Lifeboat Lotto: Find out this week’s numbers

Join up for the Island Independent Lifeboat Lotto and you could be bagging yourself the £3,500 jackpot next week.

The draw which took place this morning (13th February 2013) drew the following numbers.

Numbers: 12 – 14 – 28 – 30
With several rollovers now, this means that next week’s jackpot has risen to £3,500.

Take part in the Island Independent Lifeboat Lotto
Taking part in the Lifeboat Lotto is easy. Simply complete the entry form and choose to pay by standing order either monthly, quarterly, six monthly or yearly. Choose four numbers between 1 and 31 or opt for the lucky dip.

The draw takes place every Wednesday morning (numbers will be displayed here On The Wight) and if the draw doesn’t result in a winner the money rolls over to the next week.

Sign up now
Simply complete the entry form and choose to pay by standing order either monthly, quarterly, six monthly or yearly. Choose four numbers between 1 and 31 or opt for the lucky dip.

Download the Form to print, complete and post back to us.

If you have any queries, just get in touch with us and hopefully we’ll be able to help.

Help raise cash for the Independent Lifeboats on the Isle of Wight.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve Draper
1, February 2013 8:36 am

So Pennyfeathers!!!! – 904 more homes, great. 904 / 1808 extra unemployed, or 904 single teenage, drinking swearing Mothers with 2700 uncontrollable kids from various Fathers, maybe 904/1808 untaxed, uninsured vehicles and a probable increase in Council Tax for all of us to help pay the Benefit, Policing, Medical and Emergency Services bills. Good news for Tesco and no doubt for those who will be transferred from… Read more »

playingthenumbers
Reply to  Steve Draper
1, February 2013 4:02 pm

Oh my, where to start? The sweeping generalizations you make are completely without foundation. Cut ‘n paste jobs from tabloids, if you haven’t worked it out yet, does not constitute informed opinion. Neither does your comment address the perilous state of the economy. Determined as it is by an ageing population, who are living longer & being supported in their homes, reducing housing availability & raising prices… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  playingthenumbers
1, February 2013 4:40 pm

playingthenumbers? more like playingthebully from where I’m sitting.

One massive hole in your logic: Workfare, ie people forced to work for their benefits. Stifling growth, wealth distribution and the creation of real jobs which pay real money,cash, wonga, bread, call it what you will – if workers aren’t paid it they cant spend it.

playingthenumbers
Reply to  Bystander
1, February 2013 5:14 pm

prewitt, I’m not sure if you’ve picked up on earlier contributions I have made to OTW, but I can assure you my interpretation of workfare is that is one of the most disastrous models to get people into work ever conceived. As an intervention it allows companies to adjust business models to factor in cheap labour, reducing the purchasing power of individuals & as you quite rightly… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  playingthenumbers
1, February 2013 8:36 pm

As I said any mention of workfare was totally omitted from your OP, even though it was highly relevant to the point you were making when talking down to Steve Draper and very much part of the equation. I’m not familiar with your earlier posts, I didn’t realise I was supposed to be, I seldom make it past the first few lines as I find them long… Read more »

Steve Draper
Reply to  playingthenumbers
1, February 2013 8:48 pm

I’m not aware that you’ve actually addressed the prime issue of whether the Pennyfeathers development is viable, economically or ecologically acceptable. Your “Utopian” view, although interesting, would appear to be somewhat textbook and far from reality!! I could mention Tony Blair’s award from Poland for opening up the workplace in the UK – that’s embarrassing! I could argue that the socially inept of today and the general… Read more »

no.5
1, February 2013 9:12 am

I take it you are happy for the 20,000 children born to Island residents in the next 10 years to move in with you?

Steve Draper
Reply to  no.5
1, February 2013 1:15 pm

….and the point of this comment No.5 is……??

no.5
Reply to  Steve Draper
1, February 2013 11:14 pm

I thouight that was obvious….where are our kids going to live? they could stay at hoem with their parents, or they could move of the Island depriving us of a key asset…youth. Yes we need to resolve employment problems and infrastructure problems (hang on don’t these two sorth themselves out when we employ people to sort out the intrastructure problems) We could of course kick all the… Read more »

Bystander
1, February 2013 10:33 am

The flooding doesn’t look very extensive on that map, it must be in summer as its a lot worse in winter.

Incidentally No. 5, the Isle of Wight Society are opposed and say there is no need whatsoever for a huge complex especially one that desecrates an area of green countryside.

Kind of makes your argument look like scaremongering

David
12, February 2013 3:48 pm

http://pennyfeathers.info/blog/2013/01/planning-application-registered/ 40% of the Island’s housing needs until 2027- too good to be true, surely? This alone is a good case. There is still PLENTY of green space around. How many people use it now? Will it also mean an increase in the use of public transport (ie: Train)? The merits of this application should be on the quality of the build and design, not on the… Read more »

Bystander
21, February 2013 10:30 am

Trying to access the information in order to comment on the Pennyfeathers proposals but the Councils website is unable to cope and is grinding to a virtual halt. This isn’t good enough all comments have to be in by tomorrow, 22 Feb., and as usual the Councils IT provision is hindering rather than assisting us. I suspect this is the intention.

Mr Einsteins Ghost
21, February 2013 7:35 pm

http://www.wightbay.com/notices-events/pennyfeather-development-bad-news/4703065

If this is typical, then I sincerely hope this goes ahead, if this indicative of the hysterical, bigoted, snobbish and quite frankly, highly dysfunctional protesters. Whoever posted the above link (not here, but WightBay) or if you support such attitudes, then shame on you.

chas
3, March 2013 3:42 pm

Its building for profit and not a genuine need as usual , planning dept are using mainland consultants to process planning applications……recent visit in west wight from Manchester company to process 40 in 3 days !, no doubt a thorough job done ……

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined