iw-pride-sjp - john kilpatrick

Only one councillor didn’t support Isle of Wight Pride last night: Here’s why

At last night’s full council meeting (catch up with our live coverage) all councillors bar one voted in favour of “re-affirming” their support for Isle of Wight Pride.

The one councillor who chose not to vote in favour of the motion – or against – was Cllr John Kilpatrick (Conservative councillor for Binstead and Fishbourne).

Kilpatrick: Abstained “because I chose to”
OnTheWight queued with other Isle of Wight reporters to speak to Cllr Kilpatrick after the meeting to find out why he abstained.

He told OnTheWight,

“Because I chose to.”

When asked why he chose to, he replied,

“I didn’t want to vote yes and I didn’t want to vote no.”

He added,

“I went to Pride this year. I’ve got no issue with Pride at all. I just chose to abstain.”

Cllr admits to not reading papers
However, Cllr Kilpatrick, who is paid £7,700 per annum for serving as a councillor, told Emily at the County Press,

“I had not decided, so I didn’t vote.”

Going on to admit,

“Maybe I should have read the motion in more depth, but I don’t vote for things I haven’t read properly.”

Several councillors spoke on the matter prior to the vote, giving Cllr Kilpatrick plenty of time during the meeting to read and understand the motion.

Councillors paid to read papers
All councillors receive papers for the full council meetings one week in advance to inform them of the matters to be discussed prior to the meeting.

The full council meetings are now only held every two months.

Aside from the various motions put forward from councillors, there was only one main item for debate last night (the £100m property investment). Despite that, Cllr Kilpatrick admits he’d not read the motion properly prior to or during the meeeting.

The motion
The motion Cllr Kilpatrick chose to abstain on was presented by Cllr Debbie André (Ind) and read,

This Council congratulates the organisers of the Pride Event which took place in Ryde in July this year and welcomes the support for the event shown by the Isle of Wight community.

The Isle of Wight Council pledges to support next year’s Pride Event, due to take place on 21st July 2018, and to encourage support for Diversity on the Isle of Wight.

Invitation to constituents
When we suggested his constituents might be confused to hear that he’s happy to simply abstain on voting on council business for no particular reason, he replied,

“They are welcome to come and speak to me.”

Any Islanders who want to find out more can contact Cllr Kilpatrick by emailing him on his official email address: john.kilpatrick@iow.gov.uk. In contrast to nearly all of the councillors, he does not provide a phone number.

Cllr Kilpatrick won his seat by two votes in the 2017 local election. Two votes in that ward were rejected at the count.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
10 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Luke
23, November 2012 3:38 pm

The response from the Council that they are relying on the regulations is very worrying. Firstly, are they suggesting that France does not have similar regulations? Secondly, are they ignoring the fact that Eurovia are reported to be guilty of gross negligence? It doesn’t matter what the regulations are if they are not being followed. Thirdly, just because something is legal doesn’t make it safe. It used… Read more »

downwind resident
23, November 2012 5:15 pm

Well done Julia Hill and WRAP for bringing this information to our attention. Even Cllr Pugh can’t call this factual report from the French Appeal Court ‘Scaremongering’ (can he?) If Eurovia/Vinci can show utter contempt for one of their own workers and have only compensated his widow after four years following an Appeal Court finding against them what chance do our local communities have on the Isle… Read more »

Black Dog
23, November 2012 6:09 pm

If the Council go ahead with this application, ignoring all the hard evidence that says the plant is a danger to the surrounding houses and the environment, Julia Hill and WRAP should position themselves for a Judicial Review and mount a legal challenge. Given the density and physical area involved I am sure we can raise enough funds to ensure we meet all the legal requirements in… Read more »

Matthew James Martin
23, November 2012 8:14 pm

My thanks also goes to Julia Hill and the other WRAP campaigners for all of your continued investigative research and efforts, in highlighting all the issues and concerns with the Eurovia Asphalt plant site planning application. I give my overall support to the words above by James Luke , ‘Downwind Residents’ and ‘Black Dog’ Myself and all Islanders want to see improved Highways and a successful PFI… Read more »

I do not believe it
24, November 2012 10:44 am

I keep asking myself – “Would I buy a secondhand car, or, for that matter, asphalt from Eurovia?”

On the whole, and after careful reflection of life’s experiences, I think I would source elsewhere.

I wonder if anyone in County Hall is of a similar mindset?

hussar
Reply to  I do not believe it
27, November 2012 3:45 pm

Are you presupposing that any of that unholy crew have a mind for anything other than their own wellbeing?

adrian nicholas
6, December 2012 6:17 pm

Cllr.Gorge Brown; “Emissions are controlled very strictly and specifically by legislation. This is a very important aspect of the planning application which is before the local authority. This is a very important aspect of the planning application which is before the local authority and can give every assurance it will be dealt with the greatest care and greatest attention.”’ Strange, given that, initially when filing the planning… Read more »

downwind resident
Reply to  adrian nicholas
7, December 2012 8:31 am

Cllr. Brown may need to reconsider his alleged statement. He cannot rely on the data submitted by the applicant because it is only based on theoretical figures not hard facts from empirical measurements. In fact recent objections indicate misleading acoustic data submissions so what else? Ergo,if he relies on false data to determine the Permit and/or Planning applications he will not have exercised due care. Should an… Read more »

James Luke
Reply to  downwind resident
7, December 2012 3:40 pm

The data that I have seen in the planning application has all been theoretical. The noise data is not taken from a real Asphalt Plant – it is some form of design specification that is far better than any existing plant. The emmissions data is all theoretical. Apparently data isn’t available for their existing plants. Existing Air Quality data is not available as the Council don’t monitor… Read more »

downwind resident
Reply to  James Luke
8, December 2012 7:01 pm

Does anyone believe Eurovia or their so called Consultants?

Please advise soonest.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined