Unhappy child

Ofsted names Isle of Wight as one of worst authorities for child protection

It’ll be no surprise to readers to hear that the Isle of Wight was named yesterday in Ofsted’s first Social Care Annual Report as one of the worst local authorities in the country for child protection.

The Isle of Wight joined 19 other local authorities, including Kingston upon Thames, Birmingham and Somerset who are considered by Ofsted as failing children in their care.

Inadequate rating
Following an inspection in November 2012, a damning report was released back in January 2013 which found the Isle of Wight’s child protection services to be ‘inadequate’.

Much has happened since then, with a new Children’s Improvement Board, headed by Professor Ray Jones, monitoring progress of changes instigated following the rating.

Hampshire partnership
Earlier in the year Hampshire Children’s Services took over running the Island’s child protection as well as education and a subsequent recruitment drive has attracted experienced members of staff to the team.

Speaking on the release of the report Cllr Richard Priest, cabinet member responsible for children’s services told OnTheWight,

“As far as the Isle of Wight is concerned, the rating quoted in Ofsted’s report relates to an inspection carried out in November 2012. Since then much has been done to turn around children’s social care on the Island, not least our move to enter into a strategic partnership with Hampshire County Council. This is designed to strengthen child protection and education services on the Island.

“The agreement, that became effective on 1 July, is a significant opportunity for both local authorities. We have taken a steady and considered approach to ensure all challenges, risks and solutions have been identified and I am confident that we can now move forward to strive for the very best in children’s services on the Island and, most importantly, for the children and families who deserve the very best support.”

HM chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw said:

“As it stands, there are 20 councils where the standard of child protection is unacceptably poor and judged to be inadequate.

“Incompetent and ineffective leadership must be addressed quickly. But where those in leadership positions have capacity and potential, this must be recognised and nurtured.

“Too much leadership volatility in social care is counter-productive – that goes without saying. One in three local authorities has had a change in their director of children’s services last year alone.

“The combination of unstable communities and political and managerial instability in our social care services is a dangerous mix.”

For those who wish to read the report in full, we’ve embedded it below for your convenience.

The report


Image: BFS_man under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
30 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
stig o'hara
1, February 2011 2:45 pm

Oh absolutely chuffing brilliant! One project that might have actually helped the tourist industry and encourage visitors and it gets naffing well cancelled. HELLO!! WE NEED TOURISTS. WE RELY ON THEM!! Or perhaps the Island should just become a retirement home for local government officers unable to organise a nun shoot in a Nunnery! PS What maintainance of the footpath network?? There hasn’t been much round our… Read more »

wendy
1, February 2011 3:15 pm

I’m with you stig! the one thing that brings lots of visitors is the walking festival and the walk the wight. As one who regularly does walks with dog on alot of paths, I know that most of the signs are either missing or so faint you have no idea where you’re going. hence I always take a map whit me on places I don’t know, or… Read more »

Bob Smith
1, February 2011 3:36 pm

So how much did they pay for the designs before they decided to scrap the project?

Mike
1, February 2011 4:03 pm

I think the problem was that the Rights of Way people thought this up, but didn’t tell management, so Members were not best pleased when Parish’s asked where the money was coming from amid all the cuts.

Mike
1, February 2011 4:04 pm

Apologies for my wayward apostrophe in the above!

CPRE-IW
1, February 2011 4:20 pm

Like all the other community infrastructure being ditched, the Council is probably looking for volunteers and charities to pick up the tab and carry the project through. Already the Ramblers have been replacing stiles with new kissing gates (useful for walkers who can’t climb so well) and have been asking various groups to sponsor one – CPRE has already paid for one and will have its Countryside… Read more »

cath
1, February 2011 4:25 pm

Dear Lord, do we need to moan about EVERYTHING? Tourists have been coming to the Island with the signs as they are at present for many years. I really don’t think anyone is going to cancel a holiday because the Council didn’t put up new signs this year! Maybe in a few years time we could have some new ones, when money’s less tight. Or perhaps get… Read more »

Bus Driver
Reply to  cath
1, February 2011 4:59 pm

Yes Cath but with the loss of the Tourist Info Centres, who is going to ‘point’ the tourists in the right direction?

no.5
Reply to  cath
1, February 2011 5:08 pm

Spending money on ‘tourism’ on the Island is never a bad idea as its just about the only industry left

no.5
Reply to  no.5
1, February 2011 5:09 pm

and the Council own ‘Brown’ signs have been in such a state for years it is laughable that they cancel now.

eddo
1, February 2011 5:06 pm

when getting off the bus ask the driver the way easy me thinks

Bus Driver
Reply to  eddo
2, February 2011 12:04 am

As if us bus drivers have the time to be mobile tourist info centres’! I once spent nearlly 7 minutes trying to explain to a lady how to get from Shanklin bus terminus to the sea front.

Steve & Jane
1, February 2011 5:52 pm

Cath – we do not like to moan, but are finding lots to moan about because we have been let down by local & national politicians. And we have spoken to less than impressed tourists from the mainland & abroad, mainly because cyclists passing through Newport get lost; despite the council greenwash & the development gain money set aside for it. And we are 2 of the… Read more »

hmmm
1, February 2011 6:39 pm

everyone get some white insulation tape and go out and put a symbol on their nearest sign post. The council should put a tiny amount of effort in to make some templates and allow people to go out with paint and mark the existing signs themselves. Or what about getting some kids doing community service for graffiti to go out and do something useful with their spray… Read more »

Ron
1, February 2011 11:35 pm

Signs or less Adult social care – It’s a no brainer for me. Yes, people moan about everything, just like the last lot of Lib Dems. We moaned about their waste on consultants, high pay for officers, useless councillors, high council tak rises of around 15% each year – thats why we kicked them out. They didnt even have to cope with cuts in funding from central… Read more »

Steve & Jane
Reply to  Ron
2, February 2011 11:38 pm

Ron – glad you mentioned the Labour government cuts; it reminded us that the Tories cut before them, and that since Roy Jenkins in the late 1960’s no Chancellor has bothered to balance the books.(We are aware that increased taxation was involved, but apparently nobody died). We fail to understand why all goverments since have been incapable of ensuring that we live within our means, when they… Read more »

m butcher
1, February 2011 11:48 pm

Only need four new signs,Closed.one for each of are ferry terminals

David
Reply to  m butcher
3, February 2011 6:41 pm

Erm… last time I counted there were more than 4. Ryde Hoverport, Pier, Fishbourne, East Cowes, Cowes Thetis Wharf, Cowes Pontoon, Yarmouth Pier, Yarmouth Quay. Or did you just mean car ferries – then it’s only 3 signs.
Do you seriously never want contact with the mainland?!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined