Sainsburys signage

Sainsbury’s Newport celebrates 50th anniversary of Carers Week

This in from Tanya on behalf of Sainsbury’s Newport. Ed


This year’s Carers Week takes place from 8th – 14th June. To mark the 50th Anniversary of Carers UK, Sainsbury’s Newport Isle of Wight has invited in a number of local carers charities into the store to mark this milestone.

Highlighting the challenges carers face
Run by Carers UK, Carers Week is an annual event designed to help raise awareness of caring, highlight the challenges carers face and recognise the contribution they make to families and communities throughout the UK. Sainsbury’s has proudly supported Carers UK for five years.

Across the week, Stroke Association, Age UK, YMCA & Dementia Society will be in store to talk to customers and colleagues about the work they do and to share details of support that is available for carers.

Find out more
Paul Dyer Store Manager, said:

“Carers Week is a great opportunity to shine a light on what it means to be a carer and the support available in the community. We are looking forward to welcoming

Stroke Association between 10-12.00 on Monday 8th June,
Age UK Wednesday 10th – 10.00 – 5.00,
YMCA Thursday 11th 10.00 – 2.00 &
Alzheimer’s Society Friday 12th 1.00 – 4.00pm

into the Newport Isle of Wight store to find out more about what they do and I hope that our customers and colleagues find it both interesting and useful.”

If you would like further information about caring, please visit Sainsbury’s Newport Isle of Wight during Carers Week.

Image: ell-r-brown under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James P
2, June 2010 2:15 pm

I don’t know about the public, but they certainly seem to fool the planners! I think the same probably applies to models – it’s not difficult to adjust the vertical scale, and long, low buildings usually look more attractive. I said at the time, in the CP, that I thought that the only reason the cinema complex (or tin shed as I prefer to think of it)… Read more »

Icarus
2, June 2010 3:49 pm

The artists impression if commissioned by whoever is seeking permission is obviously going to reflect exactly what they want it to.
That said the planning authorities are certainly not in any position to criticise artistic license, as they clearly apply it in abundance when awarding permission.
The whole system is wide open to corruption, as is any system where discretionary powers exist. For example the police.

Jem
2, June 2010 5:12 pm

Thanks for highlighting this. It’s outrageous that the height has been manipulated in the so called artist’s impression. I can think of another word for it, but will hold my tongue.

Neil
Reply to  Jem
2, June 2010 5:39 pm

I went to the IWC website to look at the details of the scheme. There is a red box with the following next to the details – ‘Please note: The Isle of Wight County Press used the wrong artist’s impression of the plans for the Mill Bay site on Ventnor Esplanade in its May 28th edition. Anyone commenting to the planning authority on the basis of seeing… Read more »

Icarus
Reply to  Neil
2, June 2010 6:10 pm

So are we supposed to believe that the County Press is actually capable of making its own blunders, independent of council interference? I thought they printed what they were told to print.

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  Neil
2, June 2010 6:30 pm

Just to be clear, the artist’s impression referred to in the VB article above is the one submitted with this current application.

designstein
2, June 2010 6:10 pm

An illustrator has to respond to the brief he is given ~ I should know, I have been a “visualiser” for almost fifty years! Yes,an illustration can deceive, but so can an architectural elevation. For example, the roof of a detached house will always appear higher on an accurate elevation than when viewed from street-level. In the case of Mill Bay, the new proposal would stand next… Read more »

intentionally blank
Reply to  designstein
2, June 2010 8:08 pm

couldnt agree with you more. an artists impression is just that, an impression. it doesnt claim to be accurate, only to give an idea. The plans are where the accuracy should lay.

It might be nice to see legislation to set standards for both plans and impressions. Surely an impression superimposed over a photo of the site would be a better way of doing things.

Steephill Jack
2, June 2010 6:45 pm

The best impression of the elevations seems to be in the document: Plan -Site- and street elevations.
I wondered what that awful black stuff was on the highest building and it’s stained timber cladding of Siberian larch, so now I wonder why it has to be so dark ?

Frustrated by the System
2, June 2010 7:28 pm

Well guys you really have opened a can of worms this time…..where to start? Best practice..is there such a thing within development? I’m not sure there is. It has seemed to me, for quite a while now, that it is the job of all involved with developments, to mislead. From the people who draw up the documents to the people who determine the documents. Design and Access… Read more »

Paul Randle-Jolliffe
2, June 2010 8:24 pm

As some one who studied architecture, there should be no such thing as an “artist impression” in planning applications, these drawings should be produced by architects to accurate standards that are scaled as all other plans should be, colour being introduced to demonstrate the finished look not for artistic merit. From the look of these drawings someone does not know how to draw, I would say incompetence… Read more »

James P
Reply to  Paul Randle-Jolliffe
2, June 2010 9:14 pm

Why not just insist that all planning application illustration are to scale? Every architectural ‘artists impression’ I’ve seen has had lowered rooflines and exaggerated perspective – I’ve nothing against the artists, who are simply keeping their employers happy, but such things should not be taken seriously by planners. Isometric drawings might not look so pretty, but that’s really the point…

Debby Robinson
2, June 2010 9:16 pm

All those interested in the future of this application please attend the Ventnor Town Council Planning Meeting @ the Winter Gardens next Mon (7th) @ 6 pm when it will be discussed.

Steephill Jack
2, June 2010 9:21 pm

The Town Clerk has announced that[these] “Two urgent planning matters have required an additional Town Council meeting on Monday 7 June at 6pm at the Winter Gardens”. I recall that one of the signatories on the resolutions that went to the Town Meeting in Holy Trinity Church on 24th March was Mr. N. Gibbs who is also a signatory for these planning applications. It’s a good thing… Read more »

islebeseeingyou
Reply to  Steephill Jack
3, June 2010 9:43 am

and your point is?

Steephill Jack
Reply to  islebeseeingyou
3, June 2010 8:35 pm

My point is that we need a Town Council to represent us to the County Council on many issues and to carry out the normal activities of signing cheques and keeping the Winter Gardens open. Those who keep calling for the resignation of the remaining councillors prefer a period of three or four months when we would be defenceless and the Winter Gardens closed. Some businesses and… Read more »

islebeseeingyou
Reply to  Steephill Jack
4, June 2010 11:14 am

Thanks Steephill Jack, I couldn’t understand the point you were making but now you have explained I completely agree with your views. It is imperative that the Town Council represent the views of residents to protect the heritage of Ventnor.

Sniffer dog
2, June 2010 10:46 pm

As a one time developer myself, I have to say that artist impressions are among the oldest tricks in the book. Even the most hideous out of scale development can be made to look OK by the artist. As most would-be objectors are quite ignorant of planning law, we can usually get away with it.

Beryl Stewart Cummings
3, June 2010 11:06 am

I personally know exactly what happens when architects and drawing plans fool the public, the local council and IOW Planners. The Kingsview/Rex and the Metropole were built higher than what was originally presented to the public and the approved plans. Both major developments progressed and resulted in what was excused by the IOW Planners, Enforcement and Building Control as ‘acceptable differences.” At best Ventnor receives an ‘oops”… Read more »

James P
Reply to  Beryl Stewart Cummings
3, June 2010 11:24 am

And yet there is/was a single house in Sun Hill in Cowes under threat of demolition because it is about a metre too high. The planners jump on individuals because they can, but fight shy of taking on anyone with a legal department (especially supermarkets).

Arthur Grabbit
Reply to  Beryl Stewart Cummings
4, June 2010 4:03 pm

“with different coloured pencils”

Curses! You’ve spotted how we did it…

candy chilton
Reply to  Beryl Stewart Cummings
18, September 2010 4:27 pm

absolutely agree. take a good look around..Ventnor is UNIQUE…born and bred in Ventnor,I now live in continental europe and believe me when I say there is nowhere like Ventnor..keep it safe before it is too late.

BigEars
3, June 2010 12:39 pm

Artists impressions can nowadays be rendered directly from the architectural drawings by the computer aided design (CAD) software that they use. This produces a very accurate extrapolation of the actual building, as drawn on the plans, including a natural parallax.

Presumably the ‘artist’ then massages this drawing until it looks acceptable by the planning dept.

Simon Perry
Admin
Reply to  BigEars
3, June 2010 1:35 pm

We’ve had an offer from an independent expert in 3D modelling to build one of these for the Mill Bay proposal.

He’s offering to do it for a max cost of £90 – well under what it would cost commercially.

If people want to pay for it, we can get it arranged. Just let us know.

ventnorfan
3, June 2010 3:46 pm

It is good of you to point out the discrepencies in the artist’s impression of the proposed development but, let’s be fair, something needs to be done with Ventnor sea front. With one or two honourable exceptions the rag bag of low rise tat and crumbling building needs carpet bombing and a front worthy of the 21st Century built in its place.Take a trip across the Channel… Read more »

Icarus
3, June 2010 3:47 pm

Since when did the IWC start considering the evidence?
We might well stand more chance by rolling up the old trouser leg!

bes
3, June 2010 7:15 pm

For those of us that haven’t crossed the Channel to compare, I wonder which French town ‘ventnorfan’refers to that’s been ‘carpet bombed'(Dunkirk perhaps?) and brought into the French 21st century-and how it compares in size to Ventnor? …and perhaps identify the one or two ‘honourable exceptions in Ventnor? In my opinion, to date, The developer’s attempts to bring Ventnor into the 21st century have resulted in one… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined