Magnifying glass:

Police investigate allegations ‘of the falsifying of signatures’ on electoral nomination form (updated)

Readers will remember the OnTheWight report last week where Chair of Isle of Wight Conservatives, Alan Wells, accuses a UKIP candidate of falsifying a nominee on his electoral nomination forms.

The accusation resulted in a blast from Nigel Farage, head of UKIP who accused the Conservative Chairman of a smear. This led to a subsequent retort from Mr Wells, who accused Farage of a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction.

Police investigating allegations
Police have confirmed today (Wednesday 24th April) that they have now received “allegations of the falsifying of signatures on electoral nomination papers from more than one member of the public”.

They say that initial enquiries are continuing to establish whether there is evidence to suggest a criminal offence could have been committed.

OnTheWight has requested a comment from UKIP and will update this report once we hear back from them.

Update 15.27
A UKIP spokesman said “Mr Wilkins has been informed that the police have been contacted however they have yet to speak to him regarding these allegations which he insists are false.

“This is a very hurtful situation for him and his family and we ask that the police are allowed to deal with the matter without unnecessary external influences.”

Image: Siri Hardeland under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
23 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr Magoo
24, April 2013 4:09 pm

…..“we ask that the police are allowed to deal with the matter without unnecessary external influences”. If the boot was on the other foot I am sure UKIP would be making maximum political capital out of this and not attempting to brush it under the carpet. Besides, the police would not be influenced by ‘unnecessary external influences’ and may welcome information contained in comments on sites such… Read more »

Robert Jones
Reply to  Mr Magoo
25, April 2013 12:02 pm

Frankly, it’s best if we reserve all judgement on this issue until matters have been cleared up by those qualified to investigate them. I remain very concerned that Mr Wells thought it proper to disclose these matters in public in the first place – I can only say that I would never have done that when I was an Agent, and I don’t believe that the opposite… Read more »

Braveheart
24, April 2013 4:32 pm

[comment removed by moderator]

tryme
24, April 2013 4:36 pm

Poirot speaks!

Hunter
24, April 2013 4:42 pm

Here we go again ! Funny more found after the press article Friday ? Is this another party member too ? Is it ten on the form ? Who cares , these forms are outdated should just be candidate and a witness or something why dose it need ten , well more public money wasted then as these never get to court or convictions to hard to… Read more »

RJC
24, April 2013 4:44 pm

They say there is more than one false signature. The plot thickens. I hope the UKIP bloke has not been silly and it is all a misunderstanding. When it was one signature, my first thoughts were it’s a setup, but now there are more I shall have to waver and not pass judgement.

Robert Jones
Reply to  RJC
25, April 2013 12:09 pm

And here you have the real problem in disclosing this sort of thing before a proper investigation has taken place; “they say there is more than one false signature” … well, “they” can say anything now; and it’s not even demonstrated that the disputed signature is false. The proper thing to do when you have suspicions about another party or person’s candidature is to report them to… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Robert Jones
25, April 2013 12:15 pm

If Alan Wells has shown extremely poor judgement here that is because the Tories have shown very poor judgement placing a man the electorate have rejected in such a position.

greenfiremouse
24, April 2013 5:37 pm

@RJC: I am not so certain whether “Police have confirmed … that they have now received allegations … from more than one member of the public.” means that these allegations refer to more than one signature. In the original report, both the Wells and the Wilkins versions of events contained inconsistencies that made them sound just not quite right. More than 10 signatures is impossible on the… Read more »

RJC
24, April 2013 5:55 pm

It is rumoured there could be 4 false signatures, I also think all of the parties go through the forms and throw members out of their respective clubs if they have been caught nominating a rival party.

Braveheart
24, April 2013 11:20 pm

It appears that certain people on the Island have made outrageous allegations against the UKIP Newport North candidate, in some obscure plot to undermine his integrity without any consideration as to the legal ramifications being cast against him and his family. Therefore, I hope the CID during their enquiries will thoroughly check out various copies of signatures [part of comment removed] thus proving the allegations of forgeries… Read more »

steve s
25, April 2013 6:42 am

One observation I’ve been dying to make for ages: If you can’t find ten people that you know to sign for you in the ward in which you are standing, you probably shouldn’t be a candidate in the first place.

tryme
Reply to  steve s
25, April 2013 7:40 am

I can’t find the piece here OTW that had Richard Wilkins as the main photo, but the one featuring Nigel F., of April 16th, has NF (unfortunate initials) saying “he went to collect signatures for his nomination and knocked on doors in the Atkinson Drive area”, as though that’s the most normal thing in the world. Is it? I too would imagine a candidate worth their salt… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Sally Perry
25, April 2013 8:21 am

That would explain it, thanks Sally! For some reason I thought I recalled a ‘So that’s what he looks like’ moment, but a photo of him isn’t even in the body of the articles, so goodness knows what that was about.

tryme
Reply to  tryme
25, April 2013 8:26 am

Conceivably the CP, I suppose.

Robert Jones
Reply to  steve s
25, April 2013 12:14 pm

Have to say, I strongly agree with that; finding a nominator, seconder and 8 assentors is a good means of ensuring that there is SOME basis of support for a candidate in a ward, which justifies his or her standing and the consequent public expense of running an election contest at all. (Even though I got my 10 signatures in Carisbrooke East decades ago; stood against Steve… Read more »

vanessa churchman
25, April 2013 9:32 am

I find it all very sad. I do feel sorry for Mr w, as somebody has remarked he could now be embroiled in a criminal case and that is not what this election should be about. However if you get involved in Party Politics then you must face the consequences and this is all the more reason to vote Independent. I stand or fall by what I… Read more »

John Luckett
25, April 2013 10:21 am

Absolutely Vanessa…I have refrained from commenting on this issue until now. I feel this chain of events detracts from the issues and challenges our Island faces…take yesterdays announcement about Carisbrooke in Special Measures as one example. Maybe that is what the objective was, who knows? My campaign shall continue in a positive manner and simply try and meet as many people as I can. Thank you to… Read more »

steve s
Reply to  John Luckett
25, April 2013 12:42 pm

John, you are absolutely right in what you say.
There are two brands tarnished by this debacle, and neither of them is Independent.

no.5
Reply to  steve s
25, April 2013 2:52 pm

or Labour

greenfiremouse
Reply to  no.5
25, April 2013 9:24 pm

Or, as a matter of fact, members of the Green Party!

no.5
25, April 2013 2:54 pm

I was warned by my agent to make sure every ‘I’ was dotted and ‘t’ crossed especially in regards to electon material because the powers that be will try everything to effect the election

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined