Steve Hastings

Leader of Isle of Wight Conservative councillors explains why he’s stepped down

The leader of the Conservative group of councillors at Isle of Wight council has issued a statement today explaining why he is stepping down from the role.

Cllr Steve Hastings, who is also Chairman of the Corporate Scrutiny Committee, explained that after becoming ill a few weeks ago, which he is still receiving treatment for, he has made the decision to prioritise his health..

Cllr Hastings said,

“In May, I was chosen by my colleagues to lead the Conservative Group at County Hall. I was also subsequently elected as Chair of the Council’s Corporate Scrutiny Committee.
 
“A few weeks ago, I became ill and have been on medication and receiving treatment since then. I am grateful to all fellow members of the Isle of Wight Council for their kind words of support and good wishes. My thanks also to Cllr Chris Quirk for chairing the Corporate Scrutiny Committee in my absence.”

Hastings: Need to prioritise my health over coming months
Cllr Hastings went on to say,

“Although I have begun to improve, I am still far from back to full strength. I need to prioritise my health over the coming weeks and months, in order that I have the best possible prospects of a full recovery.

“I have therefore decided to step down as leader of the Conservative Group with immediate effect.”

Hastings: Does not affect ward councillor work
Cllr Hastings added,

“This does not affect my work as the ward councillor for Brighstone, Calbourne and Shalfleet, which has always been my primary focus.

“I will also continue as chair of the Corporate Scrutiny Committee until January, when the new leadership of the Conservative Group will put forward a nomination to replace me at that month’s Full Council meeting.”

A new leader for the group will be elected on Friday 3rd December.

Our best wishes to Cllr Hastings for a speedy recovery.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
4 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John
5, October 2016 6:20 pm

‘save in the region of £4m per year’

Looks to me that they plan continued spending of that money, instead on not spending it, and by delaying loan repayment, increase costs by a few more percent of that… and continue higher spending (reduced saving) year on year.

Am I missing something, other than a new definition of a balanced budget?

steve stubbings
5, October 2016 6:27 pm

Yes, John. You’re missing something.
Read the Medium Term Financial Strategy for full details.

jack black
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 6:40 pm

thats a cop out just give us a precis .

Lazy
Reply to  jack black
5, October 2016 7:26 pm

So, you cant be bothered to read the published strategy – instead you want Steve to waste his time by telling you about it again?

Its not a cop out – go read the report and stop being lazy.

Mat
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 8:47 pm

Why then send a letter to Government for more money?Will IW Council get any money now, they have released this?Steve Stubbings.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Mat
5, October 2016 9:38 pm

No, they won’t and never would from this Tory Government and our useless Conservative MP

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 5:29 am

Why send letter when IW Council is planning to do this?

John
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 9:53 pm

Steve – I have now read. Have You? The £4m ‘saving’ claimed in the above press release (‘spin’?) is actually presented as £2m in the report I believe. Report para.38: “It reduces the annual amount required to be set aside over the medium term commencing with a £2.0m saving in 2016/17 and reducing to zero by 2032/33 and then subsequently increasing by circa £150,000 per annum but… Read more »

okayanyway
5, October 2016 6:29 pm

Electioneering and nothing else. They will be saying they came up with this idea, as if.

Lazy
Reply to  okayanyway
5, October 2016 7:31 pm

So who did come up with it?? This is the Independents idea. To be fair, the Tory government gave them absolutely no choice, and the Island shambles that calls itself Tory have done nothing to help apart from heckle from the sidelines, and they havnt even managed to do that properly… I suppose given that the Independents would never have had to come up with this plan… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 9:37 pm

To be accurate, I suggested a debt repayment holiday (of which this is a watered down version) some months ago at a cross-party Budget liaison meeting – one of many suggestions I have made over the last 3 years through positive engagement with this Council. The CX was nearly apoplectic at the suggestion. It is the new Finance Officer from Portsmouth who is Mr Yes to original… Read more »

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 7:00 am

Cllr Lumley, are you implying the CX and the previous Finance Officer could have done more?

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Mat
6, October 2016 9:04 am

Yes

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 9:19 am

Should IWC share Portsmouth’s CX then?Saving?

CB500
5, October 2016 7:03 pm

‘ but instead of the originally proposed figure of £12.5m the target can now be reduced to £8.5m. ‘ That £8.5m is about what we stump up to Island Roads each year isn’t it? How about pulling the plug, accepting the short term penalties and spending, say, a million a year on the roads ourselves? That would go a long way toward stopping further cuts. Or is… Read more »

Lazy
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 7:35 pm

£1million a year on the roads would get us nothing. The PFI must run its course. There have been disasters, incompetence, and even the dumping of cats eyes in hedges, but most of the roads they have done so far are a thousand times better than the dirt tracks we had before. Having said that, once the “core investment period” is finished (7 years?), we should definitely… Read more »

CB500
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 8:32 pm

£1m was a starter for debate. Island roads have been given a lot of money for little return so far. Undercliff, shoddy street lighting, cheap skim overs with slidy tarmac. Boniface road in Ventnor is already sinking again a year and a half after completion.
Just trying to be creative here.

Lazy
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 9:01 pm

Undercliff failed. Bouldner road in Yarmouth was successful. Street lighting provides less light – causing less light pollution and saving power. “cheap skim overs” are what Pughs tories did. IR have planed off the road surface and replaced it. If a road is sinking – report it. They are then obliged to do something about it – if they can. No-one can control geological activity. There are… Read more »

profoundlife
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 11:53 pm

Dammit, Lazy. I hate reasoned opinion looking at both sides of the argument. I want polemics I can shout!

CB500
Reply to  Lazy
6, October 2016 7:41 am

It’s amazing how the simple act of giving an arm of a multinational corporation a cosy local name ‘ Island Roads ‘ pulls the wool over some people’s eyes.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Lazy
6, October 2016 8:09 am

Agreed, CB500.

This is worth a look…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinci_SA#Criticism

Tarmac
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 8:11 pm

Spend £1m pa on the roads? Are you mad? That’s how they ended up in such a bad state. Also the IWC doesn’t have a proper highways dept anymore so they’d have to recruit a load of staff that moved over to Island Roads.

CB500
Reply to  Tarmac
5, October 2016 8:34 pm

I think a good look would find that the majority of the staff who moved were soon out on their ears.

tyke
5, October 2016 10:52 pm

If the council is so concerned at it’s debt levels, why did it recently decide to borrow an additional £70m to finance Amey’s profits under the waste contract?

Caconym
6, October 2016 8:11 am

#Begin Sarcasm_Mode Perhaps things will be better for the Isle of Wight under the touchy-feely, caring-sharing Theresa May? #End Sarcasm_Mode Frankly, I’m going to view May’s final address with a HUGE pinch of salt. She will have to do something really substantial to prove that the Tories are no longer the “nasty party”. She could start by sacking Jeremy Hunt. That man epitomises all that is wrong… Read more »

Jonathan
6, October 2016 8:48 am

I’d just like to say that our councillors (probably all of them) have had a horrible time dealing with austerity and the Conservative dogma that led to local Conservatives chewing their own mouths off to support their own stranglers. Shame on our MP and Conservative councillors for not caring about home while pandering to their party grandees. Thank goodness we have some people of conscience trying to… Read more »

Tim
6, October 2016 9:55 am

Still ignoring the “Elephant in the Room” then IWC?

Rod Manley
6, October 2016 12:54 pm

Is this tackling Austerity or is it really dealing with the consequences of it?

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined