I did ask for a seconder,” Cllr Pugh replied.

“No, you announced the seconder. I wished to second the motion,” said Cllr Churchman.

The matter was referred to the Monitoring Officer, Davina Fiore, who said, “I don’t think it matters whether a seconder is asked for or if a seconder is already in mind.

“I really don’t think it’s an important issue.”

Finding a balance
Cllr Churchman explained that she raised the point because the motion was put forward by a Labour Councillor, proposed by a Conservative Councillor and, as an Independent Councillor, she would have liked to second the motion.

She said, “It would have given the impression that as a council we support this wholeheartedly.”

What was the motion?
Cllr Brown seconded the motion, he said: “Members may be surprised that I support what was originally Cllr Lumley’s motion.

“Should the Isle of Wight achieve ‘Assisted Area Status’, companies locating to or expanding on the Island could benefit from national or regional aid.”

An assisted area receives money from the government or EU to help create jobs and improve conditions.

The Council will do everything it can to secure the status
The meeting’s agenda read, “In the light of the continuing and longstanding economic problems of the Island, including 3,000 plus unemployed, of which 1,200 are young people, Council resolves to do everything that it can within the agreed budget and policy framework (and involving all interested parties) to secure ‘Assisted Area Status’, or similar, for the Isle of Wight.”

The reaction
Cllr Ian Stephens said: “This is very, very important to the Island.”

The motion was passed with 28 in favour, none against and none abstaining.

A representative from Ryde’s Trades Council told VB that they had arrived at the meeting and became worried about the motion once Cllr Lumley had left the meeting, they were, “amazed to observe that in his absence Councillor Leader and Tory, David Pugh, decided to move the motion himself and was supported by the entire Council!”

Image: ines saraiva under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
30 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John
5, October 2016 6:20 pm

‘save in the region of £4m per year’

Looks to me that they plan continued spending of that money, instead on not spending it, and by delaying loan repayment, increase costs by a few more percent of that… and continue higher spending (reduced saving) year on year.

Am I missing something, other than a new definition of a balanced budget?

steve stubbings
5, October 2016 6:27 pm

Yes, John. You’re missing something.
Read the Medium Term Financial Strategy for full details.

jack black
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 6:40 pm

thats a cop out just give us a precis .

Lazy
Reply to  jack black
5, October 2016 7:26 pm

So, you cant be bothered to read the published strategy – instead you want Steve to waste his time by telling you about it again?

Its not a cop out – go read the report and stop being lazy.

Mat
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 8:47 pm

Why then send a letter to Government for more money?Will IW Council get any money now, they have released this?Steve Stubbings.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Mat
5, October 2016 9:38 pm

No, they won’t and never would from this Tory Government and our useless Conservative MP

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 5:29 am

Why send letter when IW Council is planning to do this?

John
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 9:53 pm

Steve – I have now read. Have You? The £4m ‘saving’ claimed in the above press release (‘spin’?) is actually presented as £2m in the report I believe. Report para.38: “It reduces the annual amount required to be set aside over the medium term commencing with a £2.0m saving in 2016/17 and reducing to zero by 2032/33 and then subsequently increasing by circa £150,000 per annum but… Read more »

okayanyway
5, October 2016 6:29 pm

Electioneering and nothing else. They will be saying they came up with this idea, as if.

Lazy
Reply to  okayanyway
5, October 2016 7:31 pm

So who did come up with it?? This is the Independents idea. To be fair, the Tory government gave them absolutely no choice, and the Island shambles that calls itself Tory have done nothing to help apart from heckle from the sidelines, and they havnt even managed to do that properly… I suppose given that the Independents would never have had to come up with this plan… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 9:37 pm

To be accurate, I suggested a debt repayment holiday (of which this is a watered down version) some months ago at a cross-party Budget liaison meeting – one of many suggestions I have made over the last 3 years through positive engagement with this Council. The CX was nearly apoplectic at the suggestion. It is the new Finance Officer from Portsmouth who is Mr Yes to original… Read more »

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 7:00 am

Cllr Lumley, are you implying the CX and the previous Finance Officer could have done more?

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Mat
6, October 2016 9:04 am

Yes

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 9:19 am

Should IWC share Portsmouth’s CX then?Saving?

CB500
5, October 2016 7:03 pm

‘ but instead of the originally proposed figure of £12.5m the target can now be reduced to £8.5m. ‘ That £8.5m is about what we stump up to Island Roads each year isn’t it? How about pulling the plug, accepting the short term penalties and spending, say, a million a year on the roads ourselves? That would go a long way toward stopping further cuts. Or is… Read more »

Lazy
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 7:35 pm

£1million a year on the roads would get us nothing. The PFI must run its course. There have been disasters, incompetence, and even the dumping of cats eyes in hedges, but most of the roads they have done so far are a thousand times better than the dirt tracks we had before. Having said that, once the “core investment period” is finished (7 years?), we should definitely… Read more »

CB500
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 8:32 pm

£1m was a starter for debate. Island roads have been given a lot of money for little return so far. Undercliff, shoddy street lighting, cheap skim overs with slidy tarmac. Boniface road in Ventnor is already sinking again a year and a half after completion.
Just trying to be creative here.

Lazy
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 9:01 pm

Undercliff failed. Bouldner road in Yarmouth was successful. Street lighting provides less light – causing less light pollution and saving power. “cheap skim overs” are what Pughs tories did. IR have planed off the road surface and replaced it. If a road is sinking – report it. They are then obliged to do something about it – if they can. No-one can control geological activity. There are… Read more »

profoundlife
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 11:53 pm

Dammit, Lazy. I hate reasoned opinion looking at both sides of the argument. I want polemics I can shout!

CB500
Reply to  Lazy
6, October 2016 7:41 am

It’s amazing how the simple act of giving an arm of a multinational corporation a cosy local name ‘ Island Roads ‘ pulls the wool over some people’s eyes.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Lazy
6, October 2016 8:09 am

Agreed, CB500.

This is worth a look…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinci_SA#Criticism

Tarmac
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 8:11 pm

Spend £1m pa on the roads? Are you mad? That’s how they ended up in such a bad state. Also the IWC doesn’t have a proper highways dept anymore so they’d have to recruit a load of staff that moved over to Island Roads.

CB500
Reply to  Tarmac
5, October 2016 8:34 pm

I think a good look would find that the majority of the staff who moved were soon out on their ears.

tyke
5, October 2016 10:52 pm

If the council is so concerned at it’s debt levels, why did it recently decide to borrow an additional £70m to finance Amey’s profits under the waste contract?

Caconym
6, October 2016 8:11 am

#Begin Sarcasm_Mode Perhaps things will be better for the Isle of Wight under the touchy-feely, caring-sharing Theresa May? #End Sarcasm_Mode Frankly, I’m going to view May’s final address with a HUGE pinch of salt. She will have to do something really substantial to prove that the Tories are no longer the “nasty party”. She could start by sacking Jeremy Hunt. That man epitomises all that is wrong… Read more »

Jonathan
6, October 2016 8:48 am

I’d just like to say that our councillors (probably all of them) have had a horrible time dealing with austerity and the Conservative dogma that led to local Conservatives chewing their own mouths off to support their own stranglers. Shame on our MP and Conservative councillors for not caring about home while pandering to their party grandees. Thank goodness we have some people of conscience trying to… Read more »

Tim
6, October 2016 9:55 am

Still ignoring the “Elephant in the Room” then IWC?

Rod Manley
6, October 2016 12:54 pm

Is this tackling Austerity or is it really dealing with the consequences of it?

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined