Racing Motorcyclis

Letter: Too many arguments against Road Races to support it

OnTheWight always welcomes a Letter to the Editor to share with our readers – unsurprisingly they don’t always reflect the views of this publication. If you have something you’d like to share, get in touch and of course, your considered comments are welcome below.

This from Brighstone Parish councillor, Nick Stuart. Ed


Having started out looking at pro and anti issues, in my view, the arguments of safety, environmental damage and disruption are simply too overwhelming to support the Isle of Wight Road Races.

I spoke at length to key people on the Isle of Man and the advice was ‘don’t touch it with a bargepole’. Their view was the economics were overrated, with a death toll in races and year round racing visitors averaging over ten a year. Which suggests life changing injuries to 100 people a year.

Even some professional motorbike racers have called the West Wight a dangerous course, and a poor advert for motor racing.

Consultation lacking
Then you look at the efforts by the organisers to bounce the Island into accepting this commercial event. Their consultation was one PR event in Brighstone, a six-week online focused consultation and a few leaflets.

While the full results, like much of their information, is secret.

“Wooly words”
When they came to answer questions from Brighstone Parish Council recently, when asked about the major problem of copycat racers the rest of the year, they gave, in my view, woolly words about education and would not commit to paying for mitigation or speed cameras.

Asked about safety, they hide behind the ACU, who, with a vested interest in the event, said it was fine.

Analysis, study or assessment
They stated they have no economic analysis, would not be able to provide risk assessment or event management plan and would not be carrying out an environmental study.

As a small group of people they clearly believe this is a fabulous idea and a chance for them to make money. You might admire the commercial enthusiasm, but I dislike their “blindness to the problems”, and especially to the views of a large majority of the affected public.

Racing is fantastic fun; but on dedicated Racing circuits
I respect the vast majority of careful courteous motorbike riders and views of friends and neighbours who support this idea. I can recognise that Racing is fantastic fun; but on dedicated Racing circuits, not narrow rural roads close to front doors.

Like many, I expect the Isle of Wight council and Secretary of State to carefully consider all the issues and then sensibly reject this plan.

Image: vikram sundaramoorthy under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
16 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Asite2c
28, February 2012 10:48 am

An excellent alternative to the rag bag of a budget which will be proposed by the Tories. Sadly, instead of supporting theses proposals which could benefit the Island, the Tory members will just tow the party line and give the Indedependents proposals short shrift, just as they do with expert advice, opposing ideas and the concerns of the Island people.

Cllr Geoff Lumley (Labour)
28, February 2012 3:00 pm

The email I have just sent to Ian Stephens: Dear Ian Just to say that I will be voting for the Independent Group’s budget alternative tomorrow evening after mine has been dispensed with by the Tories. There are a few elements of it that I don’t agree with – I doubt you can save that much with a car park permit, we don’t have the in-house capacity… Read more »

Steephill Jack
Reply to  Cllr Geoff Lumley (Labour)
28, February 2012 9:39 pm

Well said Geoff: you have done your homework too. Now is the time to free yourself from the Labour Party and become an Independent. Your majority will increase, I’m sure.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Steephill Jack
29, February 2012 6:49 am

Thanks Jack – but don’t be daft ! Have you seen the increase in my vote last time? Up 17%…..and I did that by being a man of principle. A LABOUR man.

Steephill Jack
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
29, February 2012 7:43 am

Your vote went up because you are known to be a good, reliable councillor. Without the Labour tag you would get even more votes.
Independent councillors can also be men of principle.

island wide
28, February 2012 4:21 pm

Following proposals from different parties concerning the budget I note that one news media source is stating that Leader of the Council David Pugh has said that the Independents have left it too late with their proposals. He allegedly said that although alternative proposals are welcome the lateness of the publication makes it difficult to consider them in advance of the meeting tomorrow. I wonder why the… Read more »

Asite2c
Reply to  island wide
28, February 2012 4:59 pm

Due to a lack of political education, perhaps Pugh confuses dictatorship with democracy and is unable to distinguish the two?

john
28, February 2012 8:26 pm

Sounds really good, apart from not refurbishing the toilets, in fact, too good to be true? Still, they know they’re never going to have to deliver it so they can promise the earth. However, the public will be fooled.

Chris Welsford
Reply to  john
29, February 2012 7:52 am

With only a year or so until elections, we would hardly risk making proposals that cannot be implemented. In 2013 we may have to put our money where our mouth is. We consulted carefully with finance officers and obtained the necessary guidance, which we followed. We have made sure that our proposals are deliverable and given the opportunity, we would be able to deliver them. It is… Read more »

Michael W
Reply to  Chris Welsford
29, February 2012 7:56 am

Well said Chris!

Jonathan Bacon
28, February 2012 9:02 pm

There’s no point publishing an unworkable budget. We have worked hard to create a legal balanced alternative budget – agreed as such by the relevant senior council officers – to show that things can be done better than they are at the moment.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined