Real Ventures’ Stag Lane Biomass Plant Overview

Charlotte takes a further look at the background to the proposed biomass plant. Ed

You may have been following plans for a Biomass Plant in Stag Lane, Newport, for a while, but if not, here is what has happened, from the beginning.

Wood Pellets2009: “Restricted marketing exercise”
In late 2009, the IW Council undertook a “restricted marketing exercise” for the former Stag Lane Tip site to find a renewable energy scheme for the area.

March 2010: Three bidders considered
On the 10th March 2010 three bidders were considered by the Cabinet.

Party A wanted to use the site for “mining of biodegradable and organic matters from the site to generate heat and electricity through a specific pyrolysis process. It would also receive biomass refuse derived fuel from on and off the Island.” This would have created nine megawatts of electricity.

Party B wanted to use the site for “a large dedicated biomass combined heat and power unit through the combustion of biomass fuels from the Island, the UK mainland and Europe. The associated aspect comprises a fuel processing plant on the site which would convert biomass into a biomass fuel for use by the Party B facility and for export to coal-fired power stations across the UK.”

At this date it was stated this facility would create 50 megawatts of electricity.

This was the option chosen by the cabinet to become the “Preferred Bidder”.

The company was originally known as Real (Renewable Energy And Landscape) Ltd, changing its name (on 28th January 2009) to Real Ventures Ltd (Company info).

Party C wanted to use the site to build “a technology centre for research and development for renewable energy.”

Declaration of interest
During this meeting Cllr Bingham, Cllr Brown, Cllr Pugh and Cllr Giles declared an interest in these proposals, stating they knew some of the people involved.

April 2011: 15 month extension granted
On the 12th April 2011 the Cabinet extended the preferred bidder status to Real Ventures for a further 15 months “to enable up to 12 months of ground testing plus subsequent analysis of findings.”

During this meeting Cllr Pugh, again, declared a personal interest in the proposal because he knew some of the parties involved. Cllr Brown was in attendance at this meeting, but did not declare an interest.

Why the reduction in megawatts?
By this meeting the expected electricity output of the biomass plant had been reduced to 49 megawatts.

The difference between 50MW and 49MW might seem small in number, but in terms of legal issues, it’s considerable. A 50MW station is scrutinised by a national body – a 49MW one is considered at the local level.

April 2012: Request another extension and an option to buy
On 28th April 2012, CEO of Real Ventures, Ray Tucker, wrote to the Council asking for a further extension.

They stated that if they were allowed an extension, they would immediately enter into negotiations with the Council to secure a purchase option on the Stag Lane Site. “We suggest the option should be valid for two years and that together we should look to complete negotiations and take the option to signing within a three month period (and prior to the final preparation of the planning application.)”

May 2012: Further 12 month extension granted
On 22nd May 2012 the Cabinet once again extended the preferred bidder status for another 12 months to give Real Ventures “further time complete the ongoing site monitoring” as well as the formal risk assessment and discussions with the Environment Agency to permit waste to be moved around the site.

Declaration of interest
The CP reported that during this meeting both Cllr Pugh and Cllr Brown declared a personal interest in the proposal.

It’s currently unclear if Real Ventures gained their option to buy. We will research and update.

Once again the output of the plant was expected to be 49 megawatts.

The current preferred bidder status runs out at the end of July 2013.

Documents
The council documents related to the Real Ventures proposal are embedded below for your convenience.


Image: Andrew Michaels under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
16 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tryme
1, May 2013 1:16 pm

We’re hardly going to be scared into voting for you and your ‘cabinet’ again, DP, because you offer a majority party at County Hall. That’s the point, we don’t want it to happen this time!

Island Monkey
1, May 2013 1:29 pm

As ever, pathetic posturing from David Pugh. I wonder if he loses will he will go into hiding on Friday – or will he admit his failures?

Some say he will be busy shredding in County Hall. I can’t imagine why?

matt.h
Reply to  Island Monkey
1, May 2013 1:45 pm

It’ll not just be shredding, but email deleting and loosing mail server backup tapes – Perhaps I shouldn’t have said that it will give them ideas

wightywight
Reply to  matt.h
1, May 2013 2:18 pm

On a serious note….. I sincerely hope his electronic pass [24 hour access to County Hall….!]is disabled immediately the results are declared on Friday.
Their role is over from that moment and no unfettered access to County Hall should be possible. [unless, of course, the residents of Shanklin have been sleepwalking for 4 years and get the boxes mixed up on the ballot paper!]

ww

tryme
Reply to  matt.h
1, May 2013 4:08 pm

Yes, that’s enough ‘ideas’!

Darcy
Reply to  Island Monkey
1, May 2013 2:21 pm

He’ll be back down that drain as we saw in the OTW caption competition! This time he can stay down there!

Yarmouth Gal
1, May 2013 1:35 pm

Why does whatever comes out of David Pugh always strike me as being so blooming arrogant?

Yarmouth Gal
Reply to  Yarmouth Gal
1, May 2013 1:35 pm

*Comes out of David Pugh’s mouth

tryme
Reply to  Yarmouth Gal
1, May 2013 4:11 pm

We weren’t contemplating any other of his orifices, YG!

Robert Jones
Reply to  tryme
1, May 2013 6:23 pm

In all the talk of dirty tricks and concerning developments, I really did enjoy tryme’s comment! Cheered me up nicely…..

DB
1, May 2013 1:37 pm

How can the tories not consider education as a key issue?

wightywight
Reply to  DB
1, May 2013 2:13 pm

…because ” Mr Pugh rejected criticisms about the island’s schools, saying results for 11-year-olds were the “best we’ve ever had” and secondary education should be judged on a “school by school basis” … So, let’s do that then. Firstly, when you drive academic achievements into the ground it’s a simple step to get to the “best ever results”….. they are not to be confused with UK wide… Read more »

steve s
1, May 2013 2:20 pm

*shakes head in disbelief*

The man is in denial until the bitter end.
I suppose hubris will do that to you.

steve s
Reply to  steve s
1, May 2013 2:24 pm

promoted by etc…

Highway to Hell
1, May 2013 3:07 pm

Dear Island Residents, (especially if you live in Shanklin) As you are aware, we are the department that deals with roads. However, as we are trusted by residents and visitors alike, we have been asked by the Vote Counting Department at County Hall to provide assurances to residents that in the event of Prospective Councillor Priest winning, there will be an instant re-count. This will be carried… Read more »

bayboy
Reply to  Highway to Hell
1, May 2013 9:49 pm

What drivel

dean
1, May 2013 9:32 pm

Oh mr Pugh how we love you, your brilliant and revolutionary ideas like closing tourist info centres and toilets on a holiday island was a piece of brilliance! Then you said that we residence shouldn’t complain about the huge prices charged to cross the Solent for fear of putting people off coming (as though seeing the price themselves may have affected them) you have led our adult… Read more »

Black Dog
Reply to  dean
1, May 2013 10:45 pm

PUGH-NOCCHIO

tryme
1, May 2013 10:58 pm

Where and when will the result be announced, and where will we congregate to hear it and celebrate it?

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  tryme
1, May 2013 11:09 pm

Full details of where and how it will be announced on Friday (the count starts at 9am) will be revealed tomorrow, but we hope to do you proud ;-)

tryme
Reply to  Sally Perry
1, May 2013 11:40 pm

I’m very sure you will!!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined