Saved our rink

Local community comes together and saves Ryde Arena Ice Rink saved from closure

Just two months since news of the closure of Ryde Arena was announced by Planet Ice, the skating venue has been saved. By the community.

Up to 40 jobs would have been lost had the venue closed on 25 March as previously planned by Planet Ice, but as reported over the last couple of months, a team of community-minded individuals came together to create the Ryde Arena Trust Ltd.

Through the determination and hard work of these individuals, the lease for the ice rink has now been secured by the community group.

Good news shared by Trust
The news was announced last night (Saturday). Robin Crossley from the steering group posted the following message to Facebook,

It has taken a lot of hours work by many and the few but we finally got the end result that we all wanted, the rink is ours and it’s here to stay – by the community, for the community.

“I would personally like to thank all who have supported us, whether with your time, financially or just with your voice on FB and at the rally… Without you guys, this wouldn’t have been possible and with that being said, without your continued help and support, it will not last long, so please if you can, dig deep and help us as the first few months will be the toughest financially, not to mention the cost of repairs and renovations to come.

“I am sure this is echoed throughout the other directors and trustees whom I am thankful to work along side.”

Praise from Parliamentary candidate
Vix Lowthion, IW Parliamentary Candidate for the Green Party, says:

“To lose the Ice Rink would have been a tragedy for the young people on the Isle of Wight.

“I heartily congratulate our local community leaders who have stepped forward and organised themselves to take over the rink on our behalf, and all of the Islanders who have fundraised to get the money together to ensure a proper business plan can be put in place.

“Our sporting and leisure facilities are vital for the health and well being of both visitors and Islanders.

“We cannot afford to lose them, and we shouldn’t have to rely on volunteers having to solve the crises when they are threatened.

“My young boys are excited that they can return to the rink and get on the ice in the near future.”

Image: © Joy Attrill and DNN Signs

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John
5, October 2016 6:20 pm

‘save in the region of £4m per year’

Looks to me that they plan continued spending of that money, instead on not spending it, and by delaying loan repayment, increase costs by a few more percent of that… and continue higher spending (reduced saving) year on year.

Am I missing something, other than a new definition of a balanced budget?

steve stubbings
5, October 2016 6:27 pm

Yes, John. You’re missing something.
Read the Medium Term Financial Strategy for full details.

jack black
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 6:40 pm

thats a cop out just give us a precis .

Lazy
Reply to  jack black
5, October 2016 7:26 pm

So, you cant be bothered to read the published strategy – instead you want Steve to waste his time by telling you about it again?

Its not a cop out – go read the report and stop being lazy.

Mat
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 8:47 pm

Why then send a letter to Government for more money?Will IW Council get any money now, they have released this?Steve Stubbings.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Mat
5, October 2016 9:38 pm

No, they won’t and never would from this Tory Government and our useless Conservative MP

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 5:29 am

Why send letter when IW Council is planning to do this?

John
Reply to  steve stubbings
5, October 2016 9:53 pm

Steve – I have now read. Have You? The £4m ‘saving’ claimed in the above press release (‘spin’?) is actually presented as £2m in the report I believe. Report para.38: “It reduces the annual amount required to be set aside over the medium term commencing with a £2.0m saving in 2016/17 and reducing to zero by 2032/33 and then subsequently increasing by circa £150,000 per annum but… Read more »

okayanyway
5, October 2016 6:29 pm

Electioneering and nothing else. They will be saying they came up with this idea, as if.

Lazy
Reply to  okayanyway
5, October 2016 7:31 pm

So who did come up with it?? This is the Independents idea. To be fair, the Tory government gave them absolutely no choice, and the Island shambles that calls itself Tory have done nothing to help apart from heckle from the sidelines, and they havnt even managed to do that properly… I suppose given that the Independents would never have had to come up with this plan… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 9:37 pm

To be accurate, I suggested a debt repayment holiday (of which this is a watered down version) some months ago at a cross-party Budget liaison meeting – one of many suggestions I have made over the last 3 years through positive engagement with this Council. The CX was nearly apoplectic at the suggestion. It is the new Finance Officer from Portsmouth who is Mr Yes to original… Read more »

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 7:00 am

Cllr Lumley, are you implying the CX and the previous Finance Officer could have done more?

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Mat
6, October 2016 9:04 am

Yes

Mat
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
6, October 2016 9:19 am

Should IWC share Portsmouth’s CX then?Saving?

CB500
5, October 2016 7:03 pm

‘ but instead of the originally proposed figure of £12.5m the target can now be reduced to £8.5m. ‘ That £8.5m is about what we stump up to Island Roads each year isn’t it? How about pulling the plug, accepting the short term penalties and spending, say, a million a year on the roads ourselves? That would go a long way toward stopping further cuts. Or is… Read more »

Lazy
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 7:35 pm

£1million a year on the roads would get us nothing. The PFI must run its course. There have been disasters, incompetence, and even the dumping of cats eyes in hedges, but most of the roads they have done so far are a thousand times better than the dirt tracks we had before. Having said that, once the “core investment period” is finished (7 years?), we should definitely… Read more »

CB500
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 8:32 pm

£1m was a starter for debate. Island roads have been given a lot of money for little return so far. Undercliff, shoddy street lighting, cheap skim overs with slidy tarmac. Boniface road in Ventnor is already sinking again a year and a half after completion.
Just trying to be creative here.

Lazy
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 9:01 pm

Undercliff failed. Bouldner road in Yarmouth was successful. Street lighting provides less light – causing less light pollution and saving power. “cheap skim overs” are what Pughs tories did. IR have planed off the road surface and replaced it. If a road is sinking – report it. They are then obliged to do something about it – if they can. No-one can control geological activity. There are… Read more »

profoundlife
Reply to  Lazy
5, October 2016 11:53 pm

Dammit, Lazy. I hate reasoned opinion looking at both sides of the argument. I want polemics I can shout!

CB500
Reply to  Lazy
6, October 2016 7:41 am

It’s amazing how the simple act of giving an arm of a multinational corporation a cosy local name ‘ Island Roads ‘ pulls the wool over some people’s eyes.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Lazy
6, October 2016 8:09 am

Agreed, CB500.

This is worth a look…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinci_SA#Criticism

Tarmac
Reply to  CB500
5, October 2016 8:11 pm

Spend £1m pa on the roads? Are you mad? That’s how they ended up in such a bad state. Also the IWC doesn’t have a proper highways dept anymore so they’d have to recruit a load of staff that moved over to Island Roads.

CB500
Reply to  Tarmac
5, October 2016 8:34 pm

I think a good look would find that the majority of the staff who moved were soon out on their ears.

tyke
5, October 2016 10:52 pm

If the council is so concerned at it’s debt levels, why did it recently decide to borrow an additional £70m to finance Amey’s profits under the waste contract?

Caconym
6, October 2016 8:11 am

#Begin Sarcasm_Mode Perhaps things will be better for the Isle of Wight under the touchy-feely, caring-sharing Theresa May? #End Sarcasm_Mode Frankly, I’m going to view May’s final address with a HUGE pinch of salt. She will have to do something really substantial to prove that the Tories are no longer the “nasty party”. She could start by sacking Jeremy Hunt. That man epitomises all that is wrong… Read more »

Jonathan
6, October 2016 8:48 am

I’d just like to say that our councillors (probably all of them) have had a horrible time dealing with austerity and the Conservative dogma that led to local Conservatives chewing their own mouths off to support their own stranglers. Shame on our MP and Conservative councillors for not caring about home while pandering to their party grandees. Thank goodness we have some people of conscience trying to… Read more »

Tim
6, October 2016 9:55 am

Still ignoring the “Elephant in the Room” then IWC?

Rod Manley
6, October 2016 12:54 pm

Is this tackling Austerity or is it really dealing with the consequences of it?

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined