Photo of the "disseminate hedge"

Letter: Removal of hedgerows will impact migrating birds and ultimately lead to extinction

News OnTheWight always welcomes a Letter to the Editor to share with our readers – unsurprisingly they don’t always reflect the views of this publication. If you have something you’d like to share, get in touch and of course, your considered comments are welcome below.

This from Angela Hewitt from Naturezones Wildlife Field Studies Centre. Ed


I don’t know who owns this cropped hedge along the road towards Whippingham roundabout from Newport, but I was shocked by it decimation.

For years it has been a rich source of nectar from the many flowers for bees and other insects for years it as been a nesting site for our returning migrant birds and the loss of caterpillars. But this year when they turn up their home will be gone.

This is precisely why our bird populations are facing catastrophic extinction.

A magnetic controlled memory
It has been thoroughly researched and evidenced that birds have a unique sort of magnetic controlled memory. This means that they return to the same nesting site where they were hatched every year.

If that site disappears they cannot raise any new young. They flounder, wander around in a feeble attempt to find a close by alternative, but there isn’t one. Out of the possible ten that successfully manage the treacherous journey back home, one may find somewhere, while the others just potter around, return to Africa  with no young raised and eventually they all fade away into extinction.

So when those migrant birds return to the Whippingham roundabout nesting site they will find it gone.

Profound ignorance
There is a profound ignorance amongst landowners and the various authorities regarding nature conservation and why it is so important in supporting our environment and the prevention of the progressive climate change.

It is about time they learnt that it is ALL connected.

My mission is for our future, not today’s playground
I suppose football is more important (see background), but I have not changed my mind. My mission is for our future, not today’s playground. I have absolutely nothing against football, but everyone needs to be educated about nature including, footballers. Can’t see how removal of the hedge helps football.

Clearly the ecological consultant knows nothing about bird migration.

Why have IWC approved such destruction?
Also Cllr Jonathan Bacon claims,

“Our Climate and Environment Strategy sets out our ambitions for reducing and offsetting carbon emissions.”

“Planting trees on council land is a visible indication of the actions we are taking, and a tangible sign of our commitment to our status as a UNESCO Biosphere.”

So why have the council approved such destruction?

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
old bull
20, November 2015 12:09 am

[part of comment removed by moderator]
Very sad the George let this happen. We not only good places to eat but also safe places.

Diogenese's Barrel
20, November 2015 4:26 am

How can the reasons listed by the inspectors for a zero rating be described as “Administrative errors”

They were fundamental failures of the management to operate their kitchen.

It’s very worrying, and they need more than just a re-inspection.

Caconym
20, November 2015 9:32 am

Perhaps OTW could ask The George about the points raised and ask them to explain how each of them was due to “paperwork”?

I can see how a couple of them could be down to poor recording, but that’s about it.

Mark Francis
20, November 2015 9:41 am

The question is whether or not you are likely to get food poisoning or not. All the rest of the scores on the doors schtick is of only peripheral relevance.
[part of comment removed by moderator]

davimel
20, November 2015 12:13 pm

MMMM IoWCP make yet another booboo! How can they as journalists(?) state as fact that the issue was a paperwork error when a simple bit of REAL journalism would show a little more to this than was first claimed. I doubt it was a major issue, but trying to cover up with ‘corporate speak’ and blaming an ex staff member does no favours. Just tell the truth… Read more »

Fred Karno
20, November 2015 12:26 pm

The 8th point on the inspection report says, “Ensure regular hand washing is undertaken”. Presumably the premises were picked up on this point by the Environmental Health Officer, otherwise why would the report state this? The manager in her defensive statement says, “This rating does not reflect on the general hygiene”. Excuse me, but I beg to differ. Hand washing most certainly is general hygiene and many… Read more »

Garry
20, November 2015 4:46 pm

Before moving to the island we lived in an area known as the ‘balti belt’. All those establishments somehow had FSA ratings.
I’d rather have a meal at the George with it’s current rating than any of the 4 star baltis we’ve left behind.

Diogenese's Barrel
Reply to  Garry
20, November 2015 5:08 pm

Garry this is not about comparisons with unknown (to us islanders) mock Indian food eating places in the Midlands (presumably).

It is about one of the previously well-respected eating places on the Isle of Wight which has now been shown to be incapable of even meeting basic national food hygiene requirements.

It is about a loss of credibility and confidence by diners on the island.

Garry
Reply to  Diogenese's Barrel
20, November 2015 5:34 pm

You’ve obviously missed the point of my comment and your first paragraph is, quite frankly, offensive, unnecessary and suggests a lack of knowledge of what islanders know.

Graham
Reply to  Garry
20, November 2015 7:24 pm

Garry. Unfortunately you’ve come across a small group of island elitists who see anyone who moves here as inferior. They will never agree with you, regardless of topic, purely because you were not born here. Please be assured that not all island residents are as bigotted as they are.

Mr Einsteins Ghost
20, November 2015 7:42 pm

Garry…to echo Graham’s comment, their is sadly a significant ‘insular’ section of the island. They are far from the majority, but they do have the largest voices! Welcome.

Garry
Reply to  Mr Einsteins Ghost
21, November 2015 7:54 pm

The philosopher does appear to show less intelligence than the receptacle that he lives in. Perhaps because he is too far up his own rectum and is unable to see any other point of view.

leonard
21, November 2015 8:19 pm

Having lived in various parts of the country, I think Gerry is broadly correct in his point of view. However, being from the Island, it does irritate me that people think anyone who disagrees with someone from the mainland is ‘insular’. Frankly, I dont care if someone from the mainland moves here, but I do care when people stereotype. That goes for the philosopher and the spectre… Read more »

retired Hack
Reply to  leonard
21, November 2015 9:36 pm

I agree, but it’s still a complete mystery to me as to what any of this has to do with food safety ratings. Posh hotels or balti joints, they both need regulating. And individual good experiences are of no help at all. I might just as usefully say: “I’ve smoked 40 a day for 50 years and look at me, fit as a flea. Therefore smoking is… Read more »

leonard
Reply to  retired Hack
21, November 2015 11:41 pm

of course individual experiences are important.

How often have you eaten somewhere that a friend has recommended?

and of course each individuals experience will differ.

the george and balti places are absolutely comparable. either they are doing everything correctly or they are not. the size of the establishment doesnt matter.

Caconym
Reply to  leonard
22, November 2015 1:52 pm

Personally, I have found that the most insular and parochial residents of the IW are those who have retired here from the mainland.

They want the IW to be the rural backwater they imagined for their dotage and take great exception to anything that might improve the lives of young people on the IW.

gordon
Reply to  Caconym
22, November 2015 4:10 pm

And of course, coming from outer space as you do, you would have vast experience of what mainlanders want. Don’t get out much, do you!

Caconym
Reply to  gordon
23, November 2015 7:28 am

Truth hurts, eh?

BRIAN
Reply to  Caconym
22, November 2015 4:41 pm

Actually, Suruk, I have heard those sentiments from quite a few retired people from the mainland of whom I am one but don’t hold with those views. Their attitude is that we have come here to retire, our working days are over so why should we be bothered about economic life on the Island? So long as the shops are open, we have fuel for our car… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  BRIAN
23, November 2015 7:38 am

Indeed, Brian. I have actually heard this expressed many times, maybe is is a small, but exceedingly vocal minority.

“I didn’t retire here for X to happen” is an all too familiar refrain.

I think that retirees with children and grandchildren living here know how hard it can be living and working here.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined